Cargando…

A randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions

OBJECTIVES: We examined the effect of ‘labels’ versus ‘descriptions’ across four asymptomatic health conditions: pre-diabetes, pre-hypertension, mild hyperlipidaemia, and chronic kidney disease stage 3A, on participants’ intentions to pursue further tests. There were four secondary objectives: 1) as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas, Rae, Spence, Mark T., Roy, Rajat, Beller, Elaine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7588049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33104739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240985
_version_ 1783600300504907776
author Thomas, Rae
Spence, Mark T.
Roy, Rajat
Beller, Elaine
author_facet Thomas, Rae
Spence, Mark T.
Roy, Rajat
Beller, Elaine
author_sort Thomas, Rae
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We examined the effect of ‘labels’ versus ‘descriptions’ across four asymptomatic health conditions: pre-diabetes, pre-hypertension, mild hyperlipidaemia, and chronic kidney disease stage 3A, on participants’ intentions to pursue further tests. There were four secondary objectives: 1) assessing confidence and satisfaction in their intention to test further; 2) revealing psychological drivers affecting intentions; 3) exploring whether intentions, confidence and satisfaction differ by label vs. description and health condition; and 4) producing a perceptual map of illnesses by label condition. METHODS: Practitioner validated health-related scenarios were used. Two variants of each condition were developed. Participants were recruited through Qualtrics from Australia, Ireland and Canada and randomly assigned two ‘labelled’ or two ‘descriptive’ scenarios. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in intentions to test between label and description conditions (95% CI -0.76 to 0.33 points, p = 0.4). Confidence and satisfaction were both positively associated with intentions: regression coefficient (β) for confidence β = 0.58 points (95% CI 0.49 to 0.68, p < .001) and for satisfaction 0.67 points (95% CI 0.57 to 0.77, p < .001). Predisposition to seek healthcare (β = 0.72; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.98), attributing illness to bad luck (β = -0.16 points; 95% CI -0.3 to -0.02), and concern about the health condition (β = 0.51; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.65) also significantly predicted intentions. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike studies investigating symptomatic illnesses, the disease label effect on behavioural intentions was not supported suggesting that reducing demand for medical services for borderline cases cannot be achieved by labelling. The average intention to test score was higher in this sample than previous symptomatic health-related studies and there was a positive relationship between increased intentions and confidence/satisfaction in one’s decision. Exploratory insights suggested perceptions of the four labelled asymptomatic illnesses all shifted toward greater levels of dread and concern compared to their respective description condition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12618000392268.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7588049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75880492020-10-30 A randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions Thomas, Rae Spence, Mark T. Roy, Rajat Beller, Elaine PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: We examined the effect of ‘labels’ versus ‘descriptions’ across four asymptomatic health conditions: pre-diabetes, pre-hypertension, mild hyperlipidaemia, and chronic kidney disease stage 3A, on participants’ intentions to pursue further tests. There were four secondary objectives: 1) assessing confidence and satisfaction in their intention to test further; 2) revealing psychological drivers affecting intentions; 3) exploring whether intentions, confidence and satisfaction differ by label vs. description and health condition; and 4) producing a perceptual map of illnesses by label condition. METHODS: Practitioner validated health-related scenarios were used. Two variants of each condition were developed. Participants were recruited through Qualtrics from Australia, Ireland and Canada and randomly assigned two ‘labelled’ or two ‘descriptive’ scenarios. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in intentions to test between label and description conditions (95% CI -0.76 to 0.33 points, p = 0.4). Confidence and satisfaction were both positively associated with intentions: regression coefficient (β) for confidence β = 0.58 points (95% CI 0.49 to 0.68, p < .001) and for satisfaction 0.67 points (95% CI 0.57 to 0.77, p < .001). Predisposition to seek healthcare (β = 0.72; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.98), attributing illness to bad luck (β = -0.16 points; 95% CI -0.3 to -0.02), and concern about the health condition (β = 0.51; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.65) also significantly predicted intentions. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike studies investigating symptomatic illnesses, the disease label effect on behavioural intentions was not supported suggesting that reducing demand for medical services for borderline cases cannot be achieved by labelling. The average intention to test score was higher in this sample than previous symptomatic health-related studies and there was a positive relationship between increased intentions and confidence/satisfaction in one’s decision. Exploratory insights suggested perceptions of the four labelled asymptomatic illnesses all shifted toward greater levels of dread and concern compared to their respective description condition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12618000392268. Public Library of Science 2020-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7588049/ /pubmed/33104739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240985 Text en © 2020 Thomas et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thomas, Rae
Spence, Mark T.
Roy, Rajat
Beller, Elaine
A randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions
title A randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions
title_full A randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions
title_fullStr A randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions
title_full_unstemmed A randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions
title_short A randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions
title_sort randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7588049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33104739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240985
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasrae arandomisedonlinesurveyexploringhowhealthconditionlabelsaffectbehaviouralintentions
AT spencemarkt arandomisedonlinesurveyexploringhowhealthconditionlabelsaffectbehaviouralintentions
AT royrajat arandomisedonlinesurveyexploringhowhealthconditionlabelsaffectbehaviouralintentions
AT bellerelaine arandomisedonlinesurveyexploringhowhealthconditionlabelsaffectbehaviouralintentions
AT thomasrae randomisedonlinesurveyexploringhowhealthconditionlabelsaffectbehaviouralintentions
AT spencemarkt randomisedonlinesurveyexploringhowhealthconditionlabelsaffectbehaviouralintentions
AT royrajat randomisedonlinesurveyexploringhowhealthconditionlabelsaffectbehaviouralintentions
AT bellerelaine randomisedonlinesurveyexploringhowhealthconditionlabelsaffectbehaviouralintentions