Cargando…
A randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions
OBJECTIVES: We examined the effect of ‘labels’ versus ‘descriptions’ across four asymptomatic health conditions: pre-diabetes, pre-hypertension, mild hyperlipidaemia, and chronic kidney disease stage 3A, on participants’ intentions to pursue further tests. There were four secondary objectives: 1) as...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7588049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33104739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240985 |
_version_ | 1783600300504907776 |
---|---|
author | Thomas, Rae Spence, Mark T. Roy, Rajat Beller, Elaine |
author_facet | Thomas, Rae Spence, Mark T. Roy, Rajat Beller, Elaine |
author_sort | Thomas, Rae |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: We examined the effect of ‘labels’ versus ‘descriptions’ across four asymptomatic health conditions: pre-diabetes, pre-hypertension, mild hyperlipidaemia, and chronic kidney disease stage 3A, on participants’ intentions to pursue further tests. There were four secondary objectives: 1) assessing confidence and satisfaction in their intention to test further; 2) revealing psychological drivers affecting intentions; 3) exploring whether intentions, confidence and satisfaction differ by label vs. description and health condition; and 4) producing a perceptual map of illnesses by label condition. METHODS: Practitioner validated health-related scenarios were used. Two variants of each condition were developed. Participants were recruited through Qualtrics from Australia, Ireland and Canada and randomly assigned two ‘labelled’ or two ‘descriptive’ scenarios. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in intentions to test between label and description conditions (95% CI -0.76 to 0.33 points, p = 0.4). Confidence and satisfaction were both positively associated with intentions: regression coefficient (β) for confidence β = 0.58 points (95% CI 0.49 to 0.68, p < .001) and for satisfaction 0.67 points (95% CI 0.57 to 0.77, p < .001). Predisposition to seek healthcare (β = 0.72; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.98), attributing illness to bad luck (β = -0.16 points; 95% CI -0.3 to -0.02), and concern about the health condition (β = 0.51; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.65) also significantly predicted intentions. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike studies investigating symptomatic illnesses, the disease label effect on behavioural intentions was not supported suggesting that reducing demand for medical services for borderline cases cannot be achieved by labelling. The average intention to test score was higher in this sample than previous symptomatic health-related studies and there was a positive relationship between increased intentions and confidence/satisfaction in one’s decision. Exploratory insights suggested perceptions of the four labelled asymptomatic illnesses all shifted toward greater levels of dread and concern compared to their respective description condition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12618000392268. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7588049 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75880492020-10-30 A randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions Thomas, Rae Spence, Mark T. Roy, Rajat Beller, Elaine PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: We examined the effect of ‘labels’ versus ‘descriptions’ across four asymptomatic health conditions: pre-diabetes, pre-hypertension, mild hyperlipidaemia, and chronic kidney disease stage 3A, on participants’ intentions to pursue further tests. There were four secondary objectives: 1) assessing confidence and satisfaction in their intention to test further; 2) revealing psychological drivers affecting intentions; 3) exploring whether intentions, confidence and satisfaction differ by label vs. description and health condition; and 4) producing a perceptual map of illnesses by label condition. METHODS: Practitioner validated health-related scenarios were used. Two variants of each condition were developed. Participants were recruited through Qualtrics from Australia, Ireland and Canada and randomly assigned two ‘labelled’ or two ‘descriptive’ scenarios. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in intentions to test between label and description conditions (95% CI -0.76 to 0.33 points, p = 0.4). Confidence and satisfaction were both positively associated with intentions: regression coefficient (β) for confidence β = 0.58 points (95% CI 0.49 to 0.68, p < .001) and for satisfaction 0.67 points (95% CI 0.57 to 0.77, p < .001). Predisposition to seek healthcare (β = 0.72; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.98), attributing illness to bad luck (β = -0.16 points; 95% CI -0.3 to -0.02), and concern about the health condition (β = 0.51; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.65) also significantly predicted intentions. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike studies investigating symptomatic illnesses, the disease label effect on behavioural intentions was not supported suggesting that reducing demand for medical services for borderline cases cannot be achieved by labelling. The average intention to test score was higher in this sample than previous symptomatic health-related studies and there was a positive relationship between increased intentions and confidence/satisfaction in one’s decision. Exploratory insights suggested perceptions of the four labelled asymptomatic illnesses all shifted toward greater levels of dread and concern compared to their respective description condition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12618000392268. Public Library of Science 2020-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7588049/ /pubmed/33104739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240985 Text en © 2020 Thomas et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Thomas, Rae Spence, Mark T. Roy, Rajat Beller, Elaine A randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions |
title | A randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions |
title_full | A randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions |
title_fullStr | A randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions |
title_short | A randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions |
title_sort | randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7588049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33104739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240985 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thomasrae arandomisedonlinesurveyexploringhowhealthconditionlabelsaffectbehaviouralintentions AT spencemarkt arandomisedonlinesurveyexploringhowhealthconditionlabelsaffectbehaviouralintentions AT royrajat arandomisedonlinesurveyexploringhowhealthconditionlabelsaffectbehaviouralintentions AT bellerelaine arandomisedonlinesurveyexploringhowhealthconditionlabelsaffectbehaviouralintentions AT thomasrae randomisedonlinesurveyexploringhowhealthconditionlabelsaffectbehaviouralintentions AT spencemarkt randomisedonlinesurveyexploringhowhealthconditionlabelsaffectbehaviouralintentions AT royrajat randomisedonlinesurveyexploringhowhealthconditionlabelsaffectbehaviouralintentions AT bellerelaine randomisedonlinesurveyexploringhowhealthconditionlabelsaffectbehaviouralintentions |