Cargando…

Patient and Economic Burden of Presbyopia: A Systematic Literature Review

PURPOSE: The objective of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to collate, report, and critique published evidence related to epidemiology and patient and economic burden of presbyopia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE(®), Embase(®), and Cochrane L...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berdahl, John, Bala, Chandra, Dhariwal, Mukesh, Lemp-Hull, Jessie, Thakker, Divyesh, Jawla, Shantanu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7588278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33116396
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S269597
_version_ 1783600340833140736
author Berdahl, John
Bala, Chandra
Dhariwal, Mukesh
Lemp-Hull, Jessie
Thakker, Divyesh
Jawla, Shantanu
author_facet Berdahl, John
Bala, Chandra
Dhariwal, Mukesh
Lemp-Hull, Jessie
Thakker, Divyesh
Jawla, Shantanu
author_sort Berdahl, John
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The objective of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to collate, report, and critique published evidence related to epidemiology and patient and economic burden of presbyopia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE(®), Embase(®), and Cochrane Library databases from the time of inception through October 2018 using Cochrane methodology. Studies published in English language reporting on epidemiology and patient and economic burden of presbyopia were included. RESULTS: Initial systematic literature search yielded 2,228 citations, of which 55 met the inclusion criteria (epidemiology, 44; patient burden, 14; economic burden, 1) and were included in this review. Globally, 1.09 billion people are estimated to be affected by presbyopia. The reported presbyopia prevalence varied across regions and by age groups, with the highest prevalence of 90% reported in the Latin America region in adults ≥35 years. Presbyopic patients report up to 22% decrease in quality-of-life (QoL) score, and up to 80% patients with uncorrected presbyopia report difficulty in performing near-vision related tasks. About 12% of presbyopes required help in performing routine activities, and these visual limitations reportedly induce distress and low self-esteem in presbyopia patients. Uncorrected presbyopia led to a 2-fold increased difficulty in near-vision-related tasks and a >8-fold increased difficulty in very demanding near-vision-related tasks. Further, uncorrected presbyopia leads to a decrement in patients’ QoL, evident by the low utility values reported in the literature. Annual global productivity losses due to uncorrected and under-corrected presbyopia in working-age population (<50 years) were estimated at US$ 11 billion (0.016% of the global domestic product (GDP) in 2011, which increased to US$ 25.4 billion if all people aged <65 years were assumed to be productive. CONCLUSION: Uncorrected presbyopia affects patients’ vision-related quality of life due to difficulty in performing near-vision-related tasks. In addition, un-/under-corrected presbyopia could lead to productivity losses in working-age adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7588278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75882782020-10-27 Patient and Economic Burden of Presbyopia: A Systematic Literature Review Berdahl, John Bala, Chandra Dhariwal, Mukesh Lemp-Hull, Jessie Thakker, Divyesh Jawla, Shantanu Clin Ophthalmol Review PURPOSE: The objective of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to collate, report, and critique published evidence related to epidemiology and patient and economic burden of presbyopia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE(®), Embase(®), and Cochrane Library databases from the time of inception through October 2018 using Cochrane methodology. Studies published in English language reporting on epidemiology and patient and economic burden of presbyopia were included. RESULTS: Initial systematic literature search yielded 2,228 citations, of which 55 met the inclusion criteria (epidemiology, 44; patient burden, 14; economic burden, 1) and were included in this review. Globally, 1.09 billion people are estimated to be affected by presbyopia. The reported presbyopia prevalence varied across regions and by age groups, with the highest prevalence of 90% reported in the Latin America region in adults ≥35 years. Presbyopic patients report up to 22% decrease in quality-of-life (QoL) score, and up to 80% patients with uncorrected presbyopia report difficulty in performing near-vision related tasks. About 12% of presbyopes required help in performing routine activities, and these visual limitations reportedly induce distress and low self-esteem in presbyopia patients. Uncorrected presbyopia led to a 2-fold increased difficulty in near-vision-related tasks and a >8-fold increased difficulty in very demanding near-vision-related tasks. Further, uncorrected presbyopia leads to a decrement in patients’ QoL, evident by the low utility values reported in the literature. Annual global productivity losses due to uncorrected and under-corrected presbyopia in working-age population (<50 years) were estimated at US$ 11 billion (0.016% of the global domestic product (GDP) in 2011, which increased to US$ 25.4 billion if all people aged <65 years were assumed to be productive. CONCLUSION: Uncorrected presbyopia affects patients’ vision-related quality of life due to difficulty in performing near-vision-related tasks. In addition, un-/under-corrected presbyopia could lead to productivity losses in working-age adults. Dove 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7588278/ /pubmed/33116396 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S269597 Text en © 2020 Berdahl et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Berdahl, John
Bala, Chandra
Dhariwal, Mukesh
Lemp-Hull, Jessie
Thakker, Divyesh
Jawla, Shantanu
Patient and Economic Burden of Presbyopia: A Systematic Literature Review
title Patient and Economic Burden of Presbyopia: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full Patient and Economic Burden of Presbyopia: A Systematic Literature Review
title_fullStr Patient and Economic Burden of Presbyopia: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Patient and Economic Burden of Presbyopia: A Systematic Literature Review
title_short Patient and Economic Burden of Presbyopia: A Systematic Literature Review
title_sort patient and economic burden of presbyopia: a systematic literature review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7588278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33116396
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S269597
work_keys_str_mv AT berdahljohn patientandeconomicburdenofpresbyopiaasystematicliteraturereview
AT balachandra patientandeconomicburdenofpresbyopiaasystematicliteraturereview
AT dhariwalmukesh patientandeconomicburdenofpresbyopiaasystematicliteraturereview
AT lemphulljessie patientandeconomicburdenofpresbyopiaasystematicliteraturereview
AT thakkerdivyesh patientandeconomicburdenofpresbyopiaasystematicliteraturereview
AT jawlashantanu patientandeconomicburdenofpresbyopiaasystematicliteraturereview