Cargando…
Patient-Reported Outcomes After Multiple-Revision ACL Reconstruction: Good but Not Great
PURPOSE: To evaluate the patient-reported and objective functional outcomes of patients undergoing multiple-revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery. The secondary purpose was to determine failure rates and factors associated with failure, with a focus on posterior tibial slo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7588625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33134992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.06.013 |
_version_ | 1783600403830538240 |
---|---|
author | Engler, Ian D. Salzler, Matthew J. Wall, Andrew J. Johnson, William R. Makani, Amun Shields, Margaret V. Gill, Thomas J. |
author_facet | Engler, Ian D. Salzler, Matthew J. Wall, Andrew J. Johnson, William R. Makani, Amun Shields, Margaret V. Gill, Thomas J. |
author_sort | Engler, Ian D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate the patient-reported and objective functional outcomes of patients undergoing multiple-revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery. The secondary purpose was to determine failure rates and factors associated with failure, with a focus on posterior tibial slope. METHODS: All patients who underwent a repeat revision ACL reconstruction with a single surgeon over a 13-year period were identified. Chart data were obtained, including radiographic findings, operative details and findings, and postoperative examination findings. Failure was defined as subjective instability with evidence of graft incompetence on physical examination and MRI. Patients completed the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form (IKDC-SKF) and Tegner Activity Level Scale. Patients who had outcomes scores completed a minimum of 2 years postoperatively were included. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were available for follow-up; 12 underwent secondary revision procedures, and 2 underwent tertiary revisions. Three patients (21%) had subsequent failure of the revision graft with mean time to failure of 27 months. Posterior tibial slope was significantly higher in the failures than in the nonfailures (13.3˚; 95% CI 10.1-16.6 versus 10.1˚; 95% CI 6.7-11.4; P = 0.049). Eleven patients completed outcomes measures at a mean of 42 months postoperatively (range 24-79 months). The mean Tegner activity score was 6.3 at follow-up, compared with 8.3 prior to the original ACL injury. The mean IKDC-SKF score was 70 at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Multiple revision ACL reconstruction surgery appears to have reasonable functional outcomes but is associated with a relatively high failure rate. Activity level following repeat revision surgery is diminished compared to the preinjury state, but most patients are able to return to recreational sports. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Study, Level IV. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7588625 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75886252020-10-30 Patient-Reported Outcomes After Multiple-Revision ACL Reconstruction: Good but Not Great Engler, Ian D. Salzler, Matthew J. Wall, Andrew J. Johnson, William R. Makani, Amun Shields, Margaret V. Gill, Thomas J. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the patient-reported and objective functional outcomes of patients undergoing multiple-revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery. The secondary purpose was to determine failure rates and factors associated with failure, with a focus on posterior tibial slope. METHODS: All patients who underwent a repeat revision ACL reconstruction with a single surgeon over a 13-year period were identified. Chart data were obtained, including radiographic findings, operative details and findings, and postoperative examination findings. Failure was defined as subjective instability with evidence of graft incompetence on physical examination and MRI. Patients completed the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form (IKDC-SKF) and Tegner Activity Level Scale. Patients who had outcomes scores completed a minimum of 2 years postoperatively were included. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were available for follow-up; 12 underwent secondary revision procedures, and 2 underwent tertiary revisions. Three patients (21%) had subsequent failure of the revision graft with mean time to failure of 27 months. Posterior tibial slope was significantly higher in the failures than in the nonfailures (13.3˚; 95% CI 10.1-16.6 versus 10.1˚; 95% CI 6.7-11.4; P = 0.049). Eleven patients completed outcomes measures at a mean of 42 months postoperatively (range 24-79 months). The mean Tegner activity score was 6.3 at follow-up, compared with 8.3 prior to the original ACL injury. The mean IKDC-SKF score was 70 at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Multiple revision ACL reconstruction surgery appears to have reasonable functional outcomes but is associated with a relatively high failure rate. Activity level following repeat revision surgery is diminished compared to the preinjury state, but most patients are able to return to recreational sports. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Study, Level IV. Elsevier 2020-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7588625/ /pubmed/33134992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.06.013 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Engler, Ian D. Salzler, Matthew J. Wall, Andrew J. Johnson, William R. Makani, Amun Shields, Margaret V. Gill, Thomas J. Patient-Reported Outcomes After Multiple-Revision ACL Reconstruction: Good but Not Great |
title | Patient-Reported Outcomes After Multiple-Revision ACL Reconstruction: Good but Not Great |
title_full | Patient-Reported Outcomes After Multiple-Revision ACL Reconstruction: Good but Not Great |
title_fullStr | Patient-Reported Outcomes After Multiple-Revision ACL Reconstruction: Good but Not Great |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient-Reported Outcomes After Multiple-Revision ACL Reconstruction: Good but Not Great |
title_short | Patient-Reported Outcomes After Multiple-Revision ACL Reconstruction: Good but Not Great |
title_sort | patient-reported outcomes after multiple-revision acl reconstruction: good but not great |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7588625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33134992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.06.013 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT engleriand patientreportedoutcomesaftermultiplerevisionaclreconstructiongoodbutnotgreat AT salzlermatthewj patientreportedoutcomesaftermultiplerevisionaclreconstructiongoodbutnotgreat AT wallandrewj patientreportedoutcomesaftermultiplerevisionaclreconstructiongoodbutnotgreat AT johnsonwilliamr patientreportedoutcomesaftermultiplerevisionaclreconstructiongoodbutnotgreat AT makaniamun patientreportedoutcomesaftermultiplerevisionaclreconstructiongoodbutnotgreat AT shieldsmargaretv patientreportedoutcomesaftermultiplerevisionaclreconstructiongoodbutnotgreat AT gillthomasj patientreportedoutcomesaftermultiplerevisionaclreconstructiongoodbutnotgreat |