Cargando…
Are published randomized clinical trials abstracts on periodontics reported adequately?
INTRODUCTION: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) remain the golden standard in biomedical research, which makes their reporting to a high quality essential to control RCTs’ internal validity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of abstract reporting of RCTs published in periodontic...
Autores principales: | Alharbi, Fahad, Almutairi, Abdullah |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7588865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33134603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100656 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reporting quality and spin in abstracts of randomized clinical trials of periodontal therapy and cardiovascular disease outcomes
por: Shaqman, Murad, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Quality assessment of randomized controlled trial abstracts on drug therapy of periodontal disease from the abstracts published in dental Science Citation Indexed journals in the last ten years
por: Xie, Lingzhi, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Assessment of the Quality of Reporting in Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Five Leading Chinese Medical Journals
por: Chen, Yaolong, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Publisher’s Note: Abstract
Publicado: (2018) -
Are CONSORT checklists submitted by authors adequately reflecting what information is actually reported in published papers?
por: Blanco, David, et al.
Publicado: (2018)