Cargando…

Comparison of Methods for Bulk Automated Simulation of Glycosidic Bond Conformations

Six empirical force fields were tested for applicability to calculations for automated carbohydrate database filling. They were probed on eleven disaccharide molecules containing representative structural features from widespread classes of carbohydrates. The accuracy of each method was queried by p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stroylov, Victor, Panova, Maria, Toukach, Philip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7589101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33076365
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207626
_version_ 1783600501081767936
author Stroylov, Victor
Panova, Maria
Toukach, Philip
author_facet Stroylov, Victor
Panova, Maria
Toukach, Philip
author_sort Stroylov, Victor
collection PubMed
description Six empirical force fields were tested for applicability to calculations for automated carbohydrate database filling. They were probed on eleven disaccharide molecules containing representative structural features from widespread classes of carbohydrates. The accuracy of each method was queried by predictions of nuclear Overhauser effects (NOEs) from conformational ensembles obtained from 50 to 100 ns molecular dynamics (MD) trajectories and their comparison to the published experimental data. Using various ranking schemes, it was concluded that explicit solvent MM3 MD yielded non-inferior NOE accuracy with newer GLYCAM-06, and ultimately PBE0-D3/def2-TZVP (Triple-Zeta Valence Polarized) Density Functional Theory (DFT) simulations. For seven of eleven molecules, at least one empirical force field with explicit solvent outperformed DFT in NOE prediction. The aggregate of characteristics (accuracy, speed, and compatibility) made MM3 dynamics with explicit solvent at 300 K the most favorable method for bulk generation of disaccharide conformation maps for massive database filling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7589101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75891012020-10-29 Comparison of Methods for Bulk Automated Simulation of Glycosidic Bond Conformations Stroylov, Victor Panova, Maria Toukach, Philip Int J Mol Sci Article Six empirical force fields were tested for applicability to calculations for automated carbohydrate database filling. They were probed on eleven disaccharide molecules containing representative structural features from widespread classes of carbohydrates. The accuracy of each method was queried by predictions of nuclear Overhauser effects (NOEs) from conformational ensembles obtained from 50 to 100 ns molecular dynamics (MD) trajectories and their comparison to the published experimental data. Using various ranking schemes, it was concluded that explicit solvent MM3 MD yielded non-inferior NOE accuracy with newer GLYCAM-06, and ultimately PBE0-D3/def2-TZVP (Triple-Zeta Valence Polarized) Density Functional Theory (DFT) simulations. For seven of eleven molecules, at least one empirical force field with explicit solvent outperformed DFT in NOE prediction. The aggregate of characteristics (accuracy, speed, and compatibility) made MM3 dynamics with explicit solvent at 300 K the most favorable method for bulk generation of disaccharide conformation maps for massive database filling. MDPI 2020-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7589101/ /pubmed/33076365 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207626 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Stroylov, Victor
Panova, Maria
Toukach, Philip
Comparison of Methods for Bulk Automated Simulation of Glycosidic Bond Conformations
title Comparison of Methods for Bulk Automated Simulation of Glycosidic Bond Conformations
title_full Comparison of Methods for Bulk Automated Simulation of Glycosidic Bond Conformations
title_fullStr Comparison of Methods for Bulk Automated Simulation of Glycosidic Bond Conformations
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Methods for Bulk Automated Simulation of Glycosidic Bond Conformations
title_short Comparison of Methods for Bulk Automated Simulation of Glycosidic Bond Conformations
title_sort comparison of methods for bulk automated simulation of glycosidic bond conformations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7589101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33076365
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207626
work_keys_str_mv AT stroylovvictor comparisonofmethodsforbulkautomatedsimulationofglycosidicbondconformations
AT panovamaria comparisonofmethodsforbulkautomatedsimulationofglycosidicbondconformations
AT toukachphilip comparisonofmethodsforbulkautomatedsimulationofglycosidicbondconformations