Cargando…

Examining the use of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in routine antenatal practice: multistakeholder feedback to implementation

OBJECTIVE: To gain insights from pregnant women and obstetricians on the utility of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in antenatal practice. METHODS: Women were recruited from the antenatal department of a large tertiary‐level university maternity hospital in Dublin, Ireland, between October and December...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Killeen, Sarah Louise, Callaghan, Shauna L., Jacob, Chandni Maria, Hanson, Mark A., McAuliffe, Fionnuala M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7589336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32894589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13323
_version_ 1783600555465113600
author Killeen, Sarah Louise
Callaghan, Shauna L.
Jacob, Chandni Maria
Hanson, Mark A.
McAuliffe, Fionnuala M.
author_facet Killeen, Sarah Louise
Callaghan, Shauna L.
Jacob, Chandni Maria
Hanson, Mark A.
McAuliffe, Fionnuala M.
author_sort Killeen, Sarah Louise
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To gain insights from pregnant women and obstetricians on the utility of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in antenatal practice. METHODS: Women were recruited from the antenatal department of a large tertiary‐level university maternity hospital in Dublin, Ireland, between October and December 2019. Participants completed the FIGO Nutrition Checklist before their routine antenatal appointment. Obstetricians and women were encouraged to discuss the FIGO Nutrition Checklist during the clinical visit. Completed FIGO Nutrition Checklists were collected after appointments. Acceptability was assessed through questionnaires. RESULTS: The majority (80.0%) of women answered “No” to at least one diet quality question, indicating a potential nutritional risk. While none of the participating obstetricians routinely discussed nutrition with women, all agreed that using the Checklist encouraged them to address nutrition with pregnant women. Nearly every woman (99.0%) found the Checklist quick to complete; however, all participating obstetricians felt there was not enough time to discuss it in routine practice. Despite this, most obstetricians and pregnant women recommended the FIGO Nutrition Checklist for use. CONCLUSION: The FIGO Nutrition Checklist is acceptable for use in routine antenatal practice in tertiary care settings. It helped identify potentially at‐risk women during early pregnancy and facilitated conversations related to optimum diet.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7589336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75893362020-10-30 Examining the use of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in routine antenatal practice: multistakeholder feedback to implementation Killeen, Sarah Louise Callaghan, Shauna L. Jacob, Chandni Maria Hanson, Mark A. McAuliffe, Fionnuala M. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Clinical Articles OBJECTIVE: To gain insights from pregnant women and obstetricians on the utility of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in antenatal practice. METHODS: Women were recruited from the antenatal department of a large tertiary‐level university maternity hospital in Dublin, Ireland, between October and December 2019. Participants completed the FIGO Nutrition Checklist before their routine antenatal appointment. Obstetricians and women were encouraged to discuss the FIGO Nutrition Checklist during the clinical visit. Completed FIGO Nutrition Checklists were collected after appointments. Acceptability was assessed through questionnaires. RESULTS: The majority (80.0%) of women answered “No” to at least one diet quality question, indicating a potential nutritional risk. While none of the participating obstetricians routinely discussed nutrition with women, all agreed that using the Checklist encouraged them to address nutrition with pregnant women. Nearly every woman (99.0%) found the Checklist quick to complete; however, all participating obstetricians felt there was not enough time to discuss it in routine practice. Despite this, most obstetricians and pregnant women recommended the FIGO Nutrition Checklist for use. CONCLUSION: The FIGO Nutrition Checklist is acceptable for use in routine antenatal practice in tertiary care settings. It helped identify potentially at‐risk women during early pregnancy and facilitated conversations related to optimum diet. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-07 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7589336/ /pubmed/32894589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13323 Text en © 2020 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Articles
Killeen, Sarah Louise
Callaghan, Shauna L.
Jacob, Chandni Maria
Hanson, Mark A.
McAuliffe, Fionnuala M.
Examining the use of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in routine antenatal practice: multistakeholder feedback to implementation
title Examining the use of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in routine antenatal practice: multistakeholder feedback to implementation
title_full Examining the use of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in routine antenatal practice: multistakeholder feedback to implementation
title_fullStr Examining the use of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in routine antenatal practice: multistakeholder feedback to implementation
title_full_unstemmed Examining the use of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in routine antenatal practice: multistakeholder feedback to implementation
title_short Examining the use of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in routine antenatal practice: multistakeholder feedback to implementation
title_sort examining the use of the figo nutrition checklist in routine antenatal practice: multistakeholder feedback to implementation
topic Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7589336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32894589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13323
work_keys_str_mv AT killeensarahlouise examiningtheuseofthefigonutritionchecklistinroutineantenatalpracticemultistakeholderfeedbacktoimplementation
AT callaghanshaunal examiningtheuseofthefigonutritionchecklistinroutineantenatalpracticemultistakeholderfeedbacktoimplementation
AT jacobchandnimaria examiningtheuseofthefigonutritionchecklistinroutineantenatalpracticemultistakeholderfeedbacktoimplementation
AT hansonmarka examiningtheuseofthefigonutritionchecklistinroutineantenatalpracticemultistakeholderfeedbacktoimplementation
AT mcauliffefionnualam examiningtheuseofthefigonutritionchecklistinroutineantenatalpracticemultistakeholderfeedbacktoimplementation