Cargando…
Examining the use of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in routine antenatal practice: multistakeholder feedback to implementation
OBJECTIVE: To gain insights from pregnant women and obstetricians on the utility of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in antenatal practice. METHODS: Women were recruited from the antenatal department of a large tertiary‐level university maternity hospital in Dublin, Ireland, between October and December...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7589336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32894589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13323 |
_version_ | 1783600555465113600 |
---|---|
author | Killeen, Sarah Louise Callaghan, Shauna L. Jacob, Chandni Maria Hanson, Mark A. McAuliffe, Fionnuala M. |
author_facet | Killeen, Sarah Louise Callaghan, Shauna L. Jacob, Chandni Maria Hanson, Mark A. McAuliffe, Fionnuala M. |
author_sort | Killeen, Sarah Louise |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To gain insights from pregnant women and obstetricians on the utility of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in antenatal practice. METHODS: Women were recruited from the antenatal department of a large tertiary‐level university maternity hospital in Dublin, Ireland, between October and December 2019. Participants completed the FIGO Nutrition Checklist before their routine antenatal appointment. Obstetricians and women were encouraged to discuss the FIGO Nutrition Checklist during the clinical visit. Completed FIGO Nutrition Checklists were collected after appointments. Acceptability was assessed through questionnaires. RESULTS: The majority (80.0%) of women answered “No” to at least one diet quality question, indicating a potential nutritional risk. While none of the participating obstetricians routinely discussed nutrition with women, all agreed that using the Checklist encouraged them to address nutrition with pregnant women. Nearly every woman (99.0%) found the Checklist quick to complete; however, all participating obstetricians felt there was not enough time to discuss it in routine practice. Despite this, most obstetricians and pregnant women recommended the FIGO Nutrition Checklist for use. CONCLUSION: The FIGO Nutrition Checklist is acceptable for use in routine antenatal practice in tertiary care settings. It helped identify potentially at‐risk women during early pregnancy and facilitated conversations related to optimum diet. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7589336 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75893362020-10-30 Examining the use of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in routine antenatal practice: multistakeholder feedback to implementation Killeen, Sarah Louise Callaghan, Shauna L. Jacob, Chandni Maria Hanson, Mark A. McAuliffe, Fionnuala M. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Clinical Articles OBJECTIVE: To gain insights from pregnant women and obstetricians on the utility of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in antenatal practice. METHODS: Women were recruited from the antenatal department of a large tertiary‐level university maternity hospital in Dublin, Ireland, between October and December 2019. Participants completed the FIGO Nutrition Checklist before their routine antenatal appointment. Obstetricians and women were encouraged to discuss the FIGO Nutrition Checklist during the clinical visit. Completed FIGO Nutrition Checklists were collected after appointments. Acceptability was assessed through questionnaires. RESULTS: The majority (80.0%) of women answered “No” to at least one diet quality question, indicating a potential nutritional risk. While none of the participating obstetricians routinely discussed nutrition with women, all agreed that using the Checklist encouraged them to address nutrition with pregnant women. Nearly every woman (99.0%) found the Checklist quick to complete; however, all participating obstetricians felt there was not enough time to discuss it in routine practice. Despite this, most obstetricians and pregnant women recommended the FIGO Nutrition Checklist for use. CONCLUSION: The FIGO Nutrition Checklist is acceptable for use in routine antenatal practice in tertiary care settings. It helped identify potentially at‐risk women during early pregnancy and facilitated conversations related to optimum diet. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-07 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7589336/ /pubmed/32894589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13323 Text en © 2020 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Articles Killeen, Sarah Louise Callaghan, Shauna L. Jacob, Chandni Maria Hanson, Mark A. McAuliffe, Fionnuala M. Examining the use of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in routine antenatal practice: multistakeholder feedback to implementation |
title | Examining the use of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in routine antenatal practice: multistakeholder feedback to implementation |
title_full | Examining the use of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in routine antenatal practice: multistakeholder feedback to implementation |
title_fullStr | Examining the use of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in routine antenatal practice: multistakeholder feedback to implementation |
title_full_unstemmed | Examining the use of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in routine antenatal practice: multistakeholder feedback to implementation |
title_short | Examining the use of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in routine antenatal practice: multistakeholder feedback to implementation |
title_sort | examining the use of the figo nutrition checklist in routine antenatal practice: multistakeholder feedback to implementation |
topic | Clinical Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7589336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32894589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13323 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT killeensarahlouise examiningtheuseofthefigonutritionchecklistinroutineantenatalpracticemultistakeholderfeedbacktoimplementation AT callaghanshaunal examiningtheuseofthefigonutritionchecklistinroutineantenatalpracticemultistakeholderfeedbacktoimplementation AT jacobchandnimaria examiningtheuseofthefigonutritionchecklistinroutineantenatalpracticemultistakeholderfeedbacktoimplementation AT hansonmarka examiningtheuseofthefigonutritionchecklistinroutineantenatalpracticemultistakeholderfeedbacktoimplementation AT mcauliffefionnualam examiningtheuseofthefigonutritionchecklistinroutineantenatalpracticemultistakeholderfeedbacktoimplementation |