Cargando…
Impact of the “Sling Shot” Supportive Device on Upper-Body Neuromuscular Activity during the Bench Press Exercise
The aim of this study was to compare the muscle activity between the sling shot assisted (SS) and control (CONT) flat barbell bench press for selected external loads of 70%, 85%, 100% one-repetition maximum (1RM). Ten resistance-trained men participated in the study (age = 22.2 ± 1.9 years, body mas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7589754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33096856 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207695 |
_version_ | 1783600651789402112 |
---|---|
author | Wojdala, Grzegorz Golas, Artur Krzysztofik, Michal Lockie, Robert George Roczniok, Robert Zajac, Adam Wilk, Michal |
author_facet | Wojdala, Grzegorz Golas, Artur Krzysztofik, Michal Lockie, Robert George Roczniok, Robert Zajac, Adam Wilk, Michal |
author_sort | Wojdala, Grzegorz |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to compare the muscle activity between the sling shot assisted (SS) and control (CONT) flat barbell bench press for selected external loads of 70%, 85%, 100% one-repetition maximum (1RM). Ten resistance-trained men participated in the study (age = 22.2 ± 1.9 years, body mass = 88.7 ± 11.2 kg, body height = 179.5 ± 4.1, 1RM in the bench press = 127.25 ± 25.86 kg, and strength training experience = 6 ± 2.5 years). Evaluation of peak muscle activity of the dominant body side was carried out using surface electromyography (sEMG) recorded for the triceps brachii, pectoralis major, and anterior deltoid during each attempt. The three-way repeated measure ANOVA revealed statistically significant main interaction for condition x muscle group (p < 0.01; η(2) = 0.569); load x muscle group (p < 0.01; η(2) = 0.709); and condition x load (p < 0.01; η(2) = 0.418). A main effect was also observed for condition (p < 0.01; η(2) = 0.968); load (p < 0.01; η(2) = 0.976); and muscle group (p < 0.01; η(2) = 0.977). The post hoc analysis for the main effect of the condition indicated statistically significant decrease in %MVIC for the SS compared to CONT condition (74.9 vs. 88.9%MVIC; p < 0.01; ES = 0.39). The results of this study showed that using the SS significantly affects the muscle activity pattern of the flat bench press and results in its acute decrease in comparison to an equal load under CONT conditions. The SS device may be an effective tool both in rehabilitation and strength training protocols by increasing stability with a reduction of muscular activity of the prime movers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7589754 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75897542020-10-29 Impact of the “Sling Shot” Supportive Device on Upper-Body Neuromuscular Activity during the Bench Press Exercise Wojdala, Grzegorz Golas, Artur Krzysztofik, Michal Lockie, Robert George Roczniok, Robert Zajac, Adam Wilk, Michal Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The aim of this study was to compare the muscle activity between the sling shot assisted (SS) and control (CONT) flat barbell bench press for selected external loads of 70%, 85%, 100% one-repetition maximum (1RM). Ten resistance-trained men participated in the study (age = 22.2 ± 1.9 years, body mass = 88.7 ± 11.2 kg, body height = 179.5 ± 4.1, 1RM in the bench press = 127.25 ± 25.86 kg, and strength training experience = 6 ± 2.5 years). Evaluation of peak muscle activity of the dominant body side was carried out using surface electromyography (sEMG) recorded for the triceps brachii, pectoralis major, and anterior deltoid during each attempt. The three-way repeated measure ANOVA revealed statistically significant main interaction for condition x muscle group (p < 0.01; η(2) = 0.569); load x muscle group (p < 0.01; η(2) = 0.709); and condition x load (p < 0.01; η(2) = 0.418). A main effect was also observed for condition (p < 0.01; η(2) = 0.968); load (p < 0.01; η(2) = 0.976); and muscle group (p < 0.01; η(2) = 0.977). The post hoc analysis for the main effect of the condition indicated statistically significant decrease in %MVIC for the SS compared to CONT condition (74.9 vs. 88.9%MVIC; p < 0.01; ES = 0.39). The results of this study showed that using the SS significantly affects the muscle activity pattern of the flat bench press and results in its acute decrease in comparison to an equal load under CONT conditions. The SS device may be an effective tool both in rehabilitation and strength training protocols by increasing stability with a reduction of muscular activity of the prime movers. MDPI 2020-10-21 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7589754/ /pubmed/33096856 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207695 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wojdala, Grzegorz Golas, Artur Krzysztofik, Michal Lockie, Robert George Roczniok, Robert Zajac, Adam Wilk, Michal Impact of the “Sling Shot” Supportive Device on Upper-Body Neuromuscular Activity during the Bench Press Exercise |
title | Impact of the “Sling Shot” Supportive Device on Upper-Body Neuromuscular Activity during the Bench Press Exercise |
title_full | Impact of the “Sling Shot” Supportive Device on Upper-Body Neuromuscular Activity during the Bench Press Exercise |
title_fullStr | Impact of the “Sling Shot” Supportive Device on Upper-Body Neuromuscular Activity during the Bench Press Exercise |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of the “Sling Shot” Supportive Device on Upper-Body Neuromuscular Activity during the Bench Press Exercise |
title_short | Impact of the “Sling Shot” Supportive Device on Upper-Body Neuromuscular Activity during the Bench Press Exercise |
title_sort | impact of the “sling shot” supportive device on upper-body neuromuscular activity during the bench press exercise |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7589754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33096856 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207695 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wojdalagrzegorz impactoftheslingshotsupportivedeviceonupperbodyneuromuscularactivityduringthebenchpressexercise AT golasartur impactoftheslingshotsupportivedeviceonupperbodyneuromuscularactivityduringthebenchpressexercise AT krzysztofikmichal impactoftheslingshotsupportivedeviceonupperbodyneuromuscularactivityduringthebenchpressexercise AT lockierobertgeorge impactoftheslingshotsupportivedeviceonupperbodyneuromuscularactivityduringthebenchpressexercise AT roczniokrobert impactoftheslingshotsupportivedeviceonupperbodyneuromuscularactivityduringthebenchpressexercise AT zajacadam impactoftheslingshotsupportivedeviceonupperbodyneuromuscularactivityduringthebenchpressexercise AT wilkmichal impactoftheslingshotsupportivedeviceonupperbodyneuromuscularactivityduringthebenchpressexercise |