Cargando…

Impact of the “Sling Shot” Supportive Device on Upper-Body Neuromuscular Activity during the Bench Press Exercise

The aim of this study was to compare the muscle activity between the sling shot assisted (SS) and control (CONT) flat barbell bench press for selected external loads of 70%, 85%, 100% one-repetition maximum (1RM). Ten resistance-trained men participated in the study (age = 22.2 ± 1.9 years, body mas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wojdala, Grzegorz, Golas, Artur, Krzysztofik, Michal, Lockie, Robert George, Roczniok, Robert, Zajac, Adam, Wilk, Michal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7589754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33096856
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207695
_version_ 1783600651789402112
author Wojdala, Grzegorz
Golas, Artur
Krzysztofik, Michal
Lockie, Robert George
Roczniok, Robert
Zajac, Adam
Wilk, Michal
author_facet Wojdala, Grzegorz
Golas, Artur
Krzysztofik, Michal
Lockie, Robert George
Roczniok, Robert
Zajac, Adam
Wilk, Michal
author_sort Wojdala, Grzegorz
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to compare the muscle activity between the sling shot assisted (SS) and control (CONT) flat barbell bench press for selected external loads of 70%, 85%, 100% one-repetition maximum (1RM). Ten resistance-trained men participated in the study (age = 22.2 ± 1.9 years, body mass = 88.7 ± 11.2 kg, body height = 179.5 ± 4.1, 1RM in the bench press = 127.25 ± 25.86 kg, and strength training experience = 6 ± 2.5 years). Evaluation of peak muscle activity of the dominant body side was carried out using surface electromyography (sEMG) recorded for the triceps brachii, pectoralis major, and anterior deltoid during each attempt. The three-way repeated measure ANOVA revealed statistically significant main interaction for condition x muscle group (p < 0.01; η(2) = 0.569); load x muscle group (p < 0.01; η(2) = 0.709); and condition x load (p < 0.01; η(2) = 0.418). A main effect was also observed for condition (p < 0.01; η(2) = 0.968); load (p < 0.01; η(2) = 0.976); and muscle group (p < 0.01; η(2) = 0.977). The post hoc analysis for the main effect of the condition indicated statistically significant decrease in %MVIC for the SS compared to CONT condition (74.9 vs. 88.9%MVIC; p < 0.01; ES = 0.39). The results of this study showed that using the SS significantly affects the muscle activity pattern of the flat bench press and results in its acute decrease in comparison to an equal load under CONT conditions. The SS device may be an effective tool both in rehabilitation and strength training protocols by increasing stability with a reduction of muscular activity of the prime movers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7589754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75897542020-10-29 Impact of the “Sling Shot” Supportive Device on Upper-Body Neuromuscular Activity during the Bench Press Exercise Wojdala, Grzegorz Golas, Artur Krzysztofik, Michal Lockie, Robert George Roczniok, Robert Zajac, Adam Wilk, Michal Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The aim of this study was to compare the muscle activity between the sling shot assisted (SS) and control (CONT) flat barbell bench press for selected external loads of 70%, 85%, 100% one-repetition maximum (1RM). Ten resistance-trained men participated in the study (age = 22.2 ± 1.9 years, body mass = 88.7 ± 11.2 kg, body height = 179.5 ± 4.1, 1RM in the bench press = 127.25 ± 25.86 kg, and strength training experience = 6 ± 2.5 years). Evaluation of peak muscle activity of the dominant body side was carried out using surface electromyography (sEMG) recorded for the triceps brachii, pectoralis major, and anterior deltoid during each attempt. The three-way repeated measure ANOVA revealed statistically significant main interaction for condition x muscle group (p < 0.01; η(2) = 0.569); load x muscle group (p < 0.01; η(2) = 0.709); and condition x load (p < 0.01; η(2) = 0.418). A main effect was also observed for condition (p < 0.01; η(2) = 0.968); load (p < 0.01; η(2) = 0.976); and muscle group (p < 0.01; η(2) = 0.977). The post hoc analysis for the main effect of the condition indicated statistically significant decrease in %MVIC for the SS compared to CONT condition (74.9 vs. 88.9%MVIC; p < 0.01; ES = 0.39). The results of this study showed that using the SS significantly affects the muscle activity pattern of the flat bench press and results in its acute decrease in comparison to an equal load under CONT conditions. The SS device may be an effective tool both in rehabilitation and strength training protocols by increasing stability with a reduction of muscular activity of the prime movers. MDPI 2020-10-21 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7589754/ /pubmed/33096856 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207695 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wojdala, Grzegorz
Golas, Artur
Krzysztofik, Michal
Lockie, Robert George
Roczniok, Robert
Zajac, Adam
Wilk, Michal
Impact of the “Sling Shot” Supportive Device on Upper-Body Neuromuscular Activity during the Bench Press Exercise
title Impact of the “Sling Shot” Supportive Device on Upper-Body Neuromuscular Activity during the Bench Press Exercise
title_full Impact of the “Sling Shot” Supportive Device on Upper-Body Neuromuscular Activity during the Bench Press Exercise
title_fullStr Impact of the “Sling Shot” Supportive Device on Upper-Body Neuromuscular Activity during the Bench Press Exercise
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the “Sling Shot” Supportive Device on Upper-Body Neuromuscular Activity during the Bench Press Exercise
title_short Impact of the “Sling Shot” Supportive Device on Upper-Body Neuromuscular Activity during the Bench Press Exercise
title_sort impact of the “sling shot” supportive device on upper-body neuromuscular activity during the bench press exercise
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7589754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33096856
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207695
work_keys_str_mv AT wojdalagrzegorz impactoftheslingshotsupportivedeviceonupperbodyneuromuscularactivityduringthebenchpressexercise
AT golasartur impactoftheslingshotsupportivedeviceonupperbodyneuromuscularactivityduringthebenchpressexercise
AT krzysztofikmichal impactoftheslingshotsupportivedeviceonupperbodyneuromuscularactivityduringthebenchpressexercise
AT lockierobertgeorge impactoftheslingshotsupportivedeviceonupperbodyneuromuscularactivityduringthebenchpressexercise
AT roczniokrobert impactoftheslingshotsupportivedeviceonupperbodyneuromuscularactivityduringthebenchpressexercise
AT zajacadam impactoftheslingshotsupportivedeviceonupperbodyneuromuscularactivityduringthebenchpressexercise
AT wilkmichal impactoftheslingshotsupportivedeviceonupperbodyneuromuscularactivityduringthebenchpressexercise