Cargando…

A randomized phase 2 trial of pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab and acalabrutinib in patients with platinum‐resistant metastatic urothelial cancer

BACKGROUND: Inhibition of the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‐1) pathway has demonstrated clinical benefit in metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC); however, response rates of 15% to 26% highlight the need for more effective therapies. Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibition may suppress myeloid‐de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Tian, Harrison, Michael R., O'Donnell, Peter H., Alva, Ajjai S., Hahn, Noah M., Appleman, Leonard J., Cetnar, Jeremy, Burke, John M., Fleming, Mark T., Milowsky, Matthew I., Mortazavi, Amir, Shore, Neal, Sonpavde, Guru P., Schmidt, Emmett V., Bitman, Bojena, Munugalavadla, Veerendra, Izumi, Raquel, Patel, Priti, Staats, Janet, Chan, Cliburn, Weinhold, Kent J., George, Daniel J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32757302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33067
_version_ 1783600735004393472
author Zhang, Tian
Harrison, Michael R.
O'Donnell, Peter H.
Alva, Ajjai S.
Hahn, Noah M.
Appleman, Leonard J.
Cetnar, Jeremy
Burke, John M.
Fleming, Mark T.
Milowsky, Matthew I.
Mortazavi, Amir
Shore, Neal
Sonpavde, Guru P.
Schmidt, Emmett V.
Bitman, Bojena
Munugalavadla, Veerendra
Izumi, Raquel
Patel, Priti
Staats, Janet
Chan, Cliburn
Weinhold, Kent J.
George, Daniel J.
author_facet Zhang, Tian
Harrison, Michael R.
O'Donnell, Peter H.
Alva, Ajjai S.
Hahn, Noah M.
Appleman, Leonard J.
Cetnar, Jeremy
Burke, John M.
Fleming, Mark T.
Milowsky, Matthew I.
Mortazavi, Amir
Shore, Neal
Sonpavde, Guru P.
Schmidt, Emmett V.
Bitman, Bojena
Munugalavadla, Veerendra
Izumi, Raquel
Patel, Priti
Staats, Janet
Chan, Cliburn
Weinhold, Kent J.
George, Daniel J.
author_sort Zhang, Tian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inhibition of the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‐1) pathway has demonstrated clinical benefit in metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC); however, response rates of 15% to 26% highlight the need for more effective therapies. Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibition may suppress myeloid‐derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and improve T‐cell activation. METHODS: The Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Acalabrutinib and Pembrolizumab Immunotherapy Dual Checkpoint Inhibition in Platinum‐Resistant Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (RAPID CHECK; also known as ACE‐ST‐005) was a randomized phase 2 trial evaluating the PD‐1 inhibitor pembrolizumab with or without the BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib for patients with platinum‐refractory mUC. The primary objectives were safety and objective response rates (ORRs) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Immune profiling was performed to analyze circulating monocytic MDSCs and T cells. RESULTS: Seventy‐five patients were treated with pembrolizumab (n = 35) or pembrolizumab plus acalabrutinib (n = 40). The ORR was 26% with pembrolizumab (9% with a complete response [CR]) and 20% with pembrolizumab plus acalabrutinib (10% with a CR). The grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) that occurred in ≥15% of the patients were anemia (20%) with pembrolizumab and fatigue (23%), increased alanine aminotransferase (23%), urinary tract infections (18%), and anemia (18%) with pembrolizumab plus acalabrutinib. One patient treated with pembrolizumab plus acalabrutinib had high MDSCs at the baseline, which significantly decreased at week 7. Overall, MDSCs were not correlated with a clinical response, but some subsets of CD8+ T cells did increase during the combination treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Both treatments were generally well tolerated, although serious AE rates were higher with the combination. Acalabrutinib plus pembrolizumab did not improve the ORR, PFS, or OS in comparison with pembrolizumab alone in mUC. Baseline and on‐treatment peripheral monocytic MDSCs were not different in the treatment cohorts. Proliferating CD8+ T‐cell subsets increased during treatment, particularly in the combination cohort. Ongoing studies are correlating these peripheral immunome findings with tissue‐based immune cell infiltration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7590121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75901212020-10-30 A randomized phase 2 trial of pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab and acalabrutinib in patients with platinum‐resistant metastatic urothelial cancer Zhang, Tian Harrison, Michael R. O'Donnell, Peter H. Alva, Ajjai S. Hahn, Noah M. Appleman, Leonard J. Cetnar, Jeremy Burke, John M. Fleming, Mark T. Milowsky, Matthew I. Mortazavi, Amir Shore, Neal Sonpavde, Guru P. Schmidt, Emmett V. Bitman, Bojena Munugalavadla, Veerendra Izumi, Raquel Patel, Priti Staats, Janet Chan, Cliburn Weinhold, Kent J. George, Daniel J. Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: Inhibition of the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‐1) pathway has demonstrated clinical benefit in metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC); however, response rates of 15% to 26% highlight the need for more effective therapies. Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibition may suppress myeloid‐derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and improve T‐cell activation. METHODS: The Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Acalabrutinib and Pembrolizumab Immunotherapy Dual Checkpoint Inhibition in Platinum‐Resistant Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (RAPID CHECK; also known as ACE‐ST‐005) was a randomized phase 2 trial evaluating the PD‐1 inhibitor pembrolizumab with or without the BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib for patients with platinum‐refractory mUC. The primary objectives were safety and objective response rates (ORRs) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Immune profiling was performed to analyze circulating monocytic MDSCs and T cells. RESULTS: Seventy‐five patients were treated with pembrolizumab (n = 35) or pembrolizumab plus acalabrutinib (n = 40). The ORR was 26% with pembrolizumab (9% with a complete response [CR]) and 20% with pembrolizumab plus acalabrutinib (10% with a CR). The grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) that occurred in ≥15% of the patients were anemia (20%) with pembrolizumab and fatigue (23%), increased alanine aminotransferase (23%), urinary tract infections (18%), and anemia (18%) with pembrolizumab plus acalabrutinib. One patient treated with pembrolizumab plus acalabrutinib had high MDSCs at the baseline, which significantly decreased at week 7. Overall, MDSCs were not correlated with a clinical response, but some subsets of CD8+ T cells did increase during the combination treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Both treatments were generally well tolerated, although serious AE rates were higher with the combination. Acalabrutinib plus pembrolizumab did not improve the ORR, PFS, or OS in comparison with pembrolizumab alone in mUC. Baseline and on‐treatment peripheral monocytic MDSCs were not different in the treatment cohorts. Proliferating CD8+ T‐cell subsets increased during treatment, particularly in the combination cohort. Ongoing studies are correlating these peripheral immunome findings with tissue‐based immune cell infiltration. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-05 2020-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7590121/ /pubmed/32757302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33067 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Zhang, Tian
Harrison, Michael R.
O'Donnell, Peter H.
Alva, Ajjai S.
Hahn, Noah M.
Appleman, Leonard J.
Cetnar, Jeremy
Burke, John M.
Fleming, Mark T.
Milowsky, Matthew I.
Mortazavi, Amir
Shore, Neal
Sonpavde, Guru P.
Schmidt, Emmett V.
Bitman, Bojena
Munugalavadla, Veerendra
Izumi, Raquel
Patel, Priti
Staats, Janet
Chan, Cliburn
Weinhold, Kent J.
George, Daniel J.
A randomized phase 2 trial of pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab and acalabrutinib in patients with platinum‐resistant metastatic urothelial cancer
title A randomized phase 2 trial of pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab and acalabrutinib in patients with platinum‐resistant metastatic urothelial cancer
title_full A randomized phase 2 trial of pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab and acalabrutinib in patients with platinum‐resistant metastatic urothelial cancer
title_fullStr A randomized phase 2 trial of pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab and acalabrutinib in patients with platinum‐resistant metastatic urothelial cancer
title_full_unstemmed A randomized phase 2 trial of pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab and acalabrutinib in patients with platinum‐resistant metastatic urothelial cancer
title_short A randomized phase 2 trial of pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab and acalabrutinib in patients with platinum‐resistant metastatic urothelial cancer
title_sort randomized phase 2 trial of pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab and acalabrutinib in patients with platinum‐resistant metastatic urothelial cancer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32757302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33067
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangtian arandomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT harrisonmichaelr arandomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT odonnellpeterh arandomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT alvaajjais arandomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT hahnnoahm arandomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT applemanleonardj arandomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT cetnarjeremy arandomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT burkejohnm arandomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT flemingmarkt arandomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT milowskymatthewi arandomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT mortazaviamir arandomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT shoreneal arandomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT sonpavdegurup arandomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT schmidtemmettv arandomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT bitmanbojena arandomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT munugalavadlaveerendra arandomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT izumiraquel arandomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT patelpriti arandomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT staatsjanet arandomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT chancliburn arandomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT weinholdkentj arandomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT georgedanielj arandomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT zhangtian randomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT harrisonmichaelr randomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT odonnellpeterh randomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT alvaajjais randomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT hahnnoahm randomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT applemanleonardj randomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT cetnarjeremy randomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT burkejohnm randomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT flemingmarkt randomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT milowskymatthewi randomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT mortazaviamir randomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT shoreneal randomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT sonpavdegurup randomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT schmidtemmettv randomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT bitmanbojena randomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT munugalavadlaveerendra randomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT izumiraquel randomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT patelpriti randomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT staatsjanet randomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT chancliburn randomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT weinholdkentj randomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer
AT georgedanielj randomizedphase2trialofpembrolizumabversuspembrolizumabandacalabrutinibinpatientswithplatinumresistantmetastaticurothelialcancer