Cargando…

Preventing venous thromboembolism in oncology practice: Use of risk assessment and anticoagulation prophylaxis

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Expert consensus recommends a risk‐based approach to guide prophylactic anticoagulation to prevent VTE in ambulatory patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy. However, oncology practice...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin, Karlyn A., Molsberry, Rebecca, Khan, Sadiya S., Linder, Jeffrey A., Cameron, Kenzie A., Benson, Al
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33134786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12431
_version_ 1783600765850353664
author Martin, Karlyn A.
Molsberry, Rebecca
Khan, Sadiya S.
Linder, Jeffrey A.
Cameron, Kenzie A.
Benson, Al
author_facet Martin, Karlyn A.
Molsberry, Rebecca
Khan, Sadiya S.
Linder, Jeffrey A.
Cameron, Kenzie A.
Benson, Al
author_sort Martin, Karlyn A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Expert consensus recommends a risk‐based approach to guide prophylactic anticoagulation to prevent VTE in ambulatory patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy. However, oncology practice patterns for VTE prevention remain unclear. PATIENTS/METHODS: We conducted (i) a retrospective, single‐center cohort study of patients with pancreatic and gastric cancers to examine rates of prophylactic anticoagulation prescription for eligible patients at high risk of VTE based on the validated Khorana score, and (ii) a 15‐question survey of oncology clinicians at the same institution to assess current practice patterns and knowledge regarding VTE risk assessment and primary thromboprophylaxis in February 2020. RESULTS: Of 437 patients who met study criteria, 181 (41%) had a score of ≥ 3 (high‐risk), and none had an anticoagulation prescription for prophylaxis without an alternate treatment indication. In a survey sent to 98 oncology clinicians, of which 34 participated, 67% were unfamiliar with the Khorana score or guideline recommendations regarding risk‐based VTE prophylaxis, and 90% “never” or “rarely” used VTE risk assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Despite available evidence and existing guideline recommendations for VTE risk assessment for ambulatory patients with cancer, and primary prophylaxis for high‐risk patients, this study demonstrates that there is limited uptake in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7590270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75902702020-10-30 Preventing venous thromboembolism in oncology practice: Use of risk assessment and anticoagulation prophylaxis Martin, Karlyn A. Molsberry, Rebecca Khan, Sadiya S. Linder, Jeffrey A. Cameron, Kenzie A. Benson, Al Res Pract Thromb Haemost Original Articles ‐ Thrombosis BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Expert consensus recommends a risk‐based approach to guide prophylactic anticoagulation to prevent VTE in ambulatory patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy. However, oncology practice patterns for VTE prevention remain unclear. PATIENTS/METHODS: We conducted (i) a retrospective, single‐center cohort study of patients with pancreatic and gastric cancers to examine rates of prophylactic anticoagulation prescription for eligible patients at high risk of VTE based on the validated Khorana score, and (ii) a 15‐question survey of oncology clinicians at the same institution to assess current practice patterns and knowledge regarding VTE risk assessment and primary thromboprophylaxis in February 2020. RESULTS: Of 437 patients who met study criteria, 181 (41%) had a score of ≥ 3 (high‐risk), and none had an anticoagulation prescription for prophylaxis without an alternate treatment indication. In a survey sent to 98 oncology clinicians, of which 34 participated, 67% were unfamiliar with the Khorana score or guideline recommendations regarding risk‐based VTE prophylaxis, and 90% “never” or “rarely” used VTE risk assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Despite available evidence and existing guideline recommendations for VTE risk assessment for ambulatory patients with cancer, and primary prophylaxis for high‐risk patients, this study demonstrates that there is limited uptake in clinical practice. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7590270/ /pubmed/33134786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12431 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles ‐ Thrombosis
Martin, Karlyn A.
Molsberry, Rebecca
Khan, Sadiya S.
Linder, Jeffrey A.
Cameron, Kenzie A.
Benson, Al
Preventing venous thromboembolism in oncology practice: Use of risk assessment and anticoagulation prophylaxis
title Preventing venous thromboembolism in oncology practice: Use of risk assessment and anticoagulation prophylaxis
title_full Preventing venous thromboembolism in oncology practice: Use of risk assessment and anticoagulation prophylaxis
title_fullStr Preventing venous thromboembolism in oncology practice: Use of risk assessment and anticoagulation prophylaxis
title_full_unstemmed Preventing venous thromboembolism in oncology practice: Use of risk assessment and anticoagulation prophylaxis
title_short Preventing venous thromboembolism in oncology practice: Use of risk assessment and anticoagulation prophylaxis
title_sort preventing venous thromboembolism in oncology practice: use of risk assessment and anticoagulation prophylaxis
topic Original Articles ‐ Thrombosis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33134786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12431
work_keys_str_mv AT martinkarlyna preventingvenousthromboembolisminoncologypracticeuseofriskassessmentandanticoagulationprophylaxis
AT molsberryrebecca preventingvenousthromboembolisminoncologypracticeuseofriskassessmentandanticoagulationprophylaxis
AT khansadiyas preventingvenousthromboembolisminoncologypracticeuseofriskassessmentandanticoagulationprophylaxis
AT linderjeffreya preventingvenousthromboembolisminoncologypracticeuseofriskassessmentandanticoagulationprophylaxis
AT cameronkenziea preventingvenousthromboembolisminoncologypracticeuseofriskassessmentandanticoagulationprophylaxis
AT bensonal preventingvenousthromboembolisminoncologypracticeuseofriskassessmentandanticoagulationprophylaxis