Cargando…
Preventing venous thromboembolism in oncology practice: Use of risk assessment and anticoagulation prophylaxis
BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Expert consensus recommends a risk‐based approach to guide prophylactic anticoagulation to prevent VTE in ambulatory patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy. However, oncology practice...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33134786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12431 |
_version_ | 1783600765850353664 |
---|---|
author | Martin, Karlyn A. Molsberry, Rebecca Khan, Sadiya S. Linder, Jeffrey A. Cameron, Kenzie A. Benson, Al |
author_facet | Martin, Karlyn A. Molsberry, Rebecca Khan, Sadiya S. Linder, Jeffrey A. Cameron, Kenzie A. Benson, Al |
author_sort | Martin, Karlyn A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Expert consensus recommends a risk‐based approach to guide prophylactic anticoagulation to prevent VTE in ambulatory patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy. However, oncology practice patterns for VTE prevention remain unclear. PATIENTS/METHODS: We conducted (i) a retrospective, single‐center cohort study of patients with pancreatic and gastric cancers to examine rates of prophylactic anticoagulation prescription for eligible patients at high risk of VTE based on the validated Khorana score, and (ii) a 15‐question survey of oncology clinicians at the same institution to assess current practice patterns and knowledge regarding VTE risk assessment and primary thromboprophylaxis in February 2020. RESULTS: Of 437 patients who met study criteria, 181 (41%) had a score of ≥ 3 (high‐risk), and none had an anticoagulation prescription for prophylaxis without an alternate treatment indication. In a survey sent to 98 oncology clinicians, of which 34 participated, 67% were unfamiliar with the Khorana score or guideline recommendations regarding risk‐based VTE prophylaxis, and 90% “never” or “rarely” used VTE risk assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Despite available evidence and existing guideline recommendations for VTE risk assessment for ambulatory patients with cancer, and primary prophylaxis for high‐risk patients, this study demonstrates that there is limited uptake in clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7590270 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75902702020-10-30 Preventing venous thromboembolism in oncology practice: Use of risk assessment and anticoagulation prophylaxis Martin, Karlyn A. Molsberry, Rebecca Khan, Sadiya S. Linder, Jeffrey A. Cameron, Kenzie A. Benson, Al Res Pract Thromb Haemost Original Articles ‐ Thrombosis BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Expert consensus recommends a risk‐based approach to guide prophylactic anticoagulation to prevent VTE in ambulatory patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy. However, oncology practice patterns for VTE prevention remain unclear. PATIENTS/METHODS: We conducted (i) a retrospective, single‐center cohort study of patients with pancreatic and gastric cancers to examine rates of prophylactic anticoagulation prescription for eligible patients at high risk of VTE based on the validated Khorana score, and (ii) a 15‐question survey of oncology clinicians at the same institution to assess current practice patterns and knowledge regarding VTE risk assessment and primary thromboprophylaxis in February 2020. RESULTS: Of 437 patients who met study criteria, 181 (41%) had a score of ≥ 3 (high‐risk), and none had an anticoagulation prescription for prophylaxis without an alternate treatment indication. In a survey sent to 98 oncology clinicians, of which 34 participated, 67% were unfamiliar with the Khorana score or guideline recommendations regarding risk‐based VTE prophylaxis, and 90% “never” or “rarely” used VTE risk assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Despite available evidence and existing guideline recommendations for VTE risk assessment for ambulatory patients with cancer, and primary prophylaxis for high‐risk patients, this study demonstrates that there is limited uptake in clinical practice. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7590270/ /pubmed/33134786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12431 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles ‐ Thrombosis Martin, Karlyn A. Molsberry, Rebecca Khan, Sadiya S. Linder, Jeffrey A. Cameron, Kenzie A. Benson, Al Preventing venous thromboembolism in oncology practice: Use of risk assessment and anticoagulation prophylaxis |
title | Preventing venous thromboembolism in oncology practice: Use of risk assessment and anticoagulation prophylaxis |
title_full | Preventing venous thromboembolism in oncology practice: Use of risk assessment and anticoagulation prophylaxis |
title_fullStr | Preventing venous thromboembolism in oncology practice: Use of risk assessment and anticoagulation prophylaxis |
title_full_unstemmed | Preventing venous thromboembolism in oncology practice: Use of risk assessment and anticoagulation prophylaxis |
title_short | Preventing venous thromboembolism in oncology practice: Use of risk assessment and anticoagulation prophylaxis |
title_sort | preventing venous thromboembolism in oncology practice: use of risk assessment and anticoagulation prophylaxis |
topic | Original Articles ‐ Thrombosis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33134786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12431 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinkarlyna preventingvenousthromboembolisminoncologypracticeuseofriskassessmentandanticoagulationprophylaxis AT molsberryrebecca preventingvenousthromboembolisminoncologypracticeuseofriskassessmentandanticoagulationprophylaxis AT khansadiyas preventingvenousthromboembolisminoncologypracticeuseofriskassessmentandanticoagulationprophylaxis AT linderjeffreya preventingvenousthromboembolisminoncologypracticeuseofriskassessmentandanticoagulationprophylaxis AT cameronkenziea preventingvenousthromboembolisminoncologypracticeuseofriskassessmentandanticoagulationprophylaxis AT bensonal preventingvenousthromboembolisminoncologypracticeuseofriskassessmentandanticoagulationprophylaxis |