Cargando…
A Retrospective Multicenter Study on the Usefulness of 50 g Glucose Challenge Test in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening
INTRODUCTION: To clarify the usefulness of glucose challenge test (GCT), the rate of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) detection and perinatal outcomes were compared between the groups of random blood glucose level (RBG) and 50 g GCT in this study. METHODS: The first survey was conducted at 255 in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Japan Medical Association
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33150244 http://dx.doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2019-0072 |
_version_ | 1783600792733745152 |
---|---|
author | Saito, Miho Hirai, Chihiro Makino, Shintaro Takeda, Jun Nojiri, Shuko Takeda, Satoru Itakura, Atsuo |
author_facet | Saito, Miho Hirai, Chihiro Makino, Shintaro Takeda, Jun Nojiri, Shuko Takeda, Satoru Itakura, Atsuo |
author_sort | Saito, Miho |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: To clarify the usefulness of glucose challenge test (GCT), the rate of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) detection and perinatal outcomes were compared between the groups of random blood glucose level (RBG) and 50 g GCT in this study. METHODS: The first survey was conducted at 255 institutions registered by the Kanto Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology and clinical training institutions in the Kanto Area, followed by a second survey. The included women were broadly classified into the RBG and GCT groups, according to the mid-trimester blood glucose screening method, and the perinatal outcomes of the two groups were retrospectively compared. The primary outcomes were the proportion of infants weighing 3,500 g or more and birth weight ≥90(th)-percentile infants. RESULTS: The rate of GDM diagnosis was significantly higher in the GCT group (7.6%) than that in the RBG group (4.8%). However, no significant differences were observed in perinatal outcomes, i.e., the proportion of infants weighing 3,500 g or more or birth weight ≥90(th) percentile. CONCLUSIONS: GCT is not superior for predicting infants weighing 3,500 g or more and birth weight ≥90(th) percentile, as compared with RBG. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7590393 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Japan Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75903932020-11-03 A Retrospective Multicenter Study on the Usefulness of 50 g Glucose Challenge Test in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening Saito, Miho Hirai, Chihiro Makino, Shintaro Takeda, Jun Nojiri, Shuko Takeda, Satoru Itakura, Atsuo JMA J Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: To clarify the usefulness of glucose challenge test (GCT), the rate of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) detection and perinatal outcomes were compared between the groups of random blood glucose level (RBG) and 50 g GCT in this study. METHODS: The first survey was conducted at 255 institutions registered by the Kanto Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology and clinical training institutions in the Kanto Area, followed by a second survey. The included women were broadly classified into the RBG and GCT groups, according to the mid-trimester blood glucose screening method, and the perinatal outcomes of the two groups were retrospectively compared. The primary outcomes were the proportion of infants weighing 3,500 g or more and birth weight ≥90(th)-percentile infants. RESULTS: The rate of GDM diagnosis was significantly higher in the GCT group (7.6%) than that in the RBG group (4.8%). However, no significant differences were observed in perinatal outcomes, i.e., the proportion of infants weighing 3,500 g or more or birth weight ≥90(th) percentile. CONCLUSIONS: GCT is not superior for predicting infants weighing 3,500 g or more and birth weight ≥90(th) percentile, as compared with RBG. Japan Medical Association 2020-04-06 2020-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7590393/ /pubmed/33150244 http://dx.doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2019-0072 Text en Copyright © Japan Medical Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ JMA Journal is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Saito, Miho Hirai, Chihiro Makino, Shintaro Takeda, Jun Nojiri, Shuko Takeda, Satoru Itakura, Atsuo A Retrospective Multicenter Study on the Usefulness of 50 g Glucose Challenge Test in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening |
title | A Retrospective Multicenter Study on the Usefulness of 50 g Glucose Challenge Test in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening |
title_full | A Retrospective Multicenter Study on the Usefulness of 50 g Glucose Challenge Test in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening |
title_fullStr | A Retrospective Multicenter Study on the Usefulness of 50 g Glucose Challenge Test in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening |
title_full_unstemmed | A Retrospective Multicenter Study on the Usefulness of 50 g Glucose Challenge Test in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening |
title_short | A Retrospective Multicenter Study on the Usefulness of 50 g Glucose Challenge Test in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening |
title_sort | retrospective multicenter study on the usefulness of 50 g glucose challenge test in gestational diabetes mellitus screening |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33150244 http://dx.doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2019-0072 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saitomiho aretrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening AT hiraichihiro aretrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening AT makinoshintaro aretrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening AT takedajun aretrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening AT nojirishuko aretrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening AT takedasatoru aretrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening AT itakuraatsuo aretrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening AT saitomiho retrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening AT hiraichihiro retrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening AT makinoshintaro retrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening AT takedajun retrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening AT nojirishuko retrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening AT takedasatoru retrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening AT itakuraatsuo retrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening |