Cargando…

A Retrospective Multicenter Study on the Usefulness of 50 g Glucose Challenge Test in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening

INTRODUCTION: To clarify the usefulness of glucose challenge test (GCT), the rate of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) detection and perinatal outcomes were compared between the groups of random blood glucose level (RBG) and 50 g GCT in this study. METHODS: The first survey was conducted at 255 in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saito, Miho, Hirai, Chihiro, Makino, Shintaro, Takeda, Jun, Nojiri, Shuko, Takeda, Satoru, Itakura, Atsuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japan Medical Association 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33150244
http://dx.doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2019-0072
_version_ 1783600792733745152
author Saito, Miho
Hirai, Chihiro
Makino, Shintaro
Takeda, Jun
Nojiri, Shuko
Takeda, Satoru
Itakura, Atsuo
author_facet Saito, Miho
Hirai, Chihiro
Makino, Shintaro
Takeda, Jun
Nojiri, Shuko
Takeda, Satoru
Itakura, Atsuo
author_sort Saito, Miho
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To clarify the usefulness of glucose challenge test (GCT), the rate of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) detection and perinatal outcomes were compared between the groups of random blood glucose level (RBG) and 50 g GCT in this study. METHODS: The first survey was conducted at 255 institutions registered by the Kanto Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology and clinical training institutions in the Kanto Area, followed by a second survey. The included women were broadly classified into the RBG and GCT groups, according to the mid-trimester blood glucose screening method, and the perinatal outcomes of the two groups were retrospectively compared. The primary outcomes were the proportion of infants weighing 3,500 g or more and birth weight ≥90(th)-percentile infants. RESULTS: The rate of GDM diagnosis was significantly higher in the GCT group (7.6%) than that in the RBG group (4.8%). However, no significant differences were observed in perinatal outcomes, i.e., the proportion of infants weighing 3,500 g or more or birth weight ≥90(th) percentile. CONCLUSIONS: GCT is not superior for predicting infants weighing 3,500 g or more and birth weight ≥90(th) percentile, as compared with RBG.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7590393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Japan Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75903932020-11-03 A Retrospective Multicenter Study on the Usefulness of 50 g Glucose Challenge Test in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening Saito, Miho Hirai, Chihiro Makino, Shintaro Takeda, Jun Nojiri, Shuko Takeda, Satoru Itakura, Atsuo JMA J Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: To clarify the usefulness of glucose challenge test (GCT), the rate of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) detection and perinatal outcomes were compared between the groups of random blood glucose level (RBG) and 50 g GCT in this study. METHODS: The first survey was conducted at 255 institutions registered by the Kanto Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology and clinical training institutions in the Kanto Area, followed by a second survey. The included women were broadly classified into the RBG and GCT groups, according to the mid-trimester blood glucose screening method, and the perinatal outcomes of the two groups were retrospectively compared. The primary outcomes were the proportion of infants weighing 3,500 g or more and birth weight ≥90(th)-percentile infants. RESULTS: The rate of GDM diagnosis was significantly higher in the GCT group (7.6%) than that in the RBG group (4.8%). However, no significant differences were observed in perinatal outcomes, i.e., the proportion of infants weighing 3,500 g or more or birth weight ≥90(th) percentile. CONCLUSIONS: GCT is not superior for predicting infants weighing 3,500 g or more and birth weight ≥90(th) percentile, as compared with RBG. Japan Medical Association 2020-04-06 2020-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7590393/ /pubmed/33150244 http://dx.doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2019-0072 Text en Copyright © Japan Medical Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ JMA Journal is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Saito, Miho
Hirai, Chihiro
Makino, Shintaro
Takeda, Jun
Nojiri, Shuko
Takeda, Satoru
Itakura, Atsuo
A Retrospective Multicenter Study on the Usefulness of 50 g Glucose Challenge Test in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening
title A Retrospective Multicenter Study on the Usefulness of 50 g Glucose Challenge Test in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening
title_full A Retrospective Multicenter Study on the Usefulness of 50 g Glucose Challenge Test in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening
title_fullStr A Retrospective Multicenter Study on the Usefulness of 50 g Glucose Challenge Test in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening
title_full_unstemmed A Retrospective Multicenter Study on the Usefulness of 50 g Glucose Challenge Test in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening
title_short A Retrospective Multicenter Study on the Usefulness of 50 g Glucose Challenge Test in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening
title_sort retrospective multicenter study on the usefulness of 50 g glucose challenge test in gestational diabetes mellitus screening
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33150244
http://dx.doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2019-0072
work_keys_str_mv AT saitomiho aretrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening
AT hiraichihiro aretrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening
AT makinoshintaro aretrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening
AT takedajun aretrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening
AT nojirishuko aretrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening
AT takedasatoru aretrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening
AT itakuraatsuo aretrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening
AT saitomiho retrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening
AT hiraichihiro retrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening
AT makinoshintaro retrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening
AT takedajun retrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening
AT nojirishuko retrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening
AT takedasatoru retrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening
AT itakuraatsuo retrospectivemulticenterstudyontheusefulnessof50gglucosechallengetestingestationaldiabetesmellitusscreening