Cargando…

Monitoring gestational weight gain and prepregnancy BMI using the 2009 IOM guidelines in the global population: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported a high prevalence of excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) in women with prepregnancy BMI classified as overweight and obese. However, the joint evidence regarding GWG and prepregnancy BMI in the worldwide population has not been synthesized. Thus, this s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martínez-Hortelano, Jose Alberto, Cavero-Redondo, Iván, Álvarez-Bueno, Celia, Garrido-Miguel, Miriam, Soriano-Cano, Alba, Martínez-Vizcaíno, Vicente
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33109112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03335-7
_version_ 1783600811548344320
author Martínez-Hortelano, Jose Alberto
Cavero-Redondo, Iván
Álvarez-Bueno, Celia
Garrido-Miguel, Miriam
Soriano-Cano, Alba
Martínez-Vizcaíno, Vicente
author_facet Martínez-Hortelano, Jose Alberto
Cavero-Redondo, Iván
Álvarez-Bueno, Celia
Garrido-Miguel, Miriam
Soriano-Cano, Alba
Martínez-Vizcaíno, Vicente
author_sort Martínez-Hortelano, Jose Alberto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported a high prevalence of excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) in women with prepregnancy BMI classified as overweight and obese. However, the joint evidence regarding GWG and prepregnancy BMI in the worldwide population has not been synthesized. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate global and regional mean GWG and the prevalence of GWG above, within and below 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines. Second, we aimed to estimate global and regional prepregnancy BMI and the prevalence of BMI categories according to World Health Organization (WHO) classification. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science to identify observational studies until 9 May 2018. We included studies published from 2009 that used 2009 IOM guidelines, reporting data from women in general population with singleton pregnancies. The 2009 IOM categories for GWG and the WHO categories for prepregnancy BMI were used. DerSimonian and Laird random effects methods were used to estimate the pooled and their respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of the mean and by category rates of GWG and prepregnancy BMI, calculated by global and regions. RESULTS: Sixty-three published studies from 29 countries with a total sample size of 1,416,915 women were included. The global prevalence of GWG above and below the 2009 IOM guidelines, was 27.8% (95% CI; 26.5, 29.1) and 39.4% (95% CI; 37.1, 41.7), respectively. Furthermore, meta-regression analyses showed that the mean GWG and the prevalence of GWG above guidelines have increased. The global prevalence of overweight and obesity, was 23.0% (95% CI; 22.3, 23.7) and 16.3% (95% CI; 15.4, 17.4), respectively. The highest mean GWG and prepregnancy BMI were in North America and the lowest were in Asia. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the high prevalence of GWG above the 2009 IOM guidelines and women with overweight/obesity and their continuously increasing trend in most regions, clinicians should recommend lifestyle interventions to improve women’s weight during reproductive age. Due to regional variability, these interventions should be adapted to each cultural context. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018093562). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s12884-020-03335-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7590483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75904832020-10-27 Monitoring gestational weight gain and prepregnancy BMI using the 2009 IOM guidelines in the global population: a systematic review and meta-analysis Martínez-Hortelano, Jose Alberto Cavero-Redondo, Iván Álvarez-Bueno, Celia Garrido-Miguel, Miriam Soriano-Cano, Alba Martínez-Vizcaíno, Vicente BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported a high prevalence of excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) in women with prepregnancy BMI classified as overweight and obese. However, the joint evidence regarding GWG and prepregnancy BMI in the worldwide population has not been synthesized. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate global and regional mean GWG and the prevalence of GWG above, within and below 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines. Second, we aimed to estimate global and regional prepregnancy BMI and the prevalence of BMI categories according to World Health Organization (WHO) classification. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science to identify observational studies until 9 May 2018. We included studies published from 2009 that used 2009 IOM guidelines, reporting data from women in general population with singleton pregnancies. The 2009 IOM categories for GWG and the WHO categories for prepregnancy BMI were used. DerSimonian and Laird random effects methods were used to estimate the pooled and their respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of the mean and by category rates of GWG and prepregnancy BMI, calculated by global and regions. RESULTS: Sixty-three published studies from 29 countries with a total sample size of 1,416,915 women were included. The global prevalence of GWG above and below the 2009 IOM guidelines, was 27.8% (95% CI; 26.5, 29.1) and 39.4% (95% CI; 37.1, 41.7), respectively. Furthermore, meta-regression analyses showed that the mean GWG and the prevalence of GWG above guidelines have increased. The global prevalence of overweight and obesity, was 23.0% (95% CI; 22.3, 23.7) and 16.3% (95% CI; 15.4, 17.4), respectively. The highest mean GWG and prepregnancy BMI were in North America and the lowest were in Asia. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the high prevalence of GWG above the 2009 IOM guidelines and women with overweight/obesity and their continuously increasing trend in most regions, clinicians should recommend lifestyle interventions to improve women’s weight during reproductive age. Due to regional variability, these interventions should be adapted to each cultural context. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018093562). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s12884-020-03335-7. BioMed Central 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7590483/ /pubmed/33109112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03335-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Martínez-Hortelano, Jose Alberto
Cavero-Redondo, Iván
Álvarez-Bueno, Celia
Garrido-Miguel, Miriam
Soriano-Cano, Alba
Martínez-Vizcaíno, Vicente
Monitoring gestational weight gain and prepregnancy BMI using the 2009 IOM guidelines in the global population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Monitoring gestational weight gain and prepregnancy BMI using the 2009 IOM guidelines in the global population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Monitoring gestational weight gain and prepregnancy BMI using the 2009 IOM guidelines in the global population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Monitoring gestational weight gain and prepregnancy BMI using the 2009 IOM guidelines in the global population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring gestational weight gain and prepregnancy BMI using the 2009 IOM guidelines in the global population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Monitoring gestational weight gain and prepregnancy BMI using the 2009 IOM guidelines in the global population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort monitoring gestational weight gain and prepregnancy bmi using the 2009 iom guidelines in the global population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33109112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03335-7
work_keys_str_mv AT martinezhortelanojosealberto monitoringgestationalweightgainandprepregnancybmiusingthe2009iomguidelinesintheglobalpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT caveroredondoivan monitoringgestationalweightgainandprepregnancybmiusingthe2009iomguidelinesintheglobalpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alvarezbuenocelia monitoringgestationalweightgainandprepregnancybmiusingthe2009iomguidelinesintheglobalpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT garridomiguelmiriam monitoringgestationalweightgainandprepregnancybmiusingthe2009iomguidelinesintheglobalpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sorianocanoalba monitoringgestationalweightgainandprepregnancybmiusingthe2009iomguidelinesintheglobalpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT martinezvizcainovicente monitoringgestationalweightgainandprepregnancybmiusingthe2009iomguidelinesintheglobalpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis