Cargando…

Comparative ligand structural analytics illustrated on variably glycosylated MUC1 antigen–antibody binding

When faced with the investigation of the preferential binding of a series of ligands against a known target, the solution is not always evident from single structure analysis. An ensemble of structures generated from computer simulations is valuable; however, visual analysis of the extensive structu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barnett, Christopher B, Senapathi, Tharindu, Naidoo, Kevin J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Beilstein-Institut 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33133286
http://dx.doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.16.206
_version_ 1783600839098630144
author Barnett, Christopher B
Senapathi, Tharindu
Naidoo, Kevin J
author_facet Barnett, Christopher B
Senapathi, Tharindu
Naidoo, Kevin J
author_sort Barnett, Christopher B
collection PubMed
description When faced with the investigation of the preferential binding of a series of ligands against a known target, the solution is not always evident from single structure analysis. An ensemble of structures generated from computer simulations is valuable; however, visual analysis of the extensive structural data can be overwhelming. Rapid analysis of trajectory data, with tools available in the Galaxy platform, can be used to understand key features and compare differences that inform the preferential ligand structure that favors binding. We illustrate this informatics approach by investigating the in-silico binding of a peptide and glycopeptide epitope of the glycoprotein Mucin 1 (MUC1) binding with the antibody AR20.5. To study the binding, we performed molecular dynamics simulations using OpenMM and then used the Galaxy platform for data analysis. The same analysis tools are applied to each of the simulation trajectories and this process was streamlined by using Galaxy workflows. The conformations of the antigens were analyzed using root-mean-square deviation, end-to-end distance, Ramachandran plots, and hydrogen bonding analysis. Additionally, RMSF and clustering analysis were carried out. These analyses were used to rapidly assess key features of the system, interrogate the dynamic structure of the ligand, and determine the role of glycosylation on the conformational equilibrium. The glycopeptide conformations in solution change relative to the peptide; thus a partially pre-structuring is seen prior to binding. Although the bound conformation of peptide and glycopeptide is similar, the glycopeptide fluctuates less and resides in specific conformers for more extended periods. This structural analysis which gives a high-level view of the features in the system under observation, could be readily applied to other binding problems as part of a general strategy in drug design or mechanistic analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7590620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Beilstein-Institut
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75906202020-10-30 Comparative ligand structural analytics illustrated on variably glycosylated MUC1 antigen–antibody binding Barnett, Christopher B Senapathi, Tharindu Naidoo, Kevin J Beilstein J Org Chem Full Research Paper When faced with the investigation of the preferential binding of a series of ligands against a known target, the solution is not always evident from single structure analysis. An ensemble of structures generated from computer simulations is valuable; however, visual analysis of the extensive structural data can be overwhelming. Rapid analysis of trajectory data, with tools available in the Galaxy platform, can be used to understand key features and compare differences that inform the preferential ligand structure that favors binding. We illustrate this informatics approach by investigating the in-silico binding of a peptide and glycopeptide epitope of the glycoprotein Mucin 1 (MUC1) binding with the antibody AR20.5. To study the binding, we performed molecular dynamics simulations using OpenMM and then used the Galaxy platform for data analysis. The same analysis tools are applied to each of the simulation trajectories and this process was streamlined by using Galaxy workflows. The conformations of the antigens were analyzed using root-mean-square deviation, end-to-end distance, Ramachandran plots, and hydrogen bonding analysis. Additionally, RMSF and clustering analysis were carried out. These analyses were used to rapidly assess key features of the system, interrogate the dynamic structure of the ligand, and determine the role of glycosylation on the conformational equilibrium. The glycopeptide conformations in solution change relative to the peptide; thus a partially pre-structuring is seen prior to binding. Although the bound conformation of peptide and glycopeptide is similar, the glycopeptide fluctuates less and resides in specific conformers for more extended periods. This structural analysis which gives a high-level view of the features in the system under observation, could be readily applied to other binding problems as part of a general strategy in drug design or mechanistic analysis. Beilstein-Institut 2020-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7590620/ /pubmed/33133286 http://dx.doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.16.206 Text en Copyright © 2020, Barnett et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc/termsThis is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). Please note that the reuse, redistribution and reproduction in particular requires that the authors and source are credited. The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc/terms)
spellingShingle Full Research Paper
Barnett, Christopher B
Senapathi, Tharindu
Naidoo, Kevin J
Comparative ligand structural analytics illustrated on variably glycosylated MUC1 antigen–antibody binding
title Comparative ligand structural analytics illustrated on variably glycosylated MUC1 antigen–antibody binding
title_full Comparative ligand structural analytics illustrated on variably glycosylated MUC1 antigen–antibody binding
title_fullStr Comparative ligand structural analytics illustrated on variably glycosylated MUC1 antigen–antibody binding
title_full_unstemmed Comparative ligand structural analytics illustrated on variably glycosylated MUC1 antigen–antibody binding
title_short Comparative ligand structural analytics illustrated on variably glycosylated MUC1 antigen–antibody binding
title_sort comparative ligand structural analytics illustrated on variably glycosylated muc1 antigen–antibody binding
topic Full Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33133286
http://dx.doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.16.206
work_keys_str_mv AT barnettchristopherb comparativeligandstructuralanalyticsillustratedonvariablyglycosylatedmuc1antigenantibodybinding
AT senapathitharindu comparativeligandstructuralanalyticsillustratedonvariablyglycosylatedmuc1antigenantibodybinding
AT naidookevinj comparativeligandstructuralanalyticsillustratedonvariablyglycosylatedmuc1antigenantibodybinding