Cargando…

Intravascular Endothelin-1 does not trigger or increase susceptibility to Spreading Depolarizations

OBJECTIVES: Spreading depolarizations (SD) likely manifest as aura in migraineurs. Triggers are unknown although vascular events have been implicated. Direct carotid puncture has been reported to trigger migraine with aura. The potent vasoconstrictor endothelin-1 (ET-1), which can be released from t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sugimoto, Kazutaka, Morais, Andreia, Sadeghian, Homa, Qin, Tao, Chung, David Y., Ashina, Messoud, Hougaard, Anders, Ayata, Cenk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33109086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01194-3
_version_ 1783600847837462528
author Sugimoto, Kazutaka
Morais, Andreia
Sadeghian, Homa
Qin, Tao
Chung, David Y.
Ashina, Messoud
Hougaard, Anders
Ayata, Cenk
author_facet Sugimoto, Kazutaka
Morais, Andreia
Sadeghian, Homa
Qin, Tao
Chung, David Y.
Ashina, Messoud
Hougaard, Anders
Ayata, Cenk
author_sort Sugimoto, Kazutaka
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Spreading depolarizations (SD) likely manifest as aura in migraineurs. Triggers are unknown although vascular events have been implicated. Direct carotid puncture has been reported to trigger migraine with aura. The potent vasoconstrictor endothelin-1 (ET-1), which can be released from the endothelium under pathological conditions, may play a role. Here, we tested whether intracarotid ET-1 infusion triggers SD and whether systemic ET-1 infusion increases the susceptibility to SD. METHODS: Carotid infusions were performed in mice (C57BL/6, male) through a catheter placed at the carotid bifurcation via the external carotid artery. Intracarotid ET-1 (1.25 nmol/ml) was infused at various rates (2–16 μl/min) with or without heparin in the catheter and compared with vehicle infusion (PBS with 0.01% acetic acid) or sham-operated mice (n = 5). Systemic infusions ET-1 (1 nmol/kg, n = 7) or vehicle (n = 7) infusions were performed in rats (Sprague-Dawley, male) via the tail vein. Electrical SD threshold and KCl-induced SD frequency were measured after the infusion. RESULTS: Intracarotid infusion of saline (n = 19), vehicle (n = 7) or ET-1 (n = 12) all triggered SDs at various proportions (21%, 14% and 50%, respectively). These were often associated with severe hypoperfusion prior to SD onset. Heparinizing the infusion catheter completely prevented SD occurrence during the infusions (n = 8), implicating microembolization from carotid thrombi as the trigger. Sham-operated mice never developed SD. Systemic infusion of ET-1 did not affect the electrical SD threshold or KCl-induced SD frequency. CONCLUSION: Intravascular ET-1 does not trigger or increase susceptibility to SD. Microembolization was the likely trigger for migraine auras in patients during carotid puncture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7590662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75906622020-10-27 Intravascular Endothelin-1 does not trigger or increase susceptibility to Spreading Depolarizations Sugimoto, Kazutaka Morais, Andreia Sadeghian, Homa Qin, Tao Chung, David Y. Ashina, Messoud Hougaard, Anders Ayata, Cenk J Headache Pain Research Article OBJECTIVES: Spreading depolarizations (SD) likely manifest as aura in migraineurs. Triggers are unknown although vascular events have been implicated. Direct carotid puncture has been reported to trigger migraine with aura. The potent vasoconstrictor endothelin-1 (ET-1), which can be released from the endothelium under pathological conditions, may play a role. Here, we tested whether intracarotid ET-1 infusion triggers SD and whether systemic ET-1 infusion increases the susceptibility to SD. METHODS: Carotid infusions were performed in mice (C57BL/6, male) through a catheter placed at the carotid bifurcation via the external carotid artery. Intracarotid ET-1 (1.25 nmol/ml) was infused at various rates (2–16 μl/min) with or without heparin in the catheter and compared with vehicle infusion (PBS with 0.01% acetic acid) or sham-operated mice (n = 5). Systemic infusions ET-1 (1 nmol/kg, n = 7) or vehicle (n = 7) infusions were performed in rats (Sprague-Dawley, male) via the tail vein. Electrical SD threshold and KCl-induced SD frequency were measured after the infusion. RESULTS: Intracarotid infusion of saline (n = 19), vehicle (n = 7) or ET-1 (n = 12) all triggered SDs at various proportions (21%, 14% and 50%, respectively). These were often associated with severe hypoperfusion prior to SD onset. Heparinizing the infusion catheter completely prevented SD occurrence during the infusions (n = 8), implicating microembolization from carotid thrombi as the trigger. Sham-operated mice never developed SD. Systemic infusion of ET-1 did not affect the electrical SD threshold or KCl-induced SD frequency. CONCLUSION: Intravascular ET-1 does not trigger or increase susceptibility to SD. Microembolization was the likely trigger for migraine auras in patients during carotid puncture. Springer Milan 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7590662/ /pubmed/33109086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01194-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sugimoto, Kazutaka
Morais, Andreia
Sadeghian, Homa
Qin, Tao
Chung, David Y.
Ashina, Messoud
Hougaard, Anders
Ayata, Cenk
Intravascular Endothelin-1 does not trigger or increase susceptibility to Spreading Depolarizations
title Intravascular Endothelin-1 does not trigger or increase susceptibility to Spreading Depolarizations
title_full Intravascular Endothelin-1 does not trigger or increase susceptibility to Spreading Depolarizations
title_fullStr Intravascular Endothelin-1 does not trigger or increase susceptibility to Spreading Depolarizations
title_full_unstemmed Intravascular Endothelin-1 does not trigger or increase susceptibility to Spreading Depolarizations
title_short Intravascular Endothelin-1 does not trigger or increase susceptibility to Spreading Depolarizations
title_sort intravascular endothelin-1 does not trigger or increase susceptibility to spreading depolarizations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33109086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01194-3
work_keys_str_mv AT sugimotokazutaka intravascularendothelin1doesnottriggerorincreasesusceptibilitytospreadingdepolarizations
AT moraisandreia intravascularendothelin1doesnottriggerorincreasesusceptibilitytospreadingdepolarizations
AT sadeghianhoma intravascularendothelin1doesnottriggerorincreasesusceptibilitytospreadingdepolarizations
AT qintao intravascularendothelin1doesnottriggerorincreasesusceptibilitytospreadingdepolarizations
AT chungdavidy intravascularendothelin1doesnottriggerorincreasesusceptibilitytospreadingdepolarizations
AT ashinamessoud intravascularendothelin1doesnottriggerorincreasesusceptibilitytospreadingdepolarizations
AT hougaardanders intravascularendothelin1doesnottriggerorincreasesusceptibilitytospreadingdepolarizations
AT ayatacenk intravascularendothelin1doesnottriggerorincreasesusceptibilitytospreadingdepolarizations