Cargando…

An ethical issue: nurses’ conscientious objection regarding induced abortion in South Korea

BACKGROUND: The Constitutional Court of South Korea declared that an abortion ban was unconstitutional on April 11, 2019. The National Health Care System will provide abortion care across the country as a formal medical service. Conscientious objection is an issue raised during the construction of l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ko, Chung Mee, Koh, Chin Kang, Lee, Ye Sol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33109174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00552-9
_version_ 1783600858930348032
author Ko, Chung Mee
Koh, Chin Kang
Lee, Ye Sol
author_facet Ko, Chung Mee
Koh, Chin Kang
Lee, Ye Sol
author_sort Ko, Chung Mee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Constitutional Court of South Korea declared that an abortion ban was unconstitutional on April 11, 2019. The National Health Care System will provide abortion care across the country as a formal medical service. Conscientious objection is an issue raised during the construction of legal reforms. METHODS: One hundred sixty-seven perioperative nurses responded to the survey questionnaire. Nurses’ perception about conscientious objection, support of legislation regarding conscientious objection, and intention to object were measured. Logistic regression was used to explore the factors associated with support of the legislation and the intention to conscientiously object. RESULTS: Only 28.8% of the responding nurses were aware of health care professionals’ conscientious objection. The majority (68.7%) felt that patients’ rights should be prioritized over health care professionals’ conscientious objection. On the other hand, 45.8% supported the legislation on conscientious objection to abortion, and 42.5% indicated a willingness to refuse to participate in an abortion case if conscientious objection was permitted. Religion, awareness of conscientious objection, and prioritizing of nurses’ right to conscientious objection were significantly associated with supporting the legislation. Moreover, religion and prioritizing nurses' rights were significantly associated with the intention to conscientiously object. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides information necessary for further discussion of nurses’ conscientious objection. Nursing leaders, researchers, and educators should appeal to nurses and involve them in making policies that balance a women's right to non-discrimination and to receiving appropriate care with nurses' rights to maintain their moral integrity without compromising their professional obligation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7590714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75907142020-10-27 An ethical issue: nurses’ conscientious objection regarding induced abortion in South Korea Ko, Chung Mee Koh, Chin Kang Lee, Ye Sol BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: The Constitutional Court of South Korea declared that an abortion ban was unconstitutional on April 11, 2019. The National Health Care System will provide abortion care across the country as a formal medical service. Conscientious objection is an issue raised during the construction of legal reforms. METHODS: One hundred sixty-seven perioperative nurses responded to the survey questionnaire. Nurses’ perception about conscientious objection, support of legislation regarding conscientious objection, and intention to object were measured. Logistic regression was used to explore the factors associated with support of the legislation and the intention to conscientiously object. RESULTS: Only 28.8% of the responding nurses were aware of health care professionals’ conscientious objection. The majority (68.7%) felt that patients’ rights should be prioritized over health care professionals’ conscientious objection. On the other hand, 45.8% supported the legislation on conscientious objection to abortion, and 42.5% indicated a willingness to refuse to participate in an abortion case if conscientious objection was permitted. Religion, awareness of conscientious objection, and prioritizing of nurses’ right to conscientious objection were significantly associated with supporting the legislation. Moreover, religion and prioritizing nurses' rights were significantly associated with the intention to conscientiously object. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides information necessary for further discussion of nurses’ conscientious objection. Nursing leaders, researchers, and educators should appeal to nurses and involve them in making policies that balance a women's right to non-discrimination and to receiving appropriate care with nurses' rights to maintain their moral integrity without compromising their professional obligation. BioMed Central 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7590714/ /pubmed/33109174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00552-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ko, Chung Mee
Koh, Chin Kang
Lee, Ye Sol
An ethical issue: nurses’ conscientious objection regarding induced abortion in South Korea
title An ethical issue: nurses’ conscientious objection regarding induced abortion in South Korea
title_full An ethical issue: nurses’ conscientious objection regarding induced abortion in South Korea
title_fullStr An ethical issue: nurses’ conscientious objection regarding induced abortion in South Korea
title_full_unstemmed An ethical issue: nurses’ conscientious objection regarding induced abortion in South Korea
title_short An ethical issue: nurses’ conscientious objection regarding induced abortion in South Korea
title_sort ethical issue: nurses’ conscientious objection regarding induced abortion in south korea
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33109174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00552-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kochungmee anethicalissuenursesconscientiousobjectionregardinginducedabortioninsouthkorea
AT kohchinkang anethicalissuenursesconscientiousobjectionregardinginducedabortioninsouthkorea
AT leeyesol anethicalissuenursesconscientiousobjectionregardinginducedabortioninsouthkorea
AT kochungmee ethicalissuenursesconscientiousobjectionregardinginducedabortioninsouthkorea
AT kohchinkang ethicalissuenursesconscientiousobjectionregardinginducedabortioninsouthkorea
AT leeyesol ethicalissuenursesconscientiousobjectionregardinginducedabortioninsouthkorea