Cargando…

Vitamin D(3) metabolite ratio as an indicator of vitamin D status and its association with diabetes complications

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D deficiency is diagnosed by total serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration and is associated with poor health and increased mortality; however, some populations have low 25(OH) D concentrations without manifestations of vitamin D deficiency. The Vitamin D Metabolite Rat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmed, Lina H. M., Butler, Alexandra E., Dargham, Soha R., Latif, Aishah, Chidiac, Omar M., Atkin, Stephen L., Abi Khalil, Charbel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33109163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-020-00641-1
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Vitamin D deficiency is diagnosed by total serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration and is associated with poor health and increased mortality; however, some populations have low 25(OH) D concentrations without manifestations of vitamin D deficiency. The Vitamin D Metabolite Ratio (VMR) has been suggested as a superior indicator of vitamin D status. Therefore, VMR was determined in a population with type 2 diabetes at high risk for vitamin D deficiency and correlated with diabetic complications. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Four hundred sisty patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) were recruited, all were vitamin D(3) supplement naive. Plasma concentration of 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3) (25(OH)D(3)) and its metabolites 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) (1,25(OH)(2)D(3)) and 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) (24,25(OH)(2)D(3)) and its epimer, 3-epi-25-hydroxyvitamin D(3) (3-epi-25(OH)D(3)), were measured by LC-MS/MS analysis. VMR-1 was calculated as a ratio of 24,25(OH)(2)D(3):25(OH)D(3); VMR-2 as a ratio of 1,25(OH)(2)D(3):25(OH)D(3); VMR-3 was calculated as a ratio of 3-epi-25(OH)D(3): 25(OH)D(3.) RESULTS: An association means that there were significant differences between the ratios found for those with versus those without the various diabetic complications studied. VMR-1 was associated with diabetic retinopathy (p = 0.001) and peripheral artery disease (p = 0.012); VMR-2 associated with hypertension (p < 0.001), dyslipidemia (p < 0.001), diabetic retinopathy (p < 0.001), diabetic neuropathy (p < 0.001), coronary artery disease (p = 0.001) and stroke (p < 0.05). VMR-3 associated with hypertension (p < 0.05), dyslipidemia (p < 0.001) and coronary artery disease (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this cross sectional study, whilst not causal, VMR-2 was shown to be the superior predictor of diabetic and cardiovascular complications though not demonstrative of causality in this cross-sectional study population over VMR-1, VMR-3 and the individual vitamin D concentration measurements; VMR-2 associated with both microvascular and cardiovascular indices and therefore may have utility in predicting the development of diabetic complications. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s12902-020-00641-1.