Cargando…

Sex differences in fatigability after ischemic preconditioning of non-exercising limbs

BACKGROUND: Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) is suggested to decrease fatigability in some individuals but not others. Sex differences in response to IPC may account for this variability and few studies systematically investigated the effects of IPC in men and women. The goal of this study was to dete...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pereira, Hugo M., de Lima, Felipe F., Silva, Bruno M., Kohn, André F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33109241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-020-00338-z
_version_ 1783600869317541888
author Pereira, Hugo M.
de Lima, Felipe F.
Silva, Bruno M.
Kohn, André F.
author_facet Pereira, Hugo M.
de Lima, Felipe F.
Silva, Bruno M.
Kohn, André F.
author_sort Pereira, Hugo M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) is suggested to decrease fatigability in some individuals but not others. Sex differences in response to IPC may account for this variability and few studies systematically investigated the effects of IPC in men and women. The goal of this study was to determine if time to task failure, perception of pain, and neuromuscular mechanisms of fatigability were altered by IPC in men and women. METHODS: Ten women (29 ± 5 years old) and 10 men (28 ± 6 years old) performed isometric contractions with the plantar flexor muscles of the dominant leg at 20% of maximal voluntary contraction until task failure. We used a repeated measures design where each individual performed 3 randomized and counterbalanced test sessions: (A) IPC session, cuff inflation and deflation (5 min each repeated 3 times) performed before the exercise by inflating cuffs to the non-dominant leg and arm; (B) sham session, cuffs were inflated for a short period (1 min); and (C) control session, no cuffs were involved. RESULTS: Compared with control, IPC increased time to task failure in men (mean difference, 5 min; confidence interval (CI) of mean difference, 2.2; 7.8 min; P = 0.01) but not women (mean difference, − 0.6 min; CI of mean difference, − 3.5; 2.4 min; P = 0.51). In men, but not women, the IPC-induced increase in time to task failure was associated with lower response to pressure pain (r = − 0.79). IPC further exposed sex differences in arterial pressure during fatiguing contractions (session × sex: P < 0.05). Voluntary activation, estimated with the twitch interpolation technique, and presynaptic inhibition of leg Ia afferents were not altered after IPC for men and women. The tested variables were not altered with sham. CONCLUSIONS: The ergogenic effect of IPC on time to task failure was observed only in men and it was associated with reductions in the perception of pain. This pilot data suggest the previously reported inter-individual variability in exercise-induced fatigability after IPC could be a consequence of the sex and individual response to pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7590792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75907922020-10-27 Sex differences in fatigability after ischemic preconditioning of non-exercising limbs Pereira, Hugo M. de Lima, Felipe F. Silva, Bruno M. Kohn, André F. Biol Sex Differ Research BACKGROUND: Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) is suggested to decrease fatigability in some individuals but not others. Sex differences in response to IPC may account for this variability and few studies systematically investigated the effects of IPC in men and women. The goal of this study was to determine if time to task failure, perception of pain, and neuromuscular mechanisms of fatigability were altered by IPC in men and women. METHODS: Ten women (29 ± 5 years old) and 10 men (28 ± 6 years old) performed isometric contractions with the plantar flexor muscles of the dominant leg at 20% of maximal voluntary contraction until task failure. We used a repeated measures design where each individual performed 3 randomized and counterbalanced test sessions: (A) IPC session, cuff inflation and deflation (5 min each repeated 3 times) performed before the exercise by inflating cuffs to the non-dominant leg and arm; (B) sham session, cuffs were inflated for a short period (1 min); and (C) control session, no cuffs were involved. RESULTS: Compared with control, IPC increased time to task failure in men (mean difference, 5 min; confidence interval (CI) of mean difference, 2.2; 7.8 min; P = 0.01) but not women (mean difference, − 0.6 min; CI of mean difference, − 3.5; 2.4 min; P = 0.51). In men, but not women, the IPC-induced increase in time to task failure was associated with lower response to pressure pain (r = − 0.79). IPC further exposed sex differences in arterial pressure during fatiguing contractions (session × sex: P < 0.05). Voluntary activation, estimated with the twitch interpolation technique, and presynaptic inhibition of leg Ia afferents were not altered after IPC for men and women. The tested variables were not altered with sham. CONCLUSIONS: The ergogenic effect of IPC on time to task failure was observed only in men and it was associated with reductions in the perception of pain. This pilot data suggest the previously reported inter-individual variability in exercise-induced fatigability after IPC could be a consequence of the sex and individual response to pain. BioMed Central 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7590792/ /pubmed/33109241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-020-00338-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Pereira, Hugo M.
de Lima, Felipe F.
Silva, Bruno M.
Kohn, André F.
Sex differences in fatigability after ischemic preconditioning of non-exercising limbs
title Sex differences in fatigability after ischemic preconditioning of non-exercising limbs
title_full Sex differences in fatigability after ischemic preconditioning of non-exercising limbs
title_fullStr Sex differences in fatigability after ischemic preconditioning of non-exercising limbs
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in fatigability after ischemic preconditioning of non-exercising limbs
title_short Sex differences in fatigability after ischemic preconditioning of non-exercising limbs
title_sort sex differences in fatigability after ischemic preconditioning of non-exercising limbs
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33109241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-020-00338-z
work_keys_str_mv AT pereirahugom sexdifferencesinfatigabilityafterischemicpreconditioningofnonexercisinglimbs
AT delimafelipef sexdifferencesinfatigabilityafterischemicpreconditioningofnonexercisinglimbs
AT silvabrunom sexdifferencesinfatigabilityafterischemicpreconditioningofnonexercisinglimbs
AT kohnandref sexdifferencesinfatigabilityafterischemicpreconditioningofnonexercisinglimbs