Cargando…
Differences in intrinsic aerobic capacity alters sensitivity to ischemia-reperfusion injury but not cardioprotective capacity by ischemic preconditioning in rats
INTRODUCTION: Aerobic capacity is a strong predictor of cardiovascular mortality. Whether aerobic capacity influences myocardial ischemia and reperfusion (IR) injury is unknown. PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of intrinsic differences in aerobic capacity and the cardioprotective potential on IR i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7591019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33108389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240866 |
_version_ | 1783600909198032896 |
---|---|
author | Hjortbak, Marie Vognstoft Grønnebæk, Thomas Skjærlund Jespersen, Nichlas Riise Lassen, Thomas Ravn Seefeldt, Jacob Marthinsen Tonnesen, Pernille Tilma Jensen, Rebekka Vibjerg Koch, Lauren Gerard Britton, Steven L. Pedersen, Michael Jessen, Niels Bøtker, Hans Erik |
author_facet | Hjortbak, Marie Vognstoft Grønnebæk, Thomas Skjærlund Jespersen, Nichlas Riise Lassen, Thomas Ravn Seefeldt, Jacob Marthinsen Tonnesen, Pernille Tilma Jensen, Rebekka Vibjerg Koch, Lauren Gerard Britton, Steven L. Pedersen, Michael Jessen, Niels Bøtker, Hans Erik |
author_sort | Hjortbak, Marie Vognstoft |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Aerobic capacity is a strong predictor of cardiovascular mortality. Whether aerobic capacity influences myocardial ischemia and reperfusion (IR) injury is unknown. PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of intrinsic differences in aerobic capacity and the cardioprotective potential on IR injury. METHODS: We studied hearts from rats developed by selective breeding for high (HCR) or low (LCR) capacity for treadmill running. The rats were randomized to: (1) control, (2) local ischemic preconditioning (IPC) or (3) remote ischemic preconditioning (RIC) followed by 30 minutes of ischemia and 120 minutes of reperfusion in an isolated perfused heart model. The primary endpoint was infarct size. Secondary endpoints included uptake of labelled glucose, content of selected mitochondrial proteins in skeletal and cardiac muscle, and activation of AMP-activated kinase (AMPK). RESULTS: At baseline, running distance was 203±7 m in LCR vs 1905±51 m in HCR rats (p<0.01). Infarct size was significantly lower in LCR than in HCR controls (49±5% vs 68±5%, p = 0.04). IPC reduced infarct size by 47% in LCR (p<0.01) and by 31% in HCR rats (p = 0.01). RIC did not modulate infarct size (LCR: 52±5, p>0.99; HCR: 69±6%, p>0.99, respectively). Phosphorylaion of AMPK did not differ between LCR and HCR controls. IPC did not modulate cardiac phosphorylation of AMPK. Glucose uptake during reperfusion was similar in LCR and HCR rats. IPC increased glucose uptake during reperfusion in LCR animals (p = 0.02). Mitochondrial protein content in skeletal muscle was lower in LCR than in HCR (0.77±0.10 arbitrary units (AU) vs 1.09±0.07 AU, p = 0.02), but not in cardiac muscle. CONCLUSION: Aerobic capacity is associated with altered myocardial sensitivity to IR injury, but the cardioprotective effect of IPC is not. Glucose uptake, AMPK activation immediately prior to ischemia and basal mitochondrial protein content in the heart seem to be of minor importance as underlying mechanisms for the cardioprotective effects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7591019 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75910192020-10-30 Differences in intrinsic aerobic capacity alters sensitivity to ischemia-reperfusion injury but not cardioprotective capacity by ischemic preconditioning in rats Hjortbak, Marie Vognstoft Grønnebæk, Thomas Skjærlund Jespersen, Nichlas Riise Lassen, Thomas Ravn Seefeldt, Jacob Marthinsen Tonnesen, Pernille Tilma Jensen, Rebekka Vibjerg Koch, Lauren Gerard Britton, Steven L. Pedersen, Michael Jessen, Niels Bøtker, Hans Erik PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Aerobic capacity is a strong predictor of cardiovascular mortality. Whether aerobic capacity influences myocardial ischemia and reperfusion (IR) injury is unknown. PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of intrinsic differences in aerobic capacity and the cardioprotective potential on IR injury. METHODS: We studied hearts from rats developed by selective breeding for high (HCR) or low (LCR) capacity for treadmill running. The rats were randomized to: (1) control, (2) local ischemic preconditioning (IPC) or (3) remote ischemic preconditioning (RIC) followed by 30 minutes of ischemia and 120 minutes of reperfusion in an isolated perfused heart model. The primary endpoint was infarct size. Secondary endpoints included uptake of labelled glucose, content of selected mitochondrial proteins in skeletal and cardiac muscle, and activation of AMP-activated kinase (AMPK). RESULTS: At baseline, running distance was 203±7 m in LCR vs 1905±51 m in HCR rats (p<0.01). Infarct size was significantly lower in LCR than in HCR controls (49±5% vs 68±5%, p = 0.04). IPC reduced infarct size by 47% in LCR (p<0.01) and by 31% in HCR rats (p = 0.01). RIC did not modulate infarct size (LCR: 52±5, p>0.99; HCR: 69±6%, p>0.99, respectively). Phosphorylaion of AMPK did not differ between LCR and HCR controls. IPC did not modulate cardiac phosphorylation of AMPK. Glucose uptake during reperfusion was similar in LCR and HCR rats. IPC increased glucose uptake during reperfusion in LCR animals (p = 0.02). Mitochondrial protein content in skeletal muscle was lower in LCR than in HCR (0.77±0.10 arbitrary units (AU) vs 1.09±0.07 AU, p = 0.02), but not in cardiac muscle. CONCLUSION: Aerobic capacity is associated with altered myocardial sensitivity to IR injury, but the cardioprotective effect of IPC is not. Glucose uptake, AMPK activation immediately prior to ischemia and basal mitochondrial protein content in the heart seem to be of minor importance as underlying mechanisms for the cardioprotective effects. Public Library of Science 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7591019/ /pubmed/33108389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240866 Text en © 2020 Hjortbak et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hjortbak, Marie Vognstoft Grønnebæk, Thomas Skjærlund Jespersen, Nichlas Riise Lassen, Thomas Ravn Seefeldt, Jacob Marthinsen Tonnesen, Pernille Tilma Jensen, Rebekka Vibjerg Koch, Lauren Gerard Britton, Steven L. Pedersen, Michael Jessen, Niels Bøtker, Hans Erik Differences in intrinsic aerobic capacity alters sensitivity to ischemia-reperfusion injury but not cardioprotective capacity by ischemic preconditioning in rats |
title | Differences in intrinsic aerobic capacity alters sensitivity to ischemia-reperfusion injury but not cardioprotective capacity by ischemic preconditioning in rats |
title_full | Differences in intrinsic aerobic capacity alters sensitivity to ischemia-reperfusion injury but not cardioprotective capacity by ischemic preconditioning in rats |
title_fullStr | Differences in intrinsic aerobic capacity alters sensitivity to ischemia-reperfusion injury but not cardioprotective capacity by ischemic preconditioning in rats |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in intrinsic aerobic capacity alters sensitivity to ischemia-reperfusion injury but not cardioprotective capacity by ischemic preconditioning in rats |
title_short | Differences in intrinsic aerobic capacity alters sensitivity to ischemia-reperfusion injury but not cardioprotective capacity by ischemic preconditioning in rats |
title_sort | differences in intrinsic aerobic capacity alters sensitivity to ischemia-reperfusion injury but not cardioprotective capacity by ischemic preconditioning in rats |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7591019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33108389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240866 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hjortbakmarievognstoft differencesinintrinsicaerobiccapacityalterssensitivitytoischemiareperfusioninjurybutnotcardioprotectivecapacitybyischemicpreconditioninginrats AT grønnebækthomasskjærlund differencesinintrinsicaerobiccapacityalterssensitivitytoischemiareperfusioninjurybutnotcardioprotectivecapacitybyischemicpreconditioninginrats AT jespersennichlasriise differencesinintrinsicaerobiccapacityalterssensitivitytoischemiareperfusioninjurybutnotcardioprotectivecapacitybyischemicpreconditioninginrats AT lassenthomasravn differencesinintrinsicaerobiccapacityalterssensitivitytoischemiareperfusioninjurybutnotcardioprotectivecapacitybyischemicpreconditioninginrats AT seefeldtjacobmarthinsen differencesinintrinsicaerobiccapacityalterssensitivitytoischemiareperfusioninjurybutnotcardioprotectivecapacitybyischemicpreconditioninginrats AT tonnesenpernilletilma differencesinintrinsicaerobiccapacityalterssensitivitytoischemiareperfusioninjurybutnotcardioprotectivecapacitybyischemicpreconditioninginrats AT jensenrebekkavibjerg differencesinintrinsicaerobiccapacityalterssensitivitytoischemiareperfusioninjurybutnotcardioprotectivecapacitybyischemicpreconditioninginrats AT kochlaurengerard differencesinintrinsicaerobiccapacityalterssensitivitytoischemiareperfusioninjurybutnotcardioprotectivecapacitybyischemicpreconditioninginrats AT brittonstevenl differencesinintrinsicaerobiccapacityalterssensitivitytoischemiareperfusioninjurybutnotcardioprotectivecapacitybyischemicpreconditioninginrats AT pedersenmichael differencesinintrinsicaerobiccapacityalterssensitivitytoischemiareperfusioninjurybutnotcardioprotectivecapacitybyischemicpreconditioninginrats AT jessenniels differencesinintrinsicaerobiccapacityalterssensitivitytoischemiareperfusioninjurybutnotcardioprotectivecapacitybyischemicpreconditioninginrats AT bøtkerhanserik differencesinintrinsicaerobiccapacityalterssensitivitytoischemiareperfusioninjurybutnotcardioprotectivecapacitybyischemicpreconditioninginrats |