Cargando…
Interfascial Plane Blocks and Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery: A Narrative Review
Laparoscopic abdominal surgery has become a mainstay of modern surgical practice. Postoperative analgesia is an integral component of recovery following laparoscopic abdominal surgery and may be improved by regional anesthesia or intravenous lidocaine infusion. There is inconsistent evidence support...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7591028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33122942 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S272694 |
_version_ | 1783600911277359104 |
---|---|
author | Jones, James Harvey Aldwinckle, Robin |
author_facet | Jones, James Harvey Aldwinckle, Robin |
author_sort | Jones, James Harvey |
collection | PubMed |
description | Laparoscopic abdominal surgery has become a mainstay of modern surgical practice. Postoperative analgesia is an integral component of recovery following laparoscopic abdominal surgery and may be improved by regional anesthesia or intravenous lidocaine infusion. There is inconsistent evidence supporting the use of interfascial plane blocks, such as transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, for patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery as evidenced by variable patterns of local anesthetic spread and conflicting results from studies comparing TAP blocks to local anesthetic infiltration of laparoscopic port sites and multimodal analgesia. Quadratus lumborum (QL) and erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks may provide greater areas of somatic analgesia as well as visceral analgesia, which may translate to more significant clinical benefits. Aside from the locations of the surgical incisions, it is unclear what other factors should be considered when choosing one regional technique over another or deciding to infuse lidocaine intravenously. We reviewed the current literature in attempt to clarify the roles of various regional anesthesia techniques for patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery and present one possible approach to evaluating postoperative pain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7591028 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75910282020-10-28 Interfascial Plane Blocks and Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery: A Narrative Review Jones, James Harvey Aldwinckle, Robin Local Reg Anesth Review Laparoscopic abdominal surgery has become a mainstay of modern surgical practice. Postoperative analgesia is an integral component of recovery following laparoscopic abdominal surgery and may be improved by regional anesthesia or intravenous lidocaine infusion. There is inconsistent evidence supporting the use of interfascial plane blocks, such as transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, for patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery as evidenced by variable patterns of local anesthetic spread and conflicting results from studies comparing TAP blocks to local anesthetic infiltration of laparoscopic port sites and multimodal analgesia. Quadratus lumborum (QL) and erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks may provide greater areas of somatic analgesia as well as visceral analgesia, which may translate to more significant clinical benefits. Aside from the locations of the surgical incisions, it is unclear what other factors should be considered when choosing one regional technique over another or deciding to infuse lidocaine intravenously. We reviewed the current literature in attempt to clarify the roles of various regional anesthesia techniques for patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery and present one possible approach to evaluating postoperative pain. Dove 2020-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7591028/ /pubmed/33122942 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S272694 Text en © 2020 Jones and Aldwinckle. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Review Jones, James Harvey Aldwinckle, Robin Interfascial Plane Blocks and Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery: A Narrative Review |
title | Interfascial Plane Blocks and Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery: A Narrative Review |
title_full | Interfascial Plane Blocks and Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery: A Narrative Review |
title_fullStr | Interfascial Plane Blocks and Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery: A Narrative Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Interfascial Plane Blocks and Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery: A Narrative Review |
title_short | Interfascial Plane Blocks and Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery: A Narrative Review |
title_sort | interfascial plane blocks and laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a narrative review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7591028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33122942 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S272694 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonesjamesharvey interfascialplaneblocksandlaparoscopicabdominalsurgeryanarrativereview AT aldwincklerobin interfascialplaneblocksandlaparoscopicabdominalsurgeryanarrativereview |