Cargando…

Using judgment bias test in pet and shelter dogs (Canis familiaris): Methodological and statistical caveats

It is now widely agreed that a positive affective state is a crucial component of animal well-being. The judgment bias test represents a widespread tool used to assess animals’ optimistic/pessimistic attitude and to evaluate their emotional state and welfare. Judgment bias tests have been used sever...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burani, Carlotta, Barnard, Shanis, Wells, Deborah, Pelosi, Annalisa, Valsecchi, Paola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7591058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33108399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241344
_version_ 1783600918219980800
author Burani, Carlotta
Barnard, Shanis
Wells, Deborah
Pelosi, Annalisa
Valsecchi, Paola
author_facet Burani, Carlotta
Barnard, Shanis
Wells, Deborah
Pelosi, Annalisa
Valsecchi, Paola
author_sort Burani, Carlotta
collection PubMed
description It is now widely agreed that a positive affective state is a crucial component of animal well-being. The judgment bias test represents a widespread tool used to assess animals’ optimistic/pessimistic attitude and to evaluate their emotional state and welfare. Judgment bias tests have been used several times with dogs (Canis familiaris), in most cases using a spatial test with a bowl placed in ambiguous positions located between a relatively positive trained location (P) which contains a baited bowl and a relatively negative trained location (N) which contains an empty bowl. The latency to approach the bowl in the ambiguous locations is an indicator of the dog’s expectation of a positive/negative outcome. However, results from such tests are often inconclusive. For the present study, the judgment bias test performance of 51 shelter dogs and 40 pet dogs was thoroughly analysed. A pattern emerged with shelter dogs behaving in a more pessimistic-like way than pet dogs. However, this difference between the two populations was detected only when analysing the raw latencies to reach the locations and not the more commonly applied adjusted score (i.e. average latency values). Furthermore, several methodological caveats were found. First of all, a non-negligible percentage of dogs did not pass the training phase, possibly due to the experimental paradigm not being fully suited for this species. Second, results showed a high intra-dog variability in response to the trained locations, i.e. the dogs’ responses were not consistent throughout the test, suggesting that animals may not have fully learned the association between locations and their outcomes. Third, dogs did not always behave differently towards adjacent locations, raising doubts about the animals’ ability to discriminate between locations. Finally, a potential influence of the researcher’s presence on dogs’ performance emerged from analyses. The implications of these findings and potential solutions are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7591058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75910582020-10-30 Using judgment bias test in pet and shelter dogs (Canis familiaris): Methodological and statistical caveats Burani, Carlotta Barnard, Shanis Wells, Deborah Pelosi, Annalisa Valsecchi, Paola PLoS One Research Article It is now widely agreed that a positive affective state is a crucial component of animal well-being. The judgment bias test represents a widespread tool used to assess animals’ optimistic/pessimistic attitude and to evaluate their emotional state and welfare. Judgment bias tests have been used several times with dogs (Canis familiaris), in most cases using a spatial test with a bowl placed in ambiguous positions located between a relatively positive trained location (P) which contains a baited bowl and a relatively negative trained location (N) which contains an empty bowl. The latency to approach the bowl in the ambiguous locations is an indicator of the dog’s expectation of a positive/negative outcome. However, results from such tests are often inconclusive. For the present study, the judgment bias test performance of 51 shelter dogs and 40 pet dogs was thoroughly analysed. A pattern emerged with shelter dogs behaving in a more pessimistic-like way than pet dogs. However, this difference between the two populations was detected only when analysing the raw latencies to reach the locations and not the more commonly applied adjusted score (i.e. average latency values). Furthermore, several methodological caveats were found. First of all, a non-negligible percentage of dogs did not pass the training phase, possibly due to the experimental paradigm not being fully suited for this species. Second, results showed a high intra-dog variability in response to the trained locations, i.e. the dogs’ responses were not consistent throughout the test, suggesting that animals may not have fully learned the association between locations and their outcomes. Third, dogs did not always behave differently towards adjacent locations, raising doubts about the animals’ ability to discriminate between locations. Finally, a potential influence of the researcher’s presence on dogs’ performance emerged from analyses. The implications of these findings and potential solutions are discussed. Public Library of Science 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7591058/ /pubmed/33108399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241344 Text en © 2020 Burani et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Burani, Carlotta
Barnard, Shanis
Wells, Deborah
Pelosi, Annalisa
Valsecchi, Paola
Using judgment bias test in pet and shelter dogs (Canis familiaris): Methodological and statistical caveats
title Using judgment bias test in pet and shelter dogs (Canis familiaris): Methodological and statistical caveats
title_full Using judgment bias test in pet and shelter dogs (Canis familiaris): Methodological and statistical caveats
title_fullStr Using judgment bias test in pet and shelter dogs (Canis familiaris): Methodological and statistical caveats
title_full_unstemmed Using judgment bias test in pet and shelter dogs (Canis familiaris): Methodological and statistical caveats
title_short Using judgment bias test in pet and shelter dogs (Canis familiaris): Methodological and statistical caveats
title_sort using judgment bias test in pet and shelter dogs (canis familiaris): methodological and statistical caveats
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7591058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33108399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241344
work_keys_str_mv AT buranicarlotta usingjudgmentbiastestinpetandshelterdogscanisfamiliarismethodologicalandstatisticalcaveats
AT barnardshanis usingjudgmentbiastestinpetandshelterdogscanisfamiliarismethodologicalandstatisticalcaveats
AT wellsdeborah usingjudgmentbiastestinpetandshelterdogscanisfamiliarismethodologicalandstatisticalcaveats
AT pelosiannalisa usingjudgmentbiastestinpetandshelterdogscanisfamiliarismethodologicalandstatisticalcaveats
AT valsecchipaola usingjudgmentbiastestinpetandshelterdogscanisfamiliarismethodologicalandstatisticalcaveats