Cargando…
The major satellite DNA families of the diploid Chenopodium album aggregate species: Arguments for and against the “library hypothesis”
Satellite DNA (satDNA) is one of the major fractions of the eukaryotic nuclear genome. Highly variable satDNA is involved in various genome functions, and a clear link between satellites and phenotypes exists in a wide range of organisms. However, little is known about the origin and temporal dynami...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7591062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33108401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241206 |
_version_ | 1783600919204593664 |
---|---|
author | Belyayev, Alexander Jandová, Michaela Josefiová, Jiřina Kalendar, Ruslan Mahelka, Václav Mandák, Bohumil Krak, Karol |
author_facet | Belyayev, Alexander Jandová, Michaela Josefiová, Jiřina Kalendar, Ruslan Mahelka, Václav Mandák, Bohumil Krak, Karol |
author_sort | Belyayev, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | Satellite DNA (satDNA) is one of the major fractions of the eukaryotic nuclear genome. Highly variable satDNA is involved in various genome functions, and a clear link between satellites and phenotypes exists in a wide range of organisms. However, little is known about the origin and temporal dynamics of satDNA. The “library hypothesis” indicates that the rapid evolutionary changes experienced by satDNAs are mostly quantitative. Although this hypothesis has received some confirmation, a number of its aspects are still controversial. A recently developed next-generation sequencing (NGS) method allows the determination of the satDNA landscape and could shed light on unresolved issues. Here, we explore low-coverage NGS data to infer satDNA evolution in the phylogenetic context of the diploid species of the Chenopodium album aggregate. The application of the Illumina read assembly algorithm in combination with Oxford Nanopore sequencing and fluorescent in situ hybridization allowed the estimation of eight satDNA families within the studied group, six of which were newly described. The obtained set of satDNA families of different origins can be divided into several categories, namely group-specific, lineage-specific and species-specific. In the process of evolution, satDNA families can be transmitted vertically and can be eliminated over time. Moreover, transposable element-derived satDNA families may appear repeatedly in the satellitome, creating an illusion of family conservation. Thus, the obtained data refute the “library hypothesis”, rather than confirming it, and in our opinion, it is more appropriate to speak about “the library of the mechanisms of origin”. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7591062 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75910622020-10-30 The major satellite DNA families of the diploid Chenopodium album aggregate species: Arguments for and against the “library hypothesis” Belyayev, Alexander Jandová, Michaela Josefiová, Jiřina Kalendar, Ruslan Mahelka, Václav Mandák, Bohumil Krak, Karol PLoS One Research Article Satellite DNA (satDNA) is one of the major fractions of the eukaryotic nuclear genome. Highly variable satDNA is involved in various genome functions, and a clear link between satellites and phenotypes exists in a wide range of organisms. However, little is known about the origin and temporal dynamics of satDNA. The “library hypothesis” indicates that the rapid evolutionary changes experienced by satDNAs are mostly quantitative. Although this hypothesis has received some confirmation, a number of its aspects are still controversial. A recently developed next-generation sequencing (NGS) method allows the determination of the satDNA landscape and could shed light on unresolved issues. Here, we explore low-coverage NGS data to infer satDNA evolution in the phylogenetic context of the diploid species of the Chenopodium album aggregate. The application of the Illumina read assembly algorithm in combination with Oxford Nanopore sequencing and fluorescent in situ hybridization allowed the estimation of eight satDNA families within the studied group, six of which were newly described. The obtained set of satDNA families of different origins can be divided into several categories, namely group-specific, lineage-specific and species-specific. In the process of evolution, satDNA families can be transmitted vertically and can be eliminated over time. Moreover, transposable element-derived satDNA families may appear repeatedly in the satellitome, creating an illusion of family conservation. Thus, the obtained data refute the “library hypothesis”, rather than confirming it, and in our opinion, it is more appropriate to speak about “the library of the mechanisms of origin”. Public Library of Science 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7591062/ /pubmed/33108401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241206 Text en © 2020 Belyayev et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Belyayev, Alexander Jandová, Michaela Josefiová, Jiřina Kalendar, Ruslan Mahelka, Václav Mandák, Bohumil Krak, Karol The major satellite DNA families of the diploid Chenopodium album aggregate species: Arguments for and against the “library hypothesis” |
title | The major satellite DNA families of the diploid Chenopodium album aggregate species: Arguments for and against the “library hypothesis” |
title_full | The major satellite DNA families of the diploid Chenopodium album aggregate species: Arguments for and against the “library hypothesis” |
title_fullStr | The major satellite DNA families of the diploid Chenopodium album aggregate species: Arguments for and against the “library hypothesis” |
title_full_unstemmed | The major satellite DNA families of the diploid Chenopodium album aggregate species: Arguments for and against the “library hypothesis” |
title_short | The major satellite DNA families of the diploid Chenopodium album aggregate species: Arguments for and against the “library hypothesis” |
title_sort | major satellite dna families of the diploid chenopodium album aggregate species: arguments for and against the “library hypothesis” |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7591062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33108401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241206 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT belyayevalexander themajorsatellitednafamiliesofthediploidchenopodiumalbumaggregatespeciesargumentsforandagainstthelibraryhypothesis AT jandovamichaela themajorsatellitednafamiliesofthediploidchenopodiumalbumaggregatespeciesargumentsforandagainstthelibraryhypothesis AT josefiovajirina themajorsatellitednafamiliesofthediploidchenopodiumalbumaggregatespeciesargumentsforandagainstthelibraryhypothesis AT kalendarruslan themajorsatellitednafamiliesofthediploidchenopodiumalbumaggregatespeciesargumentsforandagainstthelibraryhypothesis AT mahelkavaclav themajorsatellitednafamiliesofthediploidchenopodiumalbumaggregatespeciesargumentsforandagainstthelibraryhypothesis AT mandakbohumil themajorsatellitednafamiliesofthediploidchenopodiumalbumaggregatespeciesargumentsforandagainstthelibraryhypothesis AT krakkarol themajorsatellitednafamiliesofthediploidchenopodiumalbumaggregatespeciesargumentsforandagainstthelibraryhypothesis AT belyayevalexander majorsatellitednafamiliesofthediploidchenopodiumalbumaggregatespeciesargumentsforandagainstthelibraryhypothesis AT jandovamichaela majorsatellitednafamiliesofthediploidchenopodiumalbumaggregatespeciesargumentsforandagainstthelibraryhypothesis AT josefiovajirina majorsatellitednafamiliesofthediploidchenopodiumalbumaggregatespeciesargumentsforandagainstthelibraryhypothesis AT kalendarruslan majorsatellitednafamiliesofthediploidchenopodiumalbumaggregatespeciesargumentsforandagainstthelibraryhypothesis AT mahelkavaclav majorsatellitednafamiliesofthediploidchenopodiumalbumaggregatespeciesargumentsforandagainstthelibraryhypothesis AT mandakbohumil majorsatellitednafamiliesofthediploidchenopodiumalbumaggregatespeciesargumentsforandagainstthelibraryhypothesis AT krakkarol majorsatellitednafamiliesofthediploidchenopodiumalbumaggregatespeciesargumentsforandagainstthelibraryhypothesis |