Cargando…

Ultrasound guidance for femoral venous access in electrophysiology procedures—systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: The most common complications of electrophysiology (EP) procedures are related to vascular access. Our study aims to conduct a meta-analysis comparing ultrasound (US)-guided vs. palpation-based technique for femoral venous access in EP procedures. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kupó, Péter, Pap, Róbert, Sághy, László, Tényi, Dalma, Bálint, Alexandra, Debreceni, Dorottya, Basu-Ray, Indranill, Komócsi, András
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7591449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31823233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00683-z
_version_ 1783600996379787264
author Kupó, Péter
Pap, Róbert
Sághy, László
Tényi, Dalma
Bálint, Alexandra
Debreceni, Dorottya
Basu-Ray, Indranill
Komócsi, András
author_facet Kupó, Péter
Pap, Róbert
Sághy, László
Tényi, Dalma
Bálint, Alexandra
Debreceni, Dorottya
Basu-Ray, Indranill
Komócsi, András
author_sort Kupó, Péter
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The most common complications of electrophysiology (EP) procedures are related to vascular access. Our study aims to conduct a meta-analysis comparing ultrasound (US)-guided vs. palpation-based technique for femoral venous access in EP procedures. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched and systematically reviewed for studies comparing femoral vein puncture with/without US in EP procedures. The primary outcome was the rate of major vascular complications; secondary outcomes were minor vascular complications, inadvertent artery puncture, postprocedural groin pain, and puncture time. Predefined subgroup analysis was conducted separately for patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation procedure (PVI). A random-effects model was used to derive risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Nine studies involving 8232 patients met our inclusion criteria. Compared with the standard technique, the use of US reduced major vascular complications (from 2.01 to 0.71%, p < 0.0001). The rate of minor vascular complications (RR = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.14–0.62, p = 0.001) and inadvertent artery puncture were lower with US-guided puncture (RR = 0.31, 95% CI, 0.17–0.58, p = 0.0003). Puncture time was shorter (mean difference = − 92.1 s, 95% CI, − 142.12 – − 42.07 s, p = 0.0003) and postprocedural groin pain was less frequent (RR = 0.57, 95% CI, 0.41–0.79, p = 0.0008) in the US group. Subgroup analysis of patients undergoing PVI also showed significant reduction of major vascular complications (RR = 0.27, 95% CI, 0.12–0.64, p = 0.003) and inadvertent artery puncture (RR = 0.35, 95% CI, 0.21–0.59, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Real-time US-guidance of femoral vein puncture in EP procedures is beneficial: it reduces major and minor vascular complications, inadvertent artery puncture, postprocedural groin pain, and puncture time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7591449
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75914492020-10-29 Ultrasound guidance for femoral venous access in electrophysiology procedures—systematic review and meta-analysis Kupó, Péter Pap, Róbert Sághy, László Tényi, Dalma Bálint, Alexandra Debreceni, Dorottya Basu-Ray, Indranill Komócsi, András J Interv Card Electrophysiol Article PURPOSE: The most common complications of electrophysiology (EP) procedures are related to vascular access. Our study aims to conduct a meta-analysis comparing ultrasound (US)-guided vs. palpation-based technique for femoral venous access in EP procedures. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched and systematically reviewed for studies comparing femoral vein puncture with/without US in EP procedures. The primary outcome was the rate of major vascular complications; secondary outcomes were minor vascular complications, inadvertent artery puncture, postprocedural groin pain, and puncture time. Predefined subgroup analysis was conducted separately for patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation procedure (PVI). A random-effects model was used to derive risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Nine studies involving 8232 patients met our inclusion criteria. Compared with the standard technique, the use of US reduced major vascular complications (from 2.01 to 0.71%, p < 0.0001). The rate of minor vascular complications (RR = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.14–0.62, p = 0.001) and inadvertent artery puncture were lower with US-guided puncture (RR = 0.31, 95% CI, 0.17–0.58, p = 0.0003). Puncture time was shorter (mean difference = − 92.1 s, 95% CI, − 142.12 – − 42.07 s, p = 0.0003) and postprocedural groin pain was less frequent (RR = 0.57, 95% CI, 0.41–0.79, p = 0.0008) in the US group. Subgroup analysis of patients undergoing PVI also showed significant reduction of major vascular complications (RR = 0.27, 95% CI, 0.12–0.64, p = 0.003) and inadvertent artery puncture (RR = 0.35, 95% CI, 0.21–0.59, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Real-time US-guidance of femoral vein puncture in EP procedures is beneficial: it reduces major and minor vascular complications, inadvertent artery puncture, postprocedural groin pain, and puncture time. Springer US 2019-12-10 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7591449/ /pubmed/31823233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00683-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Kupó, Péter
Pap, Róbert
Sághy, László
Tényi, Dalma
Bálint, Alexandra
Debreceni, Dorottya
Basu-Ray, Indranill
Komócsi, András
Ultrasound guidance for femoral venous access in electrophysiology procedures—systematic review and meta-analysis
title Ultrasound guidance for femoral venous access in electrophysiology procedures—systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Ultrasound guidance for femoral venous access in electrophysiology procedures—systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Ultrasound guidance for femoral venous access in electrophysiology procedures—systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound guidance for femoral venous access in electrophysiology procedures—systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Ultrasound guidance for femoral venous access in electrophysiology procedures—systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort ultrasound guidance for femoral venous access in electrophysiology procedures—systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7591449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31823233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00683-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kupopeter ultrasoundguidanceforfemoralvenousaccessinelectrophysiologyproceduressystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT paprobert ultrasoundguidanceforfemoralvenousaccessinelectrophysiologyproceduressystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT saghylaszlo ultrasoundguidanceforfemoralvenousaccessinelectrophysiologyproceduressystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tenyidalma ultrasoundguidanceforfemoralvenousaccessinelectrophysiologyproceduressystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT balintalexandra ultrasoundguidanceforfemoralvenousaccessinelectrophysiologyproceduressystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT debrecenidorottya ultrasoundguidanceforfemoralvenousaccessinelectrophysiologyproceduressystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT basurayindranill ultrasoundguidanceforfemoralvenousaccessinelectrophysiologyproceduressystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT komocsiandras ultrasoundguidanceforfemoralvenousaccessinelectrophysiologyproceduressystematicreviewandmetaanalysis