Cargando…
Ultrasound guidance for femoral venous access in electrophysiology procedures—systematic review and meta-analysis
PURPOSE: The most common complications of electrophysiology (EP) procedures are related to vascular access. Our study aims to conduct a meta-analysis comparing ultrasound (US)-guided vs. palpation-based technique for femoral venous access in EP procedures. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7591449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31823233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00683-z |
_version_ | 1783600996379787264 |
---|---|
author | Kupó, Péter Pap, Róbert Sághy, László Tényi, Dalma Bálint, Alexandra Debreceni, Dorottya Basu-Ray, Indranill Komócsi, András |
author_facet | Kupó, Péter Pap, Róbert Sághy, László Tényi, Dalma Bálint, Alexandra Debreceni, Dorottya Basu-Ray, Indranill Komócsi, András |
author_sort | Kupó, Péter |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The most common complications of electrophysiology (EP) procedures are related to vascular access. Our study aims to conduct a meta-analysis comparing ultrasound (US)-guided vs. palpation-based technique for femoral venous access in EP procedures. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched and systematically reviewed for studies comparing femoral vein puncture with/without US in EP procedures. The primary outcome was the rate of major vascular complications; secondary outcomes were minor vascular complications, inadvertent artery puncture, postprocedural groin pain, and puncture time. Predefined subgroup analysis was conducted separately for patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation procedure (PVI). A random-effects model was used to derive risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Nine studies involving 8232 patients met our inclusion criteria. Compared with the standard technique, the use of US reduced major vascular complications (from 2.01 to 0.71%, p < 0.0001). The rate of minor vascular complications (RR = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.14–0.62, p = 0.001) and inadvertent artery puncture were lower with US-guided puncture (RR = 0.31, 95% CI, 0.17–0.58, p = 0.0003). Puncture time was shorter (mean difference = − 92.1 s, 95% CI, − 142.12 – − 42.07 s, p = 0.0003) and postprocedural groin pain was less frequent (RR = 0.57, 95% CI, 0.41–0.79, p = 0.0008) in the US group. Subgroup analysis of patients undergoing PVI also showed significant reduction of major vascular complications (RR = 0.27, 95% CI, 0.12–0.64, p = 0.003) and inadvertent artery puncture (RR = 0.35, 95% CI, 0.21–0.59, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Real-time US-guidance of femoral vein puncture in EP procedures is beneficial: it reduces major and minor vascular complications, inadvertent artery puncture, postprocedural groin pain, and puncture time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7591449 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75914492020-10-29 Ultrasound guidance for femoral venous access in electrophysiology procedures—systematic review and meta-analysis Kupó, Péter Pap, Róbert Sághy, László Tényi, Dalma Bálint, Alexandra Debreceni, Dorottya Basu-Ray, Indranill Komócsi, András J Interv Card Electrophysiol Article PURPOSE: The most common complications of electrophysiology (EP) procedures are related to vascular access. Our study aims to conduct a meta-analysis comparing ultrasound (US)-guided vs. palpation-based technique for femoral venous access in EP procedures. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched and systematically reviewed for studies comparing femoral vein puncture with/without US in EP procedures. The primary outcome was the rate of major vascular complications; secondary outcomes were minor vascular complications, inadvertent artery puncture, postprocedural groin pain, and puncture time. Predefined subgroup analysis was conducted separately for patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation procedure (PVI). A random-effects model was used to derive risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Nine studies involving 8232 patients met our inclusion criteria. Compared with the standard technique, the use of US reduced major vascular complications (from 2.01 to 0.71%, p < 0.0001). The rate of minor vascular complications (RR = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.14–0.62, p = 0.001) and inadvertent artery puncture were lower with US-guided puncture (RR = 0.31, 95% CI, 0.17–0.58, p = 0.0003). Puncture time was shorter (mean difference = − 92.1 s, 95% CI, − 142.12 – − 42.07 s, p = 0.0003) and postprocedural groin pain was less frequent (RR = 0.57, 95% CI, 0.41–0.79, p = 0.0008) in the US group. Subgroup analysis of patients undergoing PVI also showed significant reduction of major vascular complications (RR = 0.27, 95% CI, 0.12–0.64, p = 0.003) and inadvertent artery puncture (RR = 0.35, 95% CI, 0.21–0.59, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Real-time US-guidance of femoral vein puncture in EP procedures is beneficial: it reduces major and minor vascular complications, inadvertent artery puncture, postprocedural groin pain, and puncture time. Springer US 2019-12-10 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7591449/ /pubmed/31823233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00683-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Kupó, Péter Pap, Róbert Sághy, László Tényi, Dalma Bálint, Alexandra Debreceni, Dorottya Basu-Ray, Indranill Komócsi, András Ultrasound guidance for femoral venous access in electrophysiology procedures—systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Ultrasound guidance for femoral venous access in electrophysiology procedures—systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Ultrasound guidance for femoral venous access in electrophysiology procedures—systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Ultrasound guidance for femoral venous access in electrophysiology procedures—systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Ultrasound guidance for femoral venous access in electrophysiology procedures—systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Ultrasound guidance for femoral venous access in electrophysiology procedures—systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | ultrasound guidance for femoral venous access in electrophysiology procedures—systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7591449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31823233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00683-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kupopeter ultrasoundguidanceforfemoralvenousaccessinelectrophysiologyproceduressystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT paprobert ultrasoundguidanceforfemoralvenousaccessinelectrophysiologyproceduressystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT saghylaszlo ultrasoundguidanceforfemoralvenousaccessinelectrophysiologyproceduressystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tenyidalma ultrasoundguidanceforfemoralvenousaccessinelectrophysiologyproceduressystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT balintalexandra ultrasoundguidanceforfemoralvenousaccessinelectrophysiologyproceduressystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT debrecenidorottya ultrasoundguidanceforfemoralvenousaccessinelectrophysiologyproceduressystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT basurayindranill ultrasoundguidanceforfemoralvenousaccessinelectrophysiologyproceduressystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT komocsiandras ultrasoundguidanceforfemoralvenousaccessinelectrophysiologyproceduressystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |