Cargando…
Machine learning for endoleak detection after endovascular aortic repair
Diagnosis of endoleak following endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) relies on manual review of multi-slice CT angiography (CTA) by physicians which is a tedious and time-consuming process that is susceptible to error. We evaluate the use of a deep neural network for the detection of endoleak on CTA fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7591558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33110113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74936-7 |
_version_ | 1783601021297098752 |
---|---|
author | Talebi, Salmonn Madani, Mohammad H. Madani, Ali Chien, Ashley Shen, Jody Mastrodicasa, Domenico Fleischmann, Dominik Chan, Frandics P. Mofrad, Mohammad R. K. |
author_facet | Talebi, Salmonn Madani, Mohammad H. Madani, Ali Chien, Ashley Shen, Jody Mastrodicasa, Domenico Fleischmann, Dominik Chan, Frandics P. Mofrad, Mohammad R. K. |
author_sort | Talebi, Salmonn |
collection | PubMed |
description | Diagnosis of endoleak following endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) relies on manual review of multi-slice CT angiography (CTA) by physicians which is a tedious and time-consuming process that is susceptible to error. We evaluate the use of a deep neural network for the detection of endoleak on CTA for post-EVAR patients using a novel data efficient training approach. 50 CTAs and 20 CTAs with and without endoleak respectively were identified based on gold standard interpretation by a cardiovascular subspecialty radiologist. The Endoleak Augmentor, a custom designed augmentation method, provided robust training for the machine learning (ML) model. Predicted segmentation maps underwent post-processing to determine the presence of endoleak. The model was tested against 3 blinded general radiologists and 1 blinded subspecialist using a held-out subset (10 positive endoleak CTAs, 10 control CTAs). Model accuracy, precision and recall for endoleak diagnosis were 95%, 90% and 100% relative to reference subspecialist interpretation (AUC = 0.99). Accuracy, precision and recall was 70/70/70% for generalist1, 50/50/90% for generalist2, and 90/83/100% for generalist3. The blinded subspecialist had concordant interpretations for all test cases compared with the reference. In conclusion, our ML-based approach has similar performance for endoleak diagnosis relative to subspecialists and superior performance compared with generalists. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7591558 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75915582020-10-28 Machine learning for endoleak detection after endovascular aortic repair Talebi, Salmonn Madani, Mohammad H. Madani, Ali Chien, Ashley Shen, Jody Mastrodicasa, Domenico Fleischmann, Dominik Chan, Frandics P. Mofrad, Mohammad R. K. Sci Rep Article Diagnosis of endoleak following endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) relies on manual review of multi-slice CT angiography (CTA) by physicians which is a tedious and time-consuming process that is susceptible to error. We evaluate the use of a deep neural network for the detection of endoleak on CTA for post-EVAR patients using a novel data efficient training approach. 50 CTAs and 20 CTAs with and without endoleak respectively were identified based on gold standard interpretation by a cardiovascular subspecialty radiologist. The Endoleak Augmentor, a custom designed augmentation method, provided robust training for the machine learning (ML) model. Predicted segmentation maps underwent post-processing to determine the presence of endoleak. The model was tested against 3 blinded general radiologists and 1 blinded subspecialist using a held-out subset (10 positive endoleak CTAs, 10 control CTAs). Model accuracy, precision and recall for endoleak diagnosis were 95%, 90% and 100% relative to reference subspecialist interpretation (AUC = 0.99). Accuracy, precision and recall was 70/70/70% for generalist1, 50/50/90% for generalist2, and 90/83/100% for generalist3. The blinded subspecialist had concordant interpretations for all test cases compared with the reference. In conclusion, our ML-based approach has similar performance for endoleak diagnosis relative to subspecialists and superior performance compared with generalists. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7591558/ /pubmed/33110113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74936-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Talebi, Salmonn Madani, Mohammad H. Madani, Ali Chien, Ashley Shen, Jody Mastrodicasa, Domenico Fleischmann, Dominik Chan, Frandics P. Mofrad, Mohammad R. K. Machine learning for endoleak detection after endovascular aortic repair |
title | Machine learning for endoleak detection after endovascular aortic repair |
title_full | Machine learning for endoleak detection after endovascular aortic repair |
title_fullStr | Machine learning for endoleak detection after endovascular aortic repair |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine learning for endoleak detection after endovascular aortic repair |
title_short | Machine learning for endoleak detection after endovascular aortic repair |
title_sort | machine learning for endoleak detection after endovascular aortic repair |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7591558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33110113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74936-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT talebisalmonn machinelearningforendoleakdetectionafterendovascularaorticrepair AT madanimohammadh machinelearningforendoleakdetectionafterendovascularaorticrepair AT madaniali machinelearningforendoleakdetectionafterendovascularaorticrepair AT chienashley machinelearningforendoleakdetectionafterendovascularaorticrepair AT shenjody machinelearningforendoleakdetectionafterendovascularaorticrepair AT mastrodicasadomenico machinelearningforendoleakdetectionafterendovascularaorticrepair AT fleischmanndominik machinelearningforendoleakdetectionafterendovascularaorticrepair AT chanfrandicsp machinelearningforendoleakdetectionafterendovascularaorticrepair AT mofradmohammadrk machinelearningforendoleakdetectionafterendovascularaorticrepair |