Cargando…

Machine learning for endoleak detection after endovascular aortic repair

Diagnosis of endoleak following endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) relies on manual review of multi-slice CT angiography (CTA) by physicians which is a tedious and time-consuming process that is susceptible to error. We evaluate the use of a deep neural network for the detection of endoleak on CTA fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Talebi, Salmonn, Madani, Mohammad H., Madani, Ali, Chien, Ashley, Shen, Jody, Mastrodicasa, Domenico, Fleischmann, Dominik, Chan, Frandics P., Mofrad, Mohammad R. K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7591558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33110113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74936-7
_version_ 1783601021297098752
author Talebi, Salmonn
Madani, Mohammad H.
Madani, Ali
Chien, Ashley
Shen, Jody
Mastrodicasa, Domenico
Fleischmann, Dominik
Chan, Frandics P.
Mofrad, Mohammad R. K.
author_facet Talebi, Salmonn
Madani, Mohammad H.
Madani, Ali
Chien, Ashley
Shen, Jody
Mastrodicasa, Domenico
Fleischmann, Dominik
Chan, Frandics P.
Mofrad, Mohammad R. K.
author_sort Talebi, Salmonn
collection PubMed
description Diagnosis of endoleak following endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) relies on manual review of multi-slice CT angiography (CTA) by physicians which is a tedious and time-consuming process that is susceptible to error. We evaluate the use of a deep neural network for the detection of endoleak on CTA for post-EVAR patients using a novel data efficient training approach. 50 CTAs and 20 CTAs with and without endoleak respectively were identified based on gold standard interpretation by a cardiovascular subspecialty radiologist. The Endoleak Augmentor, a custom designed augmentation method, provided robust training for the machine learning (ML) model. Predicted segmentation maps underwent post-processing to determine the presence of endoleak. The model was tested against 3 blinded general radiologists and 1 blinded subspecialist using a held-out subset (10 positive endoleak CTAs, 10 control CTAs). Model accuracy, precision and recall for endoleak diagnosis were 95%, 90% and 100% relative to reference subspecialist interpretation (AUC = 0.99). Accuracy, precision and recall was 70/70/70% for generalist1, 50/50/90% for generalist2, and 90/83/100% for generalist3. The blinded subspecialist had concordant interpretations for all test cases compared with the reference. In conclusion, our ML-based approach has similar performance for endoleak diagnosis relative to subspecialists and superior performance compared with generalists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7591558
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75915582020-10-28 Machine learning for endoleak detection after endovascular aortic repair Talebi, Salmonn Madani, Mohammad H. Madani, Ali Chien, Ashley Shen, Jody Mastrodicasa, Domenico Fleischmann, Dominik Chan, Frandics P. Mofrad, Mohammad R. K. Sci Rep Article Diagnosis of endoleak following endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) relies on manual review of multi-slice CT angiography (CTA) by physicians which is a tedious and time-consuming process that is susceptible to error. We evaluate the use of a deep neural network for the detection of endoleak on CTA for post-EVAR patients using a novel data efficient training approach. 50 CTAs and 20 CTAs with and without endoleak respectively were identified based on gold standard interpretation by a cardiovascular subspecialty radiologist. The Endoleak Augmentor, a custom designed augmentation method, provided robust training for the machine learning (ML) model. Predicted segmentation maps underwent post-processing to determine the presence of endoleak. The model was tested against 3 blinded general radiologists and 1 blinded subspecialist using a held-out subset (10 positive endoleak CTAs, 10 control CTAs). Model accuracy, precision and recall for endoleak diagnosis were 95%, 90% and 100% relative to reference subspecialist interpretation (AUC = 0.99). Accuracy, precision and recall was 70/70/70% for generalist1, 50/50/90% for generalist2, and 90/83/100% for generalist3. The blinded subspecialist had concordant interpretations for all test cases compared with the reference. In conclusion, our ML-based approach has similar performance for endoleak diagnosis relative to subspecialists and superior performance compared with generalists. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7591558/ /pubmed/33110113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74936-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Talebi, Salmonn
Madani, Mohammad H.
Madani, Ali
Chien, Ashley
Shen, Jody
Mastrodicasa, Domenico
Fleischmann, Dominik
Chan, Frandics P.
Mofrad, Mohammad R. K.
Machine learning for endoleak detection after endovascular aortic repair
title Machine learning for endoleak detection after endovascular aortic repair
title_full Machine learning for endoleak detection after endovascular aortic repair
title_fullStr Machine learning for endoleak detection after endovascular aortic repair
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning for endoleak detection after endovascular aortic repair
title_short Machine learning for endoleak detection after endovascular aortic repair
title_sort machine learning for endoleak detection after endovascular aortic repair
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7591558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33110113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74936-7
work_keys_str_mv AT talebisalmonn machinelearningforendoleakdetectionafterendovascularaorticrepair
AT madanimohammadh machinelearningforendoleakdetectionafterendovascularaorticrepair
AT madaniali machinelearningforendoleakdetectionafterendovascularaorticrepair
AT chienashley machinelearningforendoleakdetectionafterendovascularaorticrepair
AT shenjody machinelearningforendoleakdetectionafterendovascularaorticrepair
AT mastrodicasadomenico machinelearningforendoleakdetectionafterendovascularaorticrepair
AT fleischmanndominik machinelearningforendoleakdetectionafterendovascularaorticrepair
AT chanfrandicsp machinelearningforendoleakdetectionafterendovascularaorticrepair
AT mofradmohammadrk machinelearningforendoleakdetectionafterendovascularaorticrepair