Cargando…

Visual contrast sensitivity could be an early marker of diabetic retinopathy

The present study aimed to explore the early predictive marker of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and to elucidate the associated demographic, metabolic, and ocular factors. We enrolled 43 type 2 diabetic subjects with mild non-proliferative retinopathy (MNPDR), 30 diabetic subjects with no retinopathy (D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pramanik, Subhasish, Chowdhury, Subhankar, Ganguly, Upasana, Banerjee, Anindita, Bhattacharya, Basudev, Mondal, Lakshmi Kanta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7591734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33145449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05336
_version_ 1783601046029860864
author Pramanik, Subhasish
Chowdhury, Subhankar
Ganguly, Upasana
Banerjee, Anindita
Bhattacharya, Basudev
Mondal, Lakshmi Kanta
author_facet Pramanik, Subhasish
Chowdhury, Subhankar
Ganguly, Upasana
Banerjee, Anindita
Bhattacharya, Basudev
Mondal, Lakshmi Kanta
author_sort Pramanik, Subhasish
collection PubMed
description The present study aimed to explore the early predictive marker of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and to elucidate the associated demographic, metabolic, and ocular factors. We enrolled 43 type 2 diabetic subjects with mild non-proliferative retinopathy (MNPDR), 30 diabetic subjects with no retinopathy (DNR), and 35 healthy controls (HC). The study groups showed no significant alteration in central macular thickness (CMT) and visual acuity (VA). The contrast sensitivity (CS) score was found to be significantly lower among DNR and MNPDR subjects compared to HCs (p < 0.0001). Between MNPDR and DNR subjects, the CS score was significantly lower in the former (p = 0.0036). CS score discriminated DNR subjects from HC, with 74% accuracy for the optimal threshold 0.71. The associated area under the ROC curve (AUC) is 0.82 (p < 0.0001) while the discrimination rule has 66% sensitivity and 80% specificity. The CS score also discriminated MNPDR subjects from DNR with 64% accuracy for the optimal threshold 0.53. The associated AUC is 0.65 (p < 0.023) and the rule has 86% sensitivity and 33% specificity. According to best subset regression analysis, not only glycaemic parameters but also lipid parameters [low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (p = 0.045) and triglycerides (TG) (p = 0.0005)] were found to be significant predictors of CS. CMT (p = 0.058) was another marginally significant predictor of CS. CS may be used as an early predictive marker for DR. So, not only hyperglycemia, but also hyperlipidemia seems to significantly affect retinal CS function in diabetes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7591734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75917342020-11-02 Visual contrast sensitivity could be an early marker of diabetic retinopathy Pramanik, Subhasish Chowdhury, Subhankar Ganguly, Upasana Banerjee, Anindita Bhattacharya, Basudev Mondal, Lakshmi Kanta Heliyon Research Article The present study aimed to explore the early predictive marker of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and to elucidate the associated demographic, metabolic, and ocular factors. We enrolled 43 type 2 diabetic subjects with mild non-proliferative retinopathy (MNPDR), 30 diabetic subjects with no retinopathy (DNR), and 35 healthy controls (HC). The study groups showed no significant alteration in central macular thickness (CMT) and visual acuity (VA). The contrast sensitivity (CS) score was found to be significantly lower among DNR and MNPDR subjects compared to HCs (p < 0.0001). Between MNPDR and DNR subjects, the CS score was significantly lower in the former (p = 0.0036). CS score discriminated DNR subjects from HC, with 74% accuracy for the optimal threshold 0.71. The associated area under the ROC curve (AUC) is 0.82 (p < 0.0001) while the discrimination rule has 66% sensitivity and 80% specificity. The CS score also discriminated MNPDR subjects from DNR with 64% accuracy for the optimal threshold 0.53. The associated AUC is 0.65 (p < 0.023) and the rule has 86% sensitivity and 33% specificity. According to best subset regression analysis, not only glycaemic parameters but also lipid parameters [low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (p = 0.045) and triglycerides (TG) (p = 0.0005)] were found to be significant predictors of CS. CMT (p = 0.058) was another marginally significant predictor of CS. CS may be used as an early predictive marker for DR. So, not only hyperglycemia, but also hyperlipidemia seems to significantly affect retinal CS function in diabetes. Elsevier 2020-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7591734/ /pubmed/33145449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05336 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Pramanik, Subhasish
Chowdhury, Subhankar
Ganguly, Upasana
Banerjee, Anindita
Bhattacharya, Basudev
Mondal, Lakshmi Kanta
Visual contrast sensitivity could be an early marker of diabetic retinopathy
title Visual contrast sensitivity could be an early marker of diabetic retinopathy
title_full Visual contrast sensitivity could be an early marker of diabetic retinopathy
title_fullStr Visual contrast sensitivity could be an early marker of diabetic retinopathy
title_full_unstemmed Visual contrast sensitivity could be an early marker of diabetic retinopathy
title_short Visual contrast sensitivity could be an early marker of diabetic retinopathy
title_sort visual contrast sensitivity could be an early marker of diabetic retinopathy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7591734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33145449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05336
work_keys_str_mv AT pramaniksubhasish visualcontrastsensitivitycouldbeanearlymarkerofdiabeticretinopathy
AT chowdhurysubhankar visualcontrastsensitivitycouldbeanearlymarkerofdiabeticretinopathy
AT gangulyupasana visualcontrastsensitivitycouldbeanearlymarkerofdiabeticretinopathy
AT banerjeeanindita visualcontrastsensitivitycouldbeanearlymarkerofdiabeticretinopathy
AT bhattacharyabasudev visualcontrastsensitivitycouldbeanearlymarkerofdiabeticretinopathy
AT mondallakshmikanta visualcontrastsensitivitycouldbeanearlymarkerofdiabeticretinopathy