Cargando…

Genetically Predicted Circulating Level of C-Reactive Protein Is Not Associated With Prostate Cancer Risk

BACKGROUND: Inconsistent findings from observational studies have reported that C-reactive protein (CRP) is likely associated with risk of prostate cancer. Because conventional observational studies are susceptible to confounding and reverse causality, it remains unclear whether there is a causal re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Chiyu, Qian, Yu, Liu, Bin, Yang, Shaoxue, Ye, Ding, Sun, Xiaohui, Chen, Tianhui, Mao, Yingying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7591790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33178578
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.545603
_version_ 1783601058520498176
author He, Chiyu
Qian, Yu
Liu, Bin
Yang, Shaoxue
Ye, Ding
Sun, Xiaohui
Chen, Tianhui
Mao, Yingying
author_facet He, Chiyu
Qian, Yu
Liu, Bin
Yang, Shaoxue
Ye, Ding
Sun, Xiaohui
Chen, Tianhui
Mao, Yingying
author_sort He, Chiyu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inconsistent findings from observational studies have reported that C-reactive protein (CRP) is likely associated with risk of prostate cancer. Because conventional observational studies are susceptible to confounding and reverse causality, it remains unclear whether there is a causal relationship of CRP with risk of prostate cancer. METHODS: In this study, we applied a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to evaluate the potential causal association of circulating CRP levels with prostate cancer risk. Instrumental variables (IVs) and corresponding genetic association estimates for circulating CRP levels were obtained from a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWASs) including 204,402 participants of European descent. The genetic association estimates of these IVs with prostate cancer were obtained from a GWAS meta-analysis including 79,148 cases and 61,106 controls of European ancestry. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was used as primary MR analyses, whereas in sensitivity analyses, MR-Egger regression, and MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) test were used to assess the presence of pleiotropy. Odd ratio (OR) and 95% CI were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, 58 single-nucleotide polymorphisms were used as instruments for circulating CRP levels. MR analysis suggested that genetically determined CRP levels were not associated with prostate cancer risk (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.16) using the IVW method. Sensitivity analyses using alternative MR methods produced similar results (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.08 for the weighted-median method; OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.08 for MR-PRESSO test). MR-Egger regression did not suggest evidence of directional pleiotropy (P = 0.25). CONCLUSION: Our study found that genetically predicted circulating CRP levels were not associated with prostate cancer risk, suggesting that CRP is unlikely to be a causal factor in the development of prostate cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7591790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75917902020-11-10 Genetically Predicted Circulating Level of C-Reactive Protein Is Not Associated With Prostate Cancer Risk He, Chiyu Qian, Yu Liu, Bin Yang, Shaoxue Ye, Ding Sun, Xiaohui Chen, Tianhui Mao, Yingying Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Inconsistent findings from observational studies have reported that C-reactive protein (CRP) is likely associated with risk of prostate cancer. Because conventional observational studies are susceptible to confounding and reverse causality, it remains unclear whether there is a causal relationship of CRP with risk of prostate cancer. METHODS: In this study, we applied a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to evaluate the potential causal association of circulating CRP levels with prostate cancer risk. Instrumental variables (IVs) and corresponding genetic association estimates for circulating CRP levels were obtained from a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWASs) including 204,402 participants of European descent. The genetic association estimates of these IVs with prostate cancer were obtained from a GWAS meta-analysis including 79,148 cases and 61,106 controls of European ancestry. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was used as primary MR analyses, whereas in sensitivity analyses, MR-Egger regression, and MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) test were used to assess the presence of pleiotropy. Odd ratio (OR) and 95% CI were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, 58 single-nucleotide polymorphisms were used as instruments for circulating CRP levels. MR analysis suggested that genetically determined CRP levels were not associated with prostate cancer risk (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.16) using the IVW method. Sensitivity analyses using alternative MR methods produced similar results (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.08 for the weighted-median method; OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.08 for MR-PRESSO test). MR-Egger regression did not suggest evidence of directional pleiotropy (P = 0.25). CONCLUSION: Our study found that genetically predicted circulating CRP levels were not associated with prostate cancer risk, suggesting that CRP is unlikely to be a causal factor in the development of prostate cancer. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7591790/ /pubmed/33178578 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.545603 Text en Copyright © 2020 He, Qian, Liu, Yang, Ye, Sun, Chen and Mao. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
He, Chiyu
Qian, Yu
Liu, Bin
Yang, Shaoxue
Ye, Ding
Sun, Xiaohui
Chen, Tianhui
Mao, Yingying
Genetically Predicted Circulating Level of C-Reactive Protein Is Not Associated With Prostate Cancer Risk
title Genetically Predicted Circulating Level of C-Reactive Protein Is Not Associated With Prostate Cancer Risk
title_full Genetically Predicted Circulating Level of C-Reactive Protein Is Not Associated With Prostate Cancer Risk
title_fullStr Genetically Predicted Circulating Level of C-Reactive Protein Is Not Associated With Prostate Cancer Risk
title_full_unstemmed Genetically Predicted Circulating Level of C-Reactive Protein Is Not Associated With Prostate Cancer Risk
title_short Genetically Predicted Circulating Level of C-Reactive Protein Is Not Associated With Prostate Cancer Risk
title_sort genetically predicted circulating level of c-reactive protein is not associated with prostate cancer risk
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7591790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33178578
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.545603
work_keys_str_mv AT hechiyu geneticallypredictedcirculatinglevelofcreactiveproteinisnotassociatedwithprostatecancerrisk
AT qianyu geneticallypredictedcirculatinglevelofcreactiveproteinisnotassociatedwithprostatecancerrisk
AT liubin geneticallypredictedcirculatinglevelofcreactiveproteinisnotassociatedwithprostatecancerrisk
AT yangshaoxue geneticallypredictedcirculatinglevelofcreactiveproteinisnotassociatedwithprostatecancerrisk
AT yeding geneticallypredictedcirculatinglevelofcreactiveproteinisnotassociatedwithprostatecancerrisk
AT sunxiaohui geneticallypredictedcirculatinglevelofcreactiveproteinisnotassociatedwithprostatecancerrisk
AT chentianhui geneticallypredictedcirculatinglevelofcreactiveproteinisnotassociatedwithprostatecancerrisk
AT maoyingying geneticallypredictedcirculatinglevelofcreactiveproteinisnotassociatedwithprostatecancerrisk