Cargando…
MyoRing Implantation with and without Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for the Management of Keratoconus
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of femtosecond laser-assisted MyoRing implantation with concurrent corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) compared to MyoRing alone for the treatment of progressive keratoconus. METHODS: A total of 60 patients were enrolled in this randomized controlled tria...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7591835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33133439 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v15i4.7790 |
_version_ | 1783601068491407360 |
---|---|
author | Mohammadpour, Mehrdad Masoumi, Ahmad Dehghan, Mahmoud Hashemian, Mohammad Nasser Karami, Shahab Addin Mahmoudi, Alireza |
author_facet | Mohammadpour, Mehrdad Masoumi, Ahmad Dehghan, Mahmoud Hashemian, Mohammad Nasser Karami, Shahab Addin Mahmoudi, Alireza |
author_sort | Mohammadpour, Mehrdad |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of femtosecond laser-assisted MyoRing implantation with concurrent corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) compared to MyoRing alone for the treatment of progressive keratoconus. METHODS: A total of 60 patients were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups. In the first group, MyoRing was implanted, while in the second, it was inserted in the corneal stroma using the same technique, along with simultaneous CXL. Visual, refractive, topographic, and abberometric outcomes were measured preoperatively and at every postoperative visit. RESULTS: Data of 47 patients were available at the end of the study; 28 in the MyoRing group and 19 in the MyoRing + CXL group. The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) improved from 0.79 [Formula: see text] 0.39 logMAR to 0.52 [Formula: see text] 0.31 logMAR (P [Formula: see text] 0.05) in the MyoRing + CXL group and from 0.65 [Formula: see text] 0.38 logMAR to 0.62 [Formula: see text] 0.23 logMAR (P = 0.70) in the MyoRing group. CDVA changed from 0.33 [Formula: see text] 0.19 logMAR to 0.25 [Formula: see text] 0.16 logMAR (P = 0.10) in the MyoRing + CXL group and 0.32 [Formula: see text] 0.22 logMAR to 0.33 [Formula: see text] 0.17 logMAR (P [Formula: see text] 0.50) in the MyoRing group. The mean keratometry (Km) decreased from 47.5 [Formula: see text] 2.7 D to 43.8 [Formula: see text] 3.2 D (P [Formula: see text] 0.001) in the MyoRing group and 49.3 [Formula: see text] 3.4 D to 45.1 [Formula: see text] 3.0 D (P [Formula: see text] 0.001) in the MyoRing + CXL group. Besides, horizontal coma was significantly lower in the MyoRing + CXL group (P = 0.022). CONCLUSION: MyoRing insertion combined with CXL is a safe and effective method for the treatment of keratoconus. The visual and topographic outcomes were comparable to that for MyoRing insertion after 10 months; however, horizontal coma was significantly lower in the MyoRing + CXL group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7591835 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75918352020-10-30 MyoRing Implantation with and without Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for the Management of Keratoconus Mohammadpour, Mehrdad Masoumi, Ahmad Dehghan, Mahmoud Hashemian, Mohammad Nasser Karami, Shahab Addin Mahmoudi, Alireza J Ophthalmic Vis Res Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of femtosecond laser-assisted MyoRing implantation with concurrent corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) compared to MyoRing alone for the treatment of progressive keratoconus. METHODS: A total of 60 patients were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups. In the first group, MyoRing was implanted, while in the second, it was inserted in the corneal stroma using the same technique, along with simultaneous CXL. Visual, refractive, topographic, and abberometric outcomes were measured preoperatively and at every postoperative visit. RESULTS: Data of 47 patients were available at the end of the study; 28 in the MyoRing group and 19 in the MyoRing + CXL group. The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) improved from 0.79 [Formula: see text] 0.39 logMAR to 0.52 [Formula: see text] 0.31 logMAR (P [Formula: see text] 0.05) in the MyoRing + CXL group and from 0.65 [Formula: see text] 0.38 logMAR to 0.62 [Formula: see text] 0.23 logMAR (P = 0.70) in the MyoRing group. CDVA changed from 0.33 [Formula: see text] 0.19 logMAR to 0.25 [Formula: see text] 0.16 logMAR (P = 0.10) in the MyoRing + CXL group and 0.32 [Formula: see text] 0.22 logMAR to 0.33 [Formula: see text] 0.17 logMAR (P [Formula: see text] 0.50) in the MyoRing group. The mean keratometry (Km) decreased from 47.5 [Formula: see text] 2.7 D to 43.8 [Formula: see text] 3.2 D (P [Formula: see text] 0.001) in the MyoRing group and 49.3 [Formula: see text] 3.4 D to 45.1 [Formula: see text] 3.0 D (P [Formula: see text] 0.001) in the MyoRing + CXL group. Besides, horizontal coma was significantly lower in the MyoRing + CXL group (P = 0.022). CONCLUSION: MyoRing insertion combined with CXL is a safe and effective method for the treatment of keratoconus. The visual and topographic outcomes were comparable to that for MyoRing insertion after 10 months; however, horizontal coma was significantly lower in the MyoRing + CXL group. PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E 2020-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7591835/ /pubmed/33133439 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v15i4.7790 Text en Copyright © 2020 Mohammadpour et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mohammadpour, Mehrdad Masoumi, Ahmad Dehghan, Mahmoud Hashemian, Mohammad Nasser Karami, Shahab Addin Mahmoudi, Alireza MyoRing Implantation with and without Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for the Management of Keratoconus |
title | MyoRing Implantation with and without Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for the Management of Keratoconus |
title_full | MyoRing Implantation with and without Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for the Management of Keratoconus |
title_fullStr | MyoRing Implantation with and without Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for the Management of Keratoconus |
title_full_unstemmed | MyoRing Implantation with and without Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for the Management of Keratoconus |
title_short | MyoRing Implantation with and without Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for the Management of Keratoconus |
title_sort | myoring implantation with and without corneal collagen crosslinking for the management of keratoconus |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7591835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33133439 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v15i4.7790 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohammadpourmehrdad myoringimplantationwithandwithoutcornealcollagencrosslinkingforthemanagementofkeratoconus AT masoumiahmad myoringimplantationwithandwithoutcornealcollagencrosslinkingforthemanagementofkeratoconus AT dehghanmahmoud myoringimplantationwithandwithoutcornealcollagencrosslinkingforthemanagementofkeratoconus AT hashemianmohammadnasser myoringimplantationwithandwithoutcornealcollagencrosslinkingforthemanagementofkeratoconus AT karamishahabaddin myoringimplantationwithandwithoutcornealcollagencrosslinkingforthemanagementofkeratoconus AT mahmoudialireza myoringimplantationwithandwithoutcornealcollagencrosslinkingforthemanagementofkeratoconus |