Cargando…

Minimally Invasive Surgery, Implantable Sensors, and Personalized Therapies

Glaucoma management has changed dramatically over the last decades, through clinical advances and technological revolutions. This review discusses the latest innovations and challenges faced in the field around three major axes: minimally-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS), implantable sensors and inj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gillmann, Kevin, Mansouri, Kaweh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7591837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33133445
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v15i4.7792
_version_ 1783601068956975104
author Gillmann, Kevin
Mansouri, Kaweh
author_facet Gillmann, Kevin
Mansouri, Kaweh
author_sort Gillmann, Kevin
collection PubMed
description Glaucoma management has changed dramatically over the last decades, through clinical advances and technological revolutions. This review discusses the latest innovations and challenges faced in the field around three major axes: minimally-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS), implantable sensors and injectable therapeutics. Indeed, the vast number of recently developed MIGS techniques has not only provided clinicians with a wide range of therapeutic options, but they have also enabled them to adjust their therapies more finely which may have contributed a more patient-centric decision-making process. Yet, despite considerable advances in the field, the wide heterogeneity in clinical trial designs blurs the surgical outcomes, specificities and indications. Thus, more high-quality data are required to make the choice of a specific MIGS procedure more than an educated guess. Beyond the scope of MIGS, the potential of IOP telemetry for self-assessment of IOP-control through implantable sensors is developing into a real option for clinicians and an empowering opportunity for patients. Indeed, providing patients with direct feedback enables them to take control and have a clearer representation of their care, in turn leading to a better control of the disease. However, there are potential issues with self-monitoring of IOP, such as increased anxiety levels induced by measured IOP fluctuations and peaks, leading to patients self-treating during IOP spikes and additional office visits. Furthermore, the advent of implantable therapeutics may soon provide yet another step towards personalized glaucoma treatment, by offering not only an efficient alternative to current treatments, but also a therapeutic option that may better adapt to patients’ lifestyle. After several decades of relative stagnation through the last century, glaucoma has now entered what many view as a golden age for the specialty. Like every revolution, this one brings its fair share of uncertainty, clinical questioning and uneasy periods of adaptation to ever-changing expectations. Yet, while it is impossible to guess what the landscape of glaucoma surgery will be like in ten or fifteen years, data suggest a bright outlook both for patients and clinicians.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7591837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75918372020-10-30 Minimally Invasive Surgery, Implantable Sensors, and Personalized Therapies Gillmann, Kevin Mansouri, Kaweh J Ophthalmic Vis Res Review Article Glaucoma management has changed dramatically over the last decades, through clinical advances and technological revolutions. This review discusses the latest innovations and challenges faced in the field around three major axes: minimally-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS), implantable sensors and injectable therapeutics. Indeed, the vast number of recently developed MIGS techniques has not only provided clinicians with a wide range of therapeutic options, but they have also enabled them to adjust their therapies more finely which may have contributed a more patient-centric decision-making process. Yet, despite considerable advances in the field, the wide heterogeneity in clinical trial designs blurs the surgical outcomes, specificities and indications. Thus, more high-quality data are required to make the choice of a specific MIGS procedure more than an educated guess. Beyond the scope of MIGS, the potential of IOP telemetry for self-assessment of IOP-control through implantable sensors is developing into a real option for clinicians and an empowering opportunity for patients. Indeed, providing patients with direct feedback enables them to take control and have a clearer representation of their care, in turn leading to a better control of the disease. However, there are potential issues with self-monitoring of IOP, such as increased anxiety levels induced by measured IOP fluctuations and peaks, leading to patients self-treating during IOP spikes and additional office visits. Furthermore, the advent of implantable therapeutics may soon provide yet another step towards personalized glaucoma treatment, by offering not only an efficient alternative to current treatments, but also a therapeutic option that may better adapt to patients’ lifestyle. After several decades of relative stagnation through the last century, glaucoma has now entered what many view as a golden age for the specialty. Like every revolution, this one brings its fair share of uncertainty, clinical questioning and uneasy periods of adaptation to ever-changing expectations. Yet, while it is impossible to guess what the landscape of glaucoma surgery will be like in ten or fifteen years, data suggest a bright outlook both for patients and clinicians. PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E 2020-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7591837/ /pubmed/33133445 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v15i4.7792 Text en Copyright © 2020 Gillmann et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Gillmann, Kevin
Mansouri, Kaweh
Minimally Invasive Surgery, Implantable Sensors, and Personalized Therapies
title Minimally Invasive Surgery, Implantable Sensors, and Personalized Therapies
title_full Minimally Invasive Surgery, Implantable Sensors, and Personalized Therapies
title_fullStr Minimally Invasive Surgery, Implantable Sensors, and Personalized Therapies
title_full_unstemmed Minimally Invasive Surgery, Implantable Sensors, and Personalized Therapies
title_short Minimally Invasive Surgery, Implantable Sensors, and Personalized Therapies
title_sort minimally invasive surgery, implantable sensors, and personalized therapies
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7591837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33133445
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v15i4.7792
work_keys_str_mv AT gillmannkevin minimallyinvasivesurgeryimplantablesensorsandpersonalizedtherapies
AT mansourikaweh minimallyinvasivesurgeryimplantablesensorsandpersonalizedtherapies