Cargando…
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain DP‐Czb53
The food enzyme α‐amylase (4‐α‐d‐glucan glucohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the genetically modified B. amyloliquefaciens strain DP‐Czb53 by Danisco US Inc. The genetic modifications do not raise safety concerns, except for the presence of a multicopy plasmid carrying known antimicrobial re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7592075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33144885 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6185 |
_version_ | 1783601123349757952 |
---|---|
author | Silano, Vittorio Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lambré, Claude Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Herman, Lieve Gomes, Ana Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Kovalkovicova, Natalia Liu, Yi Chesson, Andrew |
author_facet | Silano, Vittorio Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lambré, Claude Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Herman, Lieve Gomes, Ana Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Kovalkovicova, Natalia Liu, Yi Chesson, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | The food enzyme α‐amylase (4‐α‐d‐glucan glucohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the genetically modified B. amyloliquefaciens strain DP‐Czb53 by Danisco US Inc. The genetic modifications do not raise safety concerns, except for the presence of a multicopy plasmid carrying known antimicrobial resistance genes. However, based on the absence of viable cells and DNA from the production organism in the food enzyme, this is not considered to be a risk. The food enzyme is intended to be used in starch processing for the production of glucose syrups. Toxicological studies and dietary exposure estimation were not considered necessary. Similarity of the amino acid sequence to those of known allergens was searched and one match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood for this to occur is considered to be low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7592075 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75920752020-11-02 Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain DP‐Czb53 Silano, Vittorio Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lambré, Claude Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Herman, Lieve Gomes, Ana Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Kovalkovicova, Natalia Liu, Yi Chesson, Andrew EFSA J Scientific Opinion The food enzyme α‐amylase (4‐α‐d‐glucan glucohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the genetically modified B. amyloliquefaciens strain DP‐Czb53 by Danisco US Inc. The genetic modifications do not raise safety concerns, except for the presence of a multicopy plasmid carrying known antimicrobial resistance genes. However, based on the absence of viable cells and DNA from the production organism in the food enzyme, this is not considered to be a risk. The food enzyme is intended to be used in starch processing for the production of glucose syrups. Toxicological studies and dietary exposure estimation were not considered necessary. Similarity of the amino acid sequence to those of known allergens was searched and one match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood for this to occur is considered to be low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7592075/ /pubmed/33144885 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6185 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Silano, Vittorio Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lambré, Claude Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Herman, Lieve Gomes, Ana Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Kovalkovicova, Natalia Liu, Yi Chesson, Andrew Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain DP‐Czb53 |
title | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain DP‐Czb53 |
title_full | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain DP‐Czb53 |
title_fullStr | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain DP‐Czb53 |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain DP‐Czb53 |
title_short | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain DP‐Czb53 |
title_sort | safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain dp‐czb53 |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7592075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33144885 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6185 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstraindpczb53 AT silanovittorio safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstraindpczb53 AT baratbavierajosemanuel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstraindpczb53 AT bolognesiclaudia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstraindpczb53 AT cocconcellipiersandro safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstraindpczb53 AT crebelliriccardo safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstraindpczb53 AT gottdavidmichael safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstraindpczb53 AT grobkonrad safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstraindpczb53 AT lambreclaude safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstraindpczb53 AT lampievgenia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstraindpczb53 AT mengelersmarcel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstraindpczb53 AT mortensenalicja safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstraindpczb53 AT rivieregilles safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstraindpczb53 AT steffenseningerlise safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstraindpczb53 AT tlustoschristina safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstraindpczb53 AT vanloverenhenk safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstraindpczb53 AT vernislaurence safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstraindpczb53 AT zornholger safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstraindpczb53 AT hermanlieve safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstraindpczb53 AT gomesana safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstraindpczb53 AT andryszkiewiczmagdalena safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstraindpczb53 AT kovalkovicovanatalia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstraindpczb53 AT liuyi safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstraindpczb53 AT chessonandrew safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacillusamyloliquefaciensstraindpczb53 |