Cargando…

Linkage of maternity hospital episode statistics birth records to birth registration and notification records for births in England 2005–2006: quality assurance of linkage

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to describe the methods used to assess the quality of linkage between records of babies’ birth registration and hospital birth records, and to evaluate the potential bias that may be introduced because of these methods. DESIGN/SETTING: Data from the civi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coathup, Victoria, Macfarlane, Alison, Quigley, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7592278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33109650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037885
_version_ 1783601153223688192
author Coathup, Victoria
Macfarlane, Alison
Quigley, Maria
author_facet Coathup, Victoria
Macfarlane, Alison
Quigley, Maria
author_sort Coathup, Victoria
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to describe the methods used to assess the quality of linkage between records of babies’ birth registration and hospital birth records, and to evaluate the potential bias that may be introduced because of these methods. DESIGN/SETTING: Data from the civil registration and the notification of births previously linked by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) had been further linked to birth records from the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) for babies born in England. We developed a deterministic, six-stage algorithm to assess the quality of this linkage. PARTICIPANTS: All 1 170 790 live, singleton births, occurring in National Health Service hospitals in England between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2006. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome was the number of successful links between ONS birth records and HES birth records. Rates of successful linkage were calculated for the cohort and the characteristics associated with unsuccessful linkage were identified. RESULTS: Approximately 92% (1 074 572) of the birth registration records were successfully linked with a HES birth record. Data quality and completeness were somewhat poorer in HES birth records compared with linked birth registration and birth notification records. The quality assurance algorithms identified 1456 incorrect linkages (<1%). Compared with the linked dataset, birth records were more likely to be unlinked if babies were of white ethnic origin; born to unmarried mothers; born in East England, London, North West England or the West Midlands; or born in March. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to link administrative datasets to create large cohorts, allowing researchers to explore important questions about exposures and childhood outcomes. Missing data, coding errors and inconsistencies mean it is important that the quality of linkage is assessed prior to analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7592278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75922782020-10-29 Linkage of maternity hospital episode statistics birth records to birth registration and notification records for births in England 2005–2006: quality assurance of linkage Coathup, Victoria Macfarlane, Alison Quigley, Maria BMJ Open Health Informatics OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to describe the methods used to assess the quality of linkage between records of babies’ birth registration and hospital birth records, and to evaluate the potential bias that may be introduced because of these methods. DESIGN/SETTING: Data from the civil registration and the notification of births previously linked by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) had been further linked to birth records from the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) for babies born in England. We developed a deterministic, six-stage algorithm to assess the quality of this linkage. PARTICIPANTS: All 1 170 790 live, singleton births, occurring in National Health Service hospitals in England between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2006. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome was the number of successful links between ONS birth records and HES birth records. Rates of successful linkage were calculated for the cohort and the characteristics associated with unsuccessful linkage were identified. RESULTS: Approximately 92% (1 074 572) of the birth registration records were successfully linked with a HES birth record. Data quality and completeness were somewhat poorer in HES birth records compared with linked birth registration and birth notification records. The quality assurance algorithms identified 1456 incorrect linkages (<1%). Compared with the linked dataset, birth records were more likely to be unlinked if babies were of white ethnic origin; born to unmarried mothers; born in East England, London, North West England or the West Midlands; or born in March. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to link administrative datasets to create large cohorts, allowing researchers to explore important questions about exposures and childhood outcomes. Missing data, coding errors and inconsistencies mean it is important that the quality of linkage is assessed prior to analysis. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7592278/ /pubmed/33109650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037885 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Informatics
Coathup, Victoria
Macfarlane, Alison
Quigley, Maria
Linkage of maternity hospital episode statistics birth records to birth registration and notification records for births in England 2005–2006: quality assurance of linkage
title Linkage of maternity hospital episode statistics birth records to birth registration and notification records for births in England 2005–2006: quality assurance of linkage
title_full Linkage of maternity hospital episode statistics birth records to birth registration and notification records for births in England 2005–2006: quality assurance of linkage
title_fullStr Linkage of maternity hospital episode statistics birth records to birth registration and notification records for births in England 2005–2006: quality assurance of linkage
title_full_unstemmed Linkage of maternity hospital episode statistics birth records to birth registration and notification records for births in England 2005–2006: quality assurance of linkage
title_short Linkage of maternity hospital episode statistics birth records to birth registration and notification records for births in England 2005–2006: quality assurance of linkage
title_sort linkage of maternity hospital episode statistics birth records to birth registration and notification records for births in england 2005–2006: quality assurance of linkage
topic Health Informatics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7592278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33109650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037885
work_keys_str_mv AT coathupvictoria linkageofmaternityhospitalepisodestatisticsbirthrecordstobirthregistrationandnotificationrecordsforbirthsinengland20052006qualityassuranceoflinkage
AT macfarlanealison linkageofmaternityhospitalepisodestatisticsbirthrecordstobirthregistrationandnotificationrecordsforbirthsinengland20052006qualityassuranceoflinkage
AT quigleymaria linkageofmaternityhospitalepisodestatisticsbirthrecordstobirthregistrationandnotificationrecordsforbirthsinengland20052006qualityassuranceoflinkage