Cargando…

Developing patient-centred MRI safety culture: a quality improvement report

OBJECTIVE: Despite having a detailed MRI-safety questionnaire check at the point of referral, we have encountered a significant number of near-misses with patients being identified with MRI-Unsafe devices at the time of appointments, making this an important safety hazard. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yong, Aiwain, Kanodia, Avinash Kumar, Wendy, Milne, Pillai, Sanjay, Duncan, Gillian, Serman, Ann, Main, Gavin, Crowe, Elena, Lorimer, Kirsty, Heenan, Louise, Johnston, Marilyn, Villena, Marissa, MacFarlane, Jennifer A, Sudarshan, Thiru, Guntur Ramkumar, Prasad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7592405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33178908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20180011
_version_ 1783601177931284480
author Yong, Aiwain
Kanodia, Avinash Kumar
Wendy, Milne
Pillai, Sanjay
Duncan, Gillian
Serman, Ann
Main, Gavin
Crowe, Elena
Lorimer, Kirsty
Heenan, Louise
Johnston, Marilyn
Villena, Marissa
MacFarlane, Jennifer A
Sudarshan, Thiru
Guntur Ramkumar, Prasad
author_facet Yong, Aiwain
Kanodia, Avinash Kumar
Wendy, Milne
Pillai, Sanjay
Duncan, Gillian
Serman, Ann
Main, Gavin
Crowe, Elena
Lorimer, Kirsty
Heenan, Louise
Johnston, Marilyn
Villena, Marissa
MacFarlane, Jennifer A
Sudarshan, Thiru
Guntur Ramkumar, Prasad
author_sort Yong, Aiwain
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Despite having a detailed MRI-safety questionnaire check at the point of referral, we have encountered a significant number of near-misses with patients being identified with MRI-Unsafe devices at the time of appointments, making this an important safety hazard. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A two-part survey was performed to assess referrer compliance of asking MRI-questionnaires. 120 outpatients across 3 MRI sites were interviewed at the time of appointment to confirm whether their referrers completed the MRI questionnaires with them at the time of referral. Location: Department of Radiology, Ninewells Hospital, Perth Royal Infirmary and Stracathro Hospital in Scotland. RESULTS: Only 50–55 % of patients confirmed that they were asked about presence of a pacemaker at the point of referral. Less than 50 % of patients reported being asked about other potential hazards. Suggested strategies for change: (1) Risk Alert—Sent to all MRI referrers in the organization. ( 2) Changes to MRI Safety Questionnaire. (3) Feedback mechanism to referrers—NHS trust website publications on number of recorded near-misses and wasted appointments due to MRI-safety issues. (4) Compulsory education/training of future referrers (junior doctors/allied health professionals). (5) Education of patients/public on MRI safety—Displaying patient information leaflets/posters in waiting areas of the hospital. Key measures for improvement: (1) Reduction in number of recorded near-misses. (2) System improvements, referrer and patient education, reduction of wasted MRI appointments and improvement of waiting-times for MRI appointments Effects of survey and conclusions: The survey highlights the possibility of inadequate referrer attention, and poor patient communication about MRI safety questionnaire with regards to potential hazards of MRI examination in presence of undeclared implants. It initiated several interventions resulting in improved patient safety, with no events in next 12 months, whilst promoting public and referrer’s understanding of potential MRI safety issues. Such actions are recommended for all NHS centres across UK since there are significant similarities in functioning across UK.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7592405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75924052020-11-10 Developing patient-centred MRI safety culture: a quality improvement report Yong, Aiwain Kanodia, Avinash Kumar Wendy, Milne Pillai, Sanjay Duncan, Gillian Serman, Ann Main, Gavin Crowe, Elena Lorimer, Kirsty Heenan, Louise Johnston, Marilyn Villena, Marissa MacFarlane, Jennifer A Sudarshan, Thiru Guntur Ramkumar, Prasad BJR Open Practice and Policy OBJECTIVE: Despite having a detailed MRI-safety questionnaire check at the point of referral, we have encountered a significant number of near-misses with patients being identified with MRI-Unsafe devices at the time of appointments, making this an important safety hazard. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A two-part survey was performed to assess referrer compliance of asking MRI-questionnaires. 120 outpatients across 3 MRI sites were interviewed at the time of appointment to confirm whether their referrers completed the MRI questionnaires with them at the time of referral. Location: Department of Radiology, Ninewells Hospital, Perth Royal Infirmary and Stracathro Hospital in Scotland. RESULTS: Only 50–55 % of patients confirmed that they were asked about presence of a pacemaker at the point of referral. Less than 50 % of patients reported being asked about other potential hazards. Suggested strategies for change: (1) Risk Alert—Sent to all MRI referrers in the organization. ( 2) Changes to MRI Safety Questionnaire. (3) Feedback mechanism to referrers—NHS trust website publications on number of recorded near-misses and wasted appointments due to MRI-safety issues. (4) Compulsory education/training of future referrers (junior doctors/allied health professionals). (5) Education of patients/public on MRI safety—Displaying patient information leaflets/posters in waiting areas of the hospital. Key measures for improvement: (1) Reduction in number of recorded near-misses. (2) System improvements, referrer and patient education, reduction of wasted MRI appointments and improvement of waiting-times for MRI appointments Effects of survey and conclusions: The survey highlights the possibility of inadequate referrer attention, and poor patient communication about MRI safety questionnaire with regards to potential hazards of MRI examination in presence of undeclared implants. It initiated several interventions resulting in improved patient safety, with no events in next 12 months, whilst promoting public and referrer’s understanding of potential MRI safety issues. Such actions are recommended for all NHS centres across UK since there are significant similarities in functioning across UK. The British Institute of Radiology. 2019-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7592405/ /pubmed/33178908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20180011 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reprhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/, which permits unrestricted non-commercial reuse, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Practice and Policy
Yong, Aiwain
Kanodia, Avinash Kumar
Wendy, Milne
Pillai, Sanjay
Duncan, Gillian
Serman, Ann
Main, Gavin
Crowe, Elena
Lorimer, Kirsty
Heenan, Louise
Johnston, Marilyn
Villena, Marissa
MacFarlane, Jennifer A
Sudarshan, Thiru
Guntur Ramkumar, Prasad
Developing patient-centred MRI safety culture: a quality improvement report
title Developing patient-centred MRI safety culture: a quality improvement report
title_full Developing patient-centred MRI safety culture: a quality improvement report
title_fullStr Developing patient-centred MRI safety culture: a quality improvement report
title_full_unstemmed Developing patient-centred MRI safety culture: a quality improvement report
title_short Developing patient-centred MRI safety culture: a quality improvement report
title_sort developing patient-centred mri safety culture: a quality improvement report
topic Practice and Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7592405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33178908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20180011
work_keys_str_mv AT yongaiwain developingpatientcentredmrisafetycultureaqualityimprovementreport
AT kanodiaavinashkumar developingpatientcentredmrisafetycultureaqualityimprovementreport
AT wendymilne developingpatientcentredmrisafetycultureaqualityimprovementreport
AT pillaisanjay developingpatientcentredmrisafetycultureaqualityimprovementreport
AT duncangillian developingpatientcentredmrisafetycultureaqualityimprovementreport
AT sermanann developingpatientcentredmrisafetycultureaqualityimprovementreport
AT maingavin developingpatientcentredmrisafetycultureaqualityimprovementreport
AT croweelena developingpatientcentredmrisafetycultureaqualityimprovementreport
AT lorimerkirsty developingpatientcentredmrisafetycultureaqualityimprovementreport
AT heenanlouise developingpatientcentredmrisafetycultureaqualityimprovementreport
AT johnstonmarilyn developingpatientcentredmrisafetycultureaqualityimprovementreport
AT villenamarissa developingpatientcentredmrisafetycultureaqualityimprovementreport
AT macfarlanejennifera developingpatientcentredmrisafetycultureaqualityimprovementreport
AT sudarshanthiru developingpatientcentredmrisafetycultureaqualityimprovementreport
AT gunturramkumarprasad developingpatientcentredmrisafetycultureaqualityimprovementreport