Cargando…

Effectiveness of a small breast screening programme: 25 year evaluation (25 year breast screening evaluation)

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate mammography screening quality on the Island of Jersey over a 25-year period from Jan 1990 to end March 2015 from females invited between ages 50 to 75 using a 2 yearly screening interval. Jersey had a population of only around 67,000 at onset, rising to around 100,000 at the e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nisbet, Andrew Patric, Borthwick-Clarke, Andrew, Scott, Nic, Goulding, Helen, Jane, Harwood
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7592412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33178914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20180018
_version_ 1783601179737980928
author Nisbet, Andrew Patric
Borthwick-Clarke, Andrew
Scott, Nic
Goulding, Helen
Jane, Harwood
author_facet Nisbet, Andrew Patric
Borthwick-Clarke, Andrew
Scott, Nic
Goulding, Helen
Jane, Harwood
author_sort Nisbet, Andrew Patric
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate mammography screening quality on the Island of Jersey over a 25-year period from Jan 1990 to end March 2015 from females invited between ages 50 to 75 using a 2 yearly screening interval. Jersey had a population of only around 67,000 at onset, rising to around 100,000 at the end of the 25 years. METHODS: An analysis was performed of key routinely collected measures that are important to determining if a screening programme is on course to reduce breast cancer mortality such as uptake, recall rates, screen detected cancer and interval cancer rates. Further supporting indicators including grade, stage and comparative deaths from breast cancer in screen detected and not screen detected females were also assessed. RESULTS: Over the 25-year period 19,768 females were invited to screening and 16,866 attended, giving an uptake of 85.2%. There were 501 screen detected cancers of which 400 were invasive, and 101 DCIS. 125 interval cancers presented outside screening over the 25 years. The annual recall rate over the last 20 years was <6% for prevalent round and 4% for incident round screening. Based on the standardized detection ratio (SDR) and uptake, the estimated reduction in mortality from breast cancer was calculated as 40.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Recommended population sizes for breast units range from a quarter to half a million people. For very small units like Jersey serving smaller populations, rigorous quality control is essential to maintain credibility. Despite the small size of the programme evidence shows a similar detection rate to the UK NHS Breast screening programme was achieved. In small programmes careful monitoring of rates of uptake, recall, cancer detection and interval rates are required over adequate time periods together with supporting information to show that small units can achieve national standards and detection rates necessary to reduce breast cancer mortality. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Running a small breast cancer screening programme is challenging for quality control. The impact on mortality can be predicted for small screening programmes despite their size. 10-year group survival in screen detected invasive breast cancer >90%. Interval cancers are more advanced than screen detected invasive cancers, so high suspicion is still required in breast symptoms after "normal" screen result. Mortality in lapsed/ceased attenders suggest that extending age range could be beneficial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7592412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75924122020-11-10 Effectiveness of a small breast screening programme: 25 year evaluation (25 year breast screening evaluation) Nisbet, Andrew Patric Borthwick-Clarke, Andrew Scott, Nic Goulding, Helen Jane, Harwood BJR Open Original Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate mammography screening quality on the Island of Jersey over a 25-year period from Jan 1990 to end March 2015 from females invited between ages 50 to 75 using a 2 yearly screening interval. Jersey had a population of only around 67,000 at onset, rising to around 100,000 at the end of the 25 years. METHODS: An analysis was performed of key routinely collected measures that are important to determining if a screening programme is on course to reduce breast cancer mortality such as uptake, recall rates, screen detected cancer and interval cancer rates. Further supporting indicators including grade, stage and comparative deaths from breast cancer in screen detected and not screen detected females were also assessed. RESULTS: Over the 25-year period 19,768 females were invited to screening and 16,866 attended, giving an uptake of 85.2%. There were 501 screen detected cancers of which 400 were invasive, and 101 DCIS. 125 interval cancers presented outside screening over the 25 years. The annual recall rate over the last 20 years was <6% for prevalent round and 4% for incident round screening. Based on the standardized detection ratio (SDR) and uptake, the estimated reduction in mortality from breast cancer was calculated as 40.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Recommended population sizes for breast units range from a quarter to half a million people. For very small units like Jersey serving smaller populations, rigorous quality control is essential to maintain credibility. Despite the small size of the programme evidence shows a similar detection rate to the UK NHS Breast screening programme was achieved. In small programmes careful monitoring of rates of uptake, recall, cancer detection and interval rates are required over adequate time periods together with supporting information to show that small units can achieve national standards and detection rates necessary to reduce breast cancer mortality. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Running a small breast cancer screening programme is challenging for quality control. The impact on mortality can be predicted for small screening programmes despite their size. 10-year group survival in screen detected invasive breast cancer >90%. Interval cancers are more advanced than screen detected invasive cancers, so high suspicion is still required in breast symptoms after "normal" screen result. Mortality in lapsed/ceased attenders suggest that extending age range could be beneficial. The British Institute of Radiology. 2019-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7592412/ /pubmed/33178914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20180018 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Nisbet, Andrew Patric
Borthwick-Clarke, Andrew
Scott, Nic
Goulding, Helen
Jane, Harwood
Effectiveness of a small breast screening programme: 25 year evaluation (25 year breast screening evaluation)
title Effectiveness of a small breast screening programme: 25 year evaluation (25 year breast screening evaluation)
title_full Effectiveness of a small breast screening programme: 25 year evaluation (25 year breast screening evaluation)
title_fullStr Effectiveness of a small breast screening programme: 25 year evaluation (25 year breast screening evaluation)
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of a small breast screening programme: 25 year evaluation (25 year breast screening evaluation)
title_short Effectiveness of a small breast screening programme: 25 year evaluation (25 year breast screening evaluation)
title_sort effectiveness of a small breast screening programme: 25 year evaluation (25 year breast screening evaluation)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7592412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33178914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20180018
work_keys_str_mv AT nisbetandrewpatric effectivenessofasmallbreastscreeningprogramme25yearevaluation25yearbreastscreeningevaluation
AT borthwickclarkeandrew effectivenessofasmallbreastscreeningprogramme25yearevaluation25yearbreastscreeningevaluation
AT scottnic effectivenessofasmallbreastscreeningprogramme25yearevaluation25yearbreastscreeningevaluation
AT gouldinghelen effectivenessofasmallbreastscreeningprogramme25yearevaluation25yearbreastscreeningevaluation
AT janeharwood effectivenessofasmallbreastscreeningprogramme25yearevaluation25yearbreastscreeningevaluation