Cargando…

Public attitudes towards screening for kidney cancer: an online survey

BACKGROUND: Kidney cancer is often asymptomatic, leading to proposals for a screening programme. The views of the public towards introducing a new screening programme for kidney cancer are unknown. The aim of this study was to explore attitudes towards kidney cancer screening and factors influencing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harvey-Kelly, Laragh L. W., Harrison, Hannah, Rossi, Sabrina H., Griffin, Simon J., Stewart, Grant D., Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7592501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33115457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-00724-0
_version_ 1783601199067430912
author Harvey-Kelly, Laragh L. W.
Harrison, Hannah
Rossi, Sabrina H.
Griffin, Simon J.
Stewart, Grant D.
Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
author_facet Harvey-Kelly, Laragh L. W.
Harrison, Hannah
Rossi, Sabrina H.
Griffin, Simon J.
Stewart, Grant D.
Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
author_sort Harvey-Kelly, Laragh L. W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Kidney cancer is often asymptomatic, leading to proposals for a screening programme. The views of the public towards introducing a new screening programme for kidney cancer are unknown. The aim of this study was to explore attitudes towards kidney cancer screening and factors influencing intention to attend a future screening programme. METHODS: We conducted an online population-based survey of 1021 adults aged 45–77 years. The main outcome measure was intention to attend four possible screening tests (urine, blood, ultrasound scan, low-dose CT) as well as extended low-dose CT scans within lung cancer screening programmes. We used multivariable regression to examine the association between intention and each screening test. RESULTS: Most participants stated that they would be ‘very likely’ or ‘likely’ to undergo each of the screening tests [urine test: n = 961 (94.1%); blood test: n = 922 (90.3%); ultrasound: n = 914 (89.5%); low-dose CT: n = 804 (78.8%); lung CT: n = 962 (95.2%)]. Greater intention to attend was associated with higher general cancer worry and less perceived burden/inconvenience about the screening tests. Less worry about the screening test was also associated with higher intention to attend, but only in those with low general cancer worry (cancer worry scale ≤ 5). Compared with intention to take up screening with a urine test, participants were half as likely to report that they intended to undergo blood [OR 0.56 (0.43–0.73)] or ultrasound [OR 0.50 (0.38–0.67)] testing, and half as likely again to report that they intended to take part in a screening programme featuring a low dose CT scan for kidney cancer screening alone [OR 0.19 (0.14–0.27)]. CONCLUSION: Participants in this study expressed high levels of intention to accept an invitation to screening for kidney cancer, both within a kidney cancer specific screening programme and in conjunction with lung cancer screening. The choice of screening test is likely to influence uptake. Together these findings support on-going research into kidney cancer screening tests and the potential for combining kidney cancer screening with existing or new screening programmes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7592501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75925012020-10-29 Public attitudes towards screening for kidney cancer: an online survey Harvey-Kelly, Laragh L. W. Harrison, Hannah Rossi, Sabrina H. Griffin, Simon J. Stewart, Grant D. Usher-Smith, Juliet A. BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUND: Kidney cancer is often asymptomatic, leading to proposals for a screening programme. The views of the public towards introducing a new screening programme for kidney cancer are unknown. The aim of this study was to explore attitudes towards kidney cancer screening and factors influencing intention to attend a future screening programme. METHODS: We conducted an online population-based survey of 1021 adults aged 45–77 years. The main outcome measure was intention to attend four possible screening tests (urine, blood, ultrasound scan, low-dose CT) as well as extended low-dose CT scans within lung cancer screening programmes. We used multivariable regression to examine the association between intention and each screening test. RESULTS: Most participants stated that they would be ‘very likely’ or ‘likely’ to undergo each of the screening tests [urine test: n = 961 (94.1%); blood test: n = 922 (90.3%); ultrasound: n = 914 (89.5%); low-dose CT: n = 804 (78.8%); lung CT: n = 962 (95.2%)]. Greater intention to attend was associated with higher general cancer worry and less perceived burden/inconvenience about the screening tests. Less worry about the screening test was also associated with higher intention to attend, but only in those with low general cancer worry (cancer worry scale ≤ 5). Compared with intention to take up screening with a urine test, participants were half as likely to report that they intended to undergo blood [OR 0.56 (0.43–0.73)] or ultrasound [OR 0.50 (0.38–0.67)] testing, and half as likely again to report that they intended to take part in a screening programme featuring a low dose CT scan for kidney cancer screening alone [OR 0.19 (0.14–0.27)]. CONCLUSION: Participants in this study expressed high levels of intention to accept an invitation to screening for kidney cancer, both within a kidney cancer specific screening programme and in conjunction with lung cancer screening. The choice of screening test is likely to influence uptake. Together these findings support on-going research into kidney cancer screening tests and the potential for combining kidney cancer screening with existing or new screening programmes. BioMed Central 2020-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7592501/ /pubmed/33115457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-00724-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Harvey-Kelly, Laragh L. W.
Harrison, Hannah
Rossi, Sabrina H.
Griffin, Simon J.
Stewart, Grant D.
Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
Public attitudes towards screening for kidney cancer: an online survey
title Public attitudes towards screening for kidney cancer: an online survey
title_full Public attitudes towards screening for kidney cancer: an online survey
title_fullStr Public attitudes towards screening for kidney cancer: an online survey
title_full_unstemmed Public attitudes towards screening for kidney cancer: an online survey
title_short Public attitudes towards screening for kidney cancer: an online survey
title_sort public attitudes towards screening for kidney cancer: an online survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7592501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33115457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-00724-0
work_keys_str_mv AT harveykellylaraghlw publicattitudestowardsscreeningforkidneycanceranonlinesurvey
AT harrisonhannah publicattitudestowardsscreeningforkidneycanceranonlinesurvey
AT rossisabrinah publicattitudestowardsscreeningforkidneycanceranonlinesurvey
AT griffinsimonj publicattitudestowardsscreeningforkidneycanceranonlinesurvey
AT stewartgrantd publicattitudestowardsscreeningforkidneycanceranonlinesurvey
AT ushersmithjulieta publicattitudestowardsscreeningforkidneycanceranonlinesurvey