Cargando…
A novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
BACKGROUND: To introduce a novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 300 patients with PCa who received surgical treatment between November 2010 and June 2015 at our institution....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7592506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33109205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02051-y |
_version_ | 1783601200037363712 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Ben Peng, Yi-ji Ma, Guo-zhong Zhang, Qian |
author_facet | Xu, Ben Peng, Yi-ji Ma, Guo-zhong Zhang, Qian |
author_sort | Xu, Ben |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To introduce a novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 300 patients with PCa who received surgical treatment between November 2010 and June 2015 at our institution. They were divided into group A, three-port LRP; group B, conventional four-five-port LRP; group C, open RP (ORP); and group D, robotic-assisted RP (RARP). A learning curve was analyzed by dividing patients of group A into the early and late stages. RESULTS: All groups were comparable with regard to the preoperative characteristics except for the relatively smaller prostate volume in group A. The three-port LRP operations were performed successfully with only 8 cases of conversion to the conventional LRP. None of any severe complications or conversion to ORP occurred. In group A, the mean operative time (OT) duration was 113.8 min, the mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 94.2 ml, the mean drainage days was 4.0 days, the mean hospitalization was 5.1 days, and 27.8% of the prostate specimen margins (PSM) were positive. The differences of OT, EBL, drainage days, hospitalization, and transfusion in group A were statistically significant among the majority of the other groups (p < 0.05). After undergoing the early stages of a learning curve analysis in three-port LRP, the EBL was obviously decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Three-port LRP is a novel technique that exhibits superior intraoperative advantages to the conventional LRP. Due to its less OT, EBL, drainage days, hospitalization, and transfusion with a shorter learning curve, it should be recommended and popularized in the clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7592506 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75925062020-10-29 A novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy Xu, Ben Peng, Yi-ji Ma, Guo-zhong Zhang, Qian World J Surg Oncol Technical Innovations BACKGROUND: To introduce a novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 300 patients with PCa who received surgical treatment between November 2010 and June 2015 at our institution. They were divided into group A, three-port LRP; group B, conventional four-five-port LRP; group C, open RP (ORP); and group D, robotic-assisted RP (RARP). A learning curve was analyzed by dividing patients of group A into the early and late stages. RESULTS: All groups were comparable with regard to the preoperative characteristics except for the relatively smaller prostate volume in group A. The three-port LRP operations were performed successfully with only 8 cases of conversion to the conventional LRP. None of any severe complications or conversion to ORP occurred. In group A, the mean operative time (OT) duration was 113.8 min, the mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 94.2 ml, the mean drainage days was 4.0 days, the mean hospitalization was 5.1 days, and 27.8% of the prostate specimen margins (PSM) were positive. The differences of OT, EBL, drainage days, hospitalization, and transfusion in group A were statistically significant among the majority of the other groups (p < 0.05). After undergoing the early stages of a learning curve analysis in three-port LRP, the EBL was obviously decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Three-port LRP is a novel technique that exhibits superior intraoperative advantages to the conventional LRP. Due to its less OT, EBL, drainage days, hospitalization, and transfusion with a shorter learning curve, it should be recommended and popularized in the clinical practice. BioMed Central 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7592506/ /pubmed/33109205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02051-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Technical Innovations Xu, Ben Peng, Yi-ji Ma, Guo-zhong Zhang, Qian A novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy |
title | A novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy |
title_full | A novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy |
title_fullStr | A novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | A novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy |
title_short | A novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy |
title_sort | novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy |
topic | Technical Innovations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7592506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33109205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02051-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xuben anovelthreeporttrocarplacementtechniqueforlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy AT pengyiji anovelthreeporttrocarplacementtechniqueforlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy AT maguozhong anovelthreeporttrocarplacementtechniqueforlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy AT zhangqian anovelthreeporttrocarplacementtechniqueforlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy AT xuben novelthreeporttrocarplacementtechniqueforlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy AT pengyiji novelthreeporttrocarplacementtechniqueforlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy AT maguozhong novelthreeporttrocarplacementtechniqueforlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy AT zhangqian novelthreeporttrocarplacementtechniqueforlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy |