Cargando…

A novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND: To introduce a novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 300 patients with PCa who received surgical treatment between November 2010 and June 2015 at our institution....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Ben, Peng, Yi-ji, Ma, Guo-zhong, Zhang, Qian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7592506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33109205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02051-y
_version_ 1783601200037363712
author Xu, Ben
Peng, Yi-ji
Ma, Guo-zhong
Zhang, Qian
author_facet Xu, Ben
Peng, Yi-ji
Ma, Guo-zhong
Zhang, Qian
author_sort Xu, Ben
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To introduce a novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 300 patients with PCa who received surgical treatment between November 2010 and June 2015 at our institution. They were divided into group A, three-port LRP; group B, conventional four-five-port LRP; group C, open RP (ORP); and group D, robotic-assisted RP (RARP). A learning curve was analyzed by dividing patients of group A into the early and late stages. RESULTS: All groups were comparable with regard to the preoperative characteristics except for the relatively smaller prostate volume in group A. The three-port LRP operations were performed successfully with only 8 cases of conversion to the conventional LRP. None of any severe complications or conversion to ORP occurred. In group A, the mean operative time (OT) duration was 113.8 min, the mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 94.2 ml, the mean drainage days was 4.0 days, the mean hospitalization was 5.1 days, and 27.8% of the prostate specimen margins (PSM) were positive. The differences of OT, EBL, drainage days, hospitalization, and transfusion in group A were statistically significant among the majority of the other groups (p < 0.05). After undergoing the early stages of a learning curve analysis in three-port LRP, the EBL was obviously decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Three-port LRP is a novel technique that exhibits superior intraoperative advantages to the conventional LRP. Due to its less OT, EBL, drainage days, hospitalization, and transfusion with a shorter learning curve, it should be recommended and popularized in the clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7592506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75925062020-10-29 A novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy Xu, Ben Peng, Yi-ji Ma, Guo-zhong Zhang, Qian World J Surg Oncol Technical Innovations BACKGROUND: To introduce a novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 300 patients with PCa who received surgical treatment between November 2010 and June 2015 at our institution. They were divided into group A, three-port LRP; group B, conventional four-five-port LRP; group C, open RP (ORP); and group D, robotic-assisted RP (RARP). A learning curve was analyzed by dividing patients of group A into the early and late stages. RESULTS: All groups were comparable with regard to the preoperative characteristics except for the relatively smaller prostate volume in group A. The three-port LRP operations were performed successfully with only 8 cases of conversion to the conventional LRP. None of any severe complications or conversion to ORP occurred. In group A, the mean operative time (OT) duration was 113.8 min, the mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 94.2 ml, the mean drainage days was 4.0 days, the mean hospitalization was 5.1 days, and 27.8% of the prostate specimen margins (PSM) were positive. The differences of OT, EBL, drainage days, hospitalization, and transfusion in group A were statistically significant among the majority of the other groups (p < 0.05). After undergoing the early stages of a learning curve analysis in three-port LRP, the EBL was obviously decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Three-port LRP is a novel technique that exhibits superior intraoperative advantages to the conventional LRP. Due to its less OT, EBL, drainage days, hospitalization, and transfusion with a shorter learning curve, it should be recommended and popularized in the clinical practice. BioMed Central 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7592506/ /pubmed/33109205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02051-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Technical Innovations
Xu, Ben
Peng, Yi-ji
Ma, Guo-zhong
Zhang, Qian
A novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
title A novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
title_full A novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
title_fullStr A novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed A novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
title_short A novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
title_sort novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
topic Technical Innovations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7592506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33109205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02051-y
work_keys_str_mv AT xuben anovelthreeporttrocarplacementtechniqueforlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT pengyiji anovelthreeporttrocarplacementtechniqueforlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT maguozhong anovelthreeporttrocarplacementtechniqueforlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT zhangqian anovelthreeporttrocarplacementtechniqueforlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT xuben novelthreeporttrocarplacementtechniqueforlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT pengyiji novelthreeporttrocarplacementtechniqueforlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT maguozhong novelthreeporttrocarplacementtechniqueforlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT zhangqian novelthreeporttrocarplacementtechniqueforlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy