Cargando…
Development of a core outcome set for use in community-based bipolar trials—A qualitative study and modified Delphi
BACKGROUND: A core outcome set (COS) is a standardised collection of outcomes to be collected and reported in all trials within a research area. A COS can reduce reporting bias and facilitate evidence synthesis. This is currently unavailable for use in community-based bipolar trials. This research a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7592842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33112874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240518 |
_version_ | 1783601261948436480 |
---|---|
author | Retzer, Ameeta Sayers, Ruth Pinfold, Vanessa Gibson, John Keeley, Thomas Taylor, Gemma Plappert, Humera Gibbons, Bliss Huxley, Peter Mathers, Jonathan Birchwood, Maximillian Calvert, Melanie |
author_facet | Retzer, Ameeta Sayers, Ruth Pinfold, Vanessa Gibson, John Keeley, Thomas Taylor, Gemma Plappert, Humera Gibbons, Bliss Huxley, Peter Mathers, Jonathan Birchwood, Maximillian Calvert, Melanie |
author_sort | Retzer, Ameeta |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A core outcome set (COS) is a standardised collection of outcomes to be collected and reported in all trials within a research area. A COS can reduce reporting bias and facilitate evidence synthesis. This is currently unavailable for use in community-based bipolar trials. This research aimed to develop such a COS, with input from a full range of stakeholders. METHODS: A co-production approach was used throughout. A longlist of outcomes was derived from focus groups with people with a bipolar diagnosis and carers, interviews with healthcare professionals and a rapid review of outcomes listed in bipolar trials on the Cochrane database. An expert panel with personal and/or professional experience of bipolar participated in a modified Delphi process and the COS was finalised at a consensus meeting. RESULTS: Fifty participants rated the importance of each outcome. Sixty-six outcomes were included in Round 1 of the questionnaire; 13 outcomes were added by Round 1 participants and were rated in Round 2. Seventy-six percent of participants (n = 38) returned to Round 2 and 60 outcomes, including 4 outcomes added by participants in Round 1, received a rating of 7–9 by >70% and 1–3 by <25% of the sample. Fourteen participants finalised a COS containing 11 outcomes at the consensus meeting: personal recovery; connectedness; clinical recovery of bipolar symptoms; mental health and wellbeing; physical health; self-monitoring and management; medication effects; quality of life; service outcomes; experience of care; and use of coercion. CONCLUSIONS: This COS is recommended for use in community-based bipolar trials to ensure stakeholder-relevant outcomes, facilitate data synthesis, and transparent reporting. The COS includes guidance notes for each outcome to allow the identification of suitable measurement instruments. Further validation is recommended for use with a wide range of communities and to achieve standardised measurement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7592842 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75928422020-11-02 Development of a core outcome set for use in community-based bipolar trials—A qualitative study and modified Delphi Retzer, Ameeta Sayers, Ruth Pinfold, Vanessa Gibson, John Keeley, Thomas Taylor, Gemma Plappert, Humera Gibbons, Bliss Huxley, Peter Mathers, Jonathan Birchwood, Maximillian Calvert, Melanie PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: A core outcome set (COS) is a standardised collection of outcomes to be collected and reported in all trials within a research area. A COS can reduce reporting bias and facilitate evidence synthesis. This is currently unavailable for use in community-based bipolar trials. This research aimed to develop such a COS, with input from a full range of stakeholders. METHODS: A co-production approach was used throughout. A longlist of outcomes was derived from focus groups with people with a bipolar diagnosis and carers, interviews with healthcare professionals and a rapid review of outcomes listed in bipolar trials on the Cochrane database. An expert panel with personal and/or professional experience of bipolar participated in a modified Delphi process and the COS was finalised at a consensus meeting. RESULTS: Fifty participants rated the importance of each outcome. Sixty-six outcomes were included in Round 1 of the questionnaire; 13 outcomes were added by Round 1 participants and were rated in Round 2. Seventy-six percent of participants (n = 38) returned to Round 2 and 60 outcomes, including 4 outcomes added by participants in Round 1, received a rating of 7–9 by >70% and 1–3 by <25% of the sample. Fourteen participants finalised a COS containing 11 outcomes at the consensus meeting: personal recovery; connectedness; clinical recovery of bipolar symptoms; mental health and wellbeing; physical health; self-monitoring and management; medication effects; quality of life; service outcomes; experience of care; and use of coercion. CONCLUSIONS: This COS is recommended for use in community-based bipolar trials to ensure stakeholder-relevant outcomes, facilitate data synthesis, and transparent reporting. The COS includes guidance notes for each outcome to allow the identification of suitable measurement instruments. Further validation is recommended for use with a wide range of communities and to achieve standardised measurement. Public Library of Science 2020-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7592842/ /pubmed/33112874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240518 Text en © 2020 Retzer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Retzer, Ameeta Sayers, Ruth Pinfold, Vanessa Gibson, John Keeley, Thomas Taylor, Gemma Plappert, Humera Gibbons, Bliss Huxley, Peter Mathers, Jonathan Birchwood, Maximillian Calvert, Melanie Development of a core outcome set for use in community-based bipolar trials—A qualitative study and modified Delphi |
title | Development of a core outcome set for use in community-based bipolar trials—A qualitative study and modified Delphi |
title_full | Development of a core outcome set for use in community-based bipolar trials—A qualitative study and modified Delphi |
title_fullStr | Development of a core outcome set for use in community-based bipolar trials—A qualitative study and modified Delphi |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a core outcome set for use in community-based bipolar trials—A qualitative study and modified Delphi |
title_short | Development of a core outcome set for use in community-based bipolar trials—A qualitative study and modified Delphi |
title_sort | development of a core outcome set for use in community-based bipolar trials—a qualitative study and modified delphi |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7592842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33112874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240518 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT retzerameeta developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseincommunitybasedbipolartrialsaqualitativestudyandmodifieddelphi AT sayersruth developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseincommunitybasedbipolartrialsaqualitativestudyandmodifieddelphi AT pinfoldvanessa developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseincommunitybasedbipolartrialsaqualitativestudyandmodifieddelphi AT gibsonjohn developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseincommunitybasedbipolartrialsaqualitativestudyandmodifieddelphi AT keeleythomas developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseincommunitybasedbipolartrialsaqualitativestudyandmodifieddelphi AT taylorgemma developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseincommunitybasedbipolartrialsaqualitativestudyandmodifieddelphi AT plapperthumera developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseincommunitybasedbipolartrialsaqualitativestudyandmodifieddelphi AT gibbonsbliss developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseincommunitybasedbipolartrialsaqualitativestudyandmodifieddelphi AT huxleypeter developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseincommunitybasedbipolartrialsaqualitativestudyandmodifieddelphi AT mathersjonathan developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseincommunitybasedbipolartrialsaqualitativestudyandmodifieddelphi AT birchwoodmaximillian developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseincommunitybasedbipolartrialsaqualitativestudyandmodifieddelphi AT calvertmelanie developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseincommunitybasedbipolartrialsaqualitativestudyandmodifieddelphi |