Cargando…

Development of a core outcome set for use in community-based bipolar trials—A qualitative study and modified Delphi

BACKGROUND: A core outcome set (COS) is a standardised collection of outcomes to be collected and reported in all trials within a research area. A COS can reduce reporting bias and facilitate evidence synthesis. This is currently unavailable for use in community-based bipolar trials. This research a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Retzer, Ameeta, Sayers, Ruth, Pinfold, Vanessa, Gibson, John, Keeley, Thomas, Taylor, Gemma, Plappert, Humera, Gibbons, Bliss, Huxley, Peter, Mathers, Jonathan, Birchwood, Maximillian, Calvert, Melanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7592842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33112874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240518
_version_ 1783601261948436480
author Retzer, Ameeta
Sayers, Ruth
Pinfold, Vanessa
Gibson, John
Keeley, Thomas
Taylor, Gemma
Plappert, Humera
Gibbons, Bliss
Huxley, Peter
Mathers, Jonathan
Birchwood, Maximillian
Calvert, Melanie
author_facet Retzer, Ameeta
Sayers, Ruth
Pinfold, Vanessa
Gibson, John
Keeley, Thomas
Taylor, Gemma
Plappert, Humera
Gibbons, Bliss
Huxley, Peter
Mathers, Jonathan
Birchwood, Maximillian
Calvert, Melanie
author_sort Retzer, Ameeta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A core outcome set (COS) is a standardised collection of outcomes to be collected and reported in all trials within a research area. A COS can reduce reporting bias and facilitate evidence synthesis. This is currently unavailable for use in community-based bipolar trials. This research aimed to develop such a COS, with input from a full range of stakeholders. METHODS: A co-production approach was used throughout. A longlist of outcomes was derived from focus groups with people with a bipolar diagnosis and carers, interviews with healthcare professionals and a rapid review of outcomes listed in bipolar trials on the Cochrane database. An expert panel with personal and/or professional experience of bipolar participated in a modified Delphi process and the COS was finalised at a consensus meeting. RESULTS: Fifty participants rated the importance of each outcome. Sixty-six outcomes were included in Round 1 of the questionnaire; 13 outcomes were added by Round 1 participants and were rated in Round 2. Seventy-six percent of participants (n = 38) returned to Round 2 and 60 outcomes, including 4 outcomes added by participants in Round 1, received a rating of 7–9 by >70% and 1–3 by <25% of the sample. Fourteen participants finalised a COS containing 11 outcomes at the consensus meeting: personal recovery; connectedness; clinical recovery of bipolar symptoms; mental health and wellbeing; physical health; self-monitoring and management; medication effects; quality of life; service outcomes; experience of care; and use of coercion. CONCLUSIONS: This COS is recommended for use in community-based bipolar trials to ensure stakeholder-relevant outcomes, facilitate data synthesis, and transparent reporting. The COS includes guidance notes for each outcome to allow the identification of suitable measurement instruments. Further validation is recommended for use with a wide range of communities and to achieve standardised measurement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7592842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75928422020-11-02 Development of a core outcome set for use in community-based bipolar trials—A qualitative study and modified Delphi Retzer, Ameeta Sayers, Ruth Pinfold, Vanessa Gibson, John Keeley, Thomas Taylor, Gemma Plappert, Humera Gibbons, Bliss Huxley, Peter Mathers, Jonathan Birchwood, Maximillian Calvert, Melanie PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: A core outcome set (COS) is a standardised collection of outcomes to be collected and reported in all trials within a research area. A COS can reduce reporting bias and facilitate evidence synthesis. This is currently unavailable for use in community-based bipolar trials. This research aimed to develop such a COS, with input from a full range of stakeholders. METHODS: A co-production approach was used throughout. A longlist of outcomes was derived from focus groups with people with a bipolar diagnosis and carers, interviews with healthcare professionals and a rapid review of outcomes listed in bipolar trials on the Cochrane database. An expert panel with personal and/or professional experience of bipolar participated in a modified Delphi process and the COS was finalised at a consensus meeting. RESULTS: Fifty participants rated the importance of each outcome. Sixty-six outcomes were included in Round 1 of the questionnaire; 13 outcomes were added by Round 1 participants and were rated in Round 2. Seventy-six percent of participants (n = 38) returned to Round 2 and 60 outcomes, including 4 outcomes added by participants in Round 1, received a rating of 7–9 by >70% and 1–3 by <25% of the sample. Fourteen participants finalised a COS containing 11 outcomes at the consensus meeting: personal recovery; connectedness; clinical recovery of bipolar symptoms; mental health and wellbeing; physical health; self-monitoring and management; medication effects; quality of life; service outcomes; experience of care; and use of coercion. CONCLUSIONS: This COS is recommended for use in community-based bipolar trials to ensure stakeholder-relevant outcomes, facilitate data synthesis, and transparent reporting. The COS includes guidance notes for each outcome to allow the identification of suitable measurement instruments. Further validation is recommended for use with a wide range of communities and to achieve standardised measurement. Public Library of Science 2020-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7592842/ /pubmed/33112874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240518 Text en © 2020 Retzer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Retzer, Ameeta
Sayers, Ruth
Pinfold, Vanessa
Gibson, John
Keeley, Thomas
Taylor, Gemma
Plappert, Humera
Gibbons, Bliss
Huxley, Peter
Mathers, Jonathan
Birchwood, Maximillian
Calvert, Melanie
Development of a core outcome set for use in community-based bipolar trials—A qualitative study and modified Delphi
title Development of a core outcome set for use in community-based bipolar trials—A qualitative study and modified Delphi
title_full Development of a core outcome set for use in community-based bipolar trials—A qualitative study and modified Delphi
title_fullStr Development of a core outcome set for use in community-based bipolar trials—A qualitative study and modified Delphi
title_full_unstemmed Development of a core outcome set for use in community-based bipolar trials—A qualitative study and modified Delphi
title_short Development of a core outcome set for use in community-based bipolar trials—A qualitative study and modified Delphi
title_sort development of a core outcome set for use in community-based bipolar trials—a qualitative study and modified delphi
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7592842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33112874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240518
work_keys_str_mv AT retzerameeta developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseincommunitybasedbipolartrialsaqualitativestudyandmodifieddelphi
AT sayersruth developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseincommunitybasedbipolartrialsaqualitativestudyandmodifieddelphi
AT pinfoldvanessa developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseincommunitybasedbipolartrialsaqualitativestudyandmodifieddelphi
AT gibsonjohn developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseincommunitybasedbipolartrialsaqualitativestudyandmodifieddelphi
AT keeleythomas developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseincommunitybasedbipolartrialsaqualitativestudyandmodifieddelphi
AT taylorgemma developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseincommunitybasedbipolartrialsaqualitativestudyandmodifieddelphi
AT plapperthumera developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseincommunitybasedbipolartrialsaqualitativestudyandmodifieddelphi
AT gibbonsbliss developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseincommunitybasedbipolartrialsaqualitativestudyandmodifieddelphi
AT huxleypeter developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseincommunitybasedbipolartrialsaqualitativestudyandmodifieddelphi
AT mathersjonathan developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseincommunitybasedbipolartrialsaqualitativestudyandmodifieddelphi
AT birchwoodmaximillian developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseincommunitybasedbipolartrialsaqualitativestudyandmodifieddelphi
AT calvertmelanie developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseincommunitybasedbipolartrialsaqualitativestudyandmodifieddelphi