Cargando…

Direct tumor visual feedback during free breathing in 0.35T MRgRT

To present a tumor motion control system during free breathing using direct tumor visual feedback to patients in 0.35 T magnetic resonance‐guided radiotherapy (MRgRT). We present direct tumor visualization to patients by projecting real‐time cine MR images on an MR‐compatible display system inside a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Taeho, Lewis, Benjamin C., Price, Alex, Mazur, Thomas, Gach, H. Michael, Park, Justin C., Cai, Bin, Wittland, Erin, Henke, Lauren, Kim, Hyun, Mutic, Sasa, Green, Olga
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7592976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32931649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13016
_version_ 1783601280112918528
author Kim, Taeho
Lewis, Benjamin C.
Price, Alex
Mazur, Thomas
Gach, H. Michael
Park, Justin C.
Cai, Bin
Wittland, Erin
Henke, Lauren
Kim, Hyun
Mutic, Sasa
Green, Olga
author_facet Kim, Taeho
Lewis, Benjamin C.
Price, Alex
Mazur, Thomas
Gach, H. Michael
Park, Justin C.
Cai, Bin
Wittland, Erin
Henke, Lauren
Kim, Hyun
Mutic, Sasa
Green, Olga
author_sort Kim, Taeho
collection PubMed
description To present a tumor motion control system during free breathing using direct tumor visual feedback to patients in 0.35 T magnetic resonance‐guided radiotherapy (MRgRT). We present direct tumor visualization to patients by projecting real‐time cine MR images on an MR‐compatible display system inside a 0.35 T MRgRT bore. The direct tumor visualization included anatomical images with a target contour and an auto‐segmented gating contour. In addition, a beam‐status sign was added for patient guidance. The feasibility was investigated with a six‐patient clinical evaluation of the system in terms of tumor motion range and beam‐on time. Seven patients without visual guidance were used for comparison. Positions of the tumor and the auto‐segmented gating contour from the cine MR images were used in probability analysis to evaluate tumor motion control. In addition, beam‐on time was recorded to assess the efficacy of the visual feedback system. The direct tumor visualization system was developed and implemented in our clinic. The target contour extended 3 mm outside of the gating contour for 33.6 ± 24.9% of the time without visual guidance, and 37.2 ± 26.4% of the time with visual guidance. The average maximum motion outside of the gating contour was 14.4 ± 11.1 mm without and 13.0 ± 7.9 mm with visual guidance. Beam‐on time as a percentage was 43.9 ± 15.3% without visual guidance, and 48.0 ± 21.2% with visual guidance, but was not significantly different (P = 0.34). We demonstrated the clinical feasibility and potential benefits of presenting direct tumor visual feedback to patients in MRgRT. The visual feedback allows patients to visualize and attempt to minimize tumor motion in free breathing. The proposed system and associated clinical workflow can be easily adapted for any type of MRgRT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7592976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75929762020-11-02 Direct tumor visual feedback during free breathing in 0.35T MRgRT Kim, Taeho Lewis, Benjamin C. Price, Alex Mazur, Thomas Gach, H. Michael Park, Justin C. Cai, Bin Wittland, Erin Henke, Lauren Kim, Hyun Mutic, Sasa Green, Olga J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes To present a tumor motion control system during free breathing using direct tumor visual feedback to patients in 0.35 T magnetic resonance‐guided radiotherapy (MRgRT). We present direct tumor visualization to patients by projecting real‐time cine MR images on an MR‐compatible display system inside a 0.35 T MRgRT bore. The direct tumor visualization included anatomical images with a target contour and an auto‐segmented gating contour. In addition, a beam‐status sign was added for patient guidance. The feasibility was investigated with a six‐patient clinical evaluation of the system in terms of tumor motion range and beam‐on time. Seven patients without visual guidance were used for comparison. Positions of the tumor and the auto‐segmented gating contour from the cine MR images were used in probability analysis to evaluate tumor motion control. In addition, beam‐on time was recorded to assess the efficacy of the visual feedback system. The direct tumor visualization system was developed and implemented in our clinic. The target contour extended 3 mm outside of the gating contour for 33.6 ± 24.9% of the time without visual guidance, and 37.2 ± 26.4% of the time with visual guidance. The average maximum motion outside of the gating contour was 14.4 ± 11.1 mm without and 13.0 ± 7.9 mm with visual guidance. Beam‐on time as a percentage was 43.9 ± 15.3% without visual guidance, and 48.0 ± 21.2% with visual guidance, but was not significantly different (P = 0.34). We demonstrated the clinical feasibility and potential benefits of presenting direct tumor visual feedback to patients in MRgRT. The visual feedback allows patients to visualize and attempt to minimize tumor motion in free breathing. The proposed system and associated clinical workflow can be easily adapted for any type of MRgRT. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7592976/ /pubmed/32931649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13016 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Kim, Taeho
Lewis, Benjamin C.
Price, Alex
Mazur, Thomas
Gach, H. Michael
Park, Justin C.
Cai, Bin
Wittland, Erin
Henke, Lauren
Kim, Hyun
Mutic, Sasa
Green, Olga
Direct tumor visual feedback during free breathing in 0.35T MRgRT
title Direct tumor visual feedback during free breathing in 0.35T MRgRT
title_full Direct tumor visual feedback during free breathing in 0.35T MRgRT
title_fullStr Direct tumor visual feedback during free breathing in 0.35T MRgRT
title_full_unstemmed Direct tumor visual feedback during free breathing in 0.35T MRgRT
title_short Direct tumor visual feedback during free breathing in 0.35T MRgRT
title_sort direct tumor visual feedback during free breathing in 0.35t mrgrt
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7592976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32931649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13016
work_keys_str_mv AT kimtaeho directtumorvisualfeedbackduringfreebreathingin035tmrgrt
AT lewisbenjaminc directtumorvisualfeedbackduringfreebreathingin035tmrgrt
AT pricealex directtumorvisualfeedbackduringfreebreathingin035tmrgrt
AT mazurthomas directtumorvisualfeedbackduringfreebreathingin035tmrgrt
AT gachhmichael directtumorvisualfeedbackduringfreebreathingin035tmrgrt
AT parkjustinc directtumorvisualfeedbackduringfreebreathingin035tmrgrt
AT caibin directtumorvisualfeedbackduringfreebreathingin035tmrgrt
AT wittlanderin directtumorvisualfeedbackduringfreebreathingin035tmrgrt
AT henkelauren directtumorvisualfeedbackduringfreebreathingin035tmrgrt
AT kimhyun directtumorvisualfeedbackduringfreebreathingin035tmrgrt
AT muticsasa directtumorvisualfeedbackduringfreebreathingin035tmrgrt
AT greenolga directtumorvisualfeedbackduringfreebreathingin035tmrgrt