Cargando…

Comparison of VMAT complexity‐reduction strategies for single‐target cranial radiosurgery with the Eclipse treatment planning system

Complexity in MLC‐based radiosurgery treatment delivery can be characterized by the efficiency of monitor unit (MU) utilization and the average MLC leaf separation distance for a treatment plan. A reduction in plan complexity may be desirable if plan quality is not impacted. In this study, a number...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lobb, Eric C., Degnan, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7592979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32920991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13014
_version_ 1783601280800784384
author Lobb, Eric C.
Degnan, Michael
author_facet Lobb, Eric C.
Degnan, Michael
author_sort Lobb, Eric C.
collection PubMed
description Complexity in MLC‐based radiosurgery treatment delivery can be characterized by the efficiency of monitor unit (MU) utilization and the average MLC leaf separation distance for a treatment plan. A reduction in plan complexity may be desirable if plan quality is not impacted. In this study, a number of strategies are explored to determine how plan quality is affected by efforts to reduce plan complexity. Ten radiosurgery cases of varying complexity are retrospectively planned using six optimization strategies: an unconstrained volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique, a MU‐constrained VMAT technique, three techniques using various strengths of the aperture shape controller (ASC), and a hybrid technique consisting of a final‐stage VMAT optimization applied to a dynamic conformal arc leaf sequence (ODCA). The plans are compared in terms of MU efficiency, MLC leaf‐separation, conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), and QA measurement results. The five VMAT techniques exhibited only minor differences in CI and GI values, though the ASC and MU‐constrained techniques did require 6–20% fewer MU and had mean field apertures 5–19% larger. On average, the ODCA technique had CI values 3.5% lower and GI values 1.0–2.5% higher than the VMAT techniques, but also had a mean field aperture 24–47% larger and required 16–32% fewer MU. The QA measurement results showed a 0.61% variation in mean per‐field 2%/1 mm gamma passing rates across all techniques (range 96.81%–97.42%), with no observed correlation between passing rate and technique. For simple targets, the ODCA technique achieved CI results that were equivalent to the unconstrained VMAT technique with an average 30% reduction in required MU, an average 50% increase in mean leaf separation distance, and brain V12(Gy) values within 0.38 cc of the VMAT technique for targets up to approximately 2 cm diameter. For MLC‐based single‐target radiosurgery, plan complexity can often be significantly reduced without an equivalent reduction in plan quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7592979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75929792020-11-02 Comparison of VMAT complexity‐reduction strategies for single‐target cranial radiosurgery with the Eclipse treatment planning system Lobb, Eric C. Degnan, Michael J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Complexity in MLC‐based radiosurgery treatment delivery can be characterized by the efficiency of monitor unit (MU) utilization and the average MLC leaf separation distance for a treatment plan. A reduction in plan complexity may be desirable if plan quality is not impacted. In this study, a number of strategies are explored to determine how plan quality is affected by efforts to reduce plan complexity. Ten radiosurgery cases of varying complexity are retrospectively planned using six optimization strategies: an unconstrained volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique, a MU‐constrained VMAT technique, three techniques using various strengths of the aperture shape controller (ASC), and a hybrid technique consisting of a final‐stage VMAT optimization applied to a dynamic conformal arc leaf sequence (ODCA). The plans are compared in terms of MU efficiency, MLC leaf‐separation, conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), and QA measurement results. The five VMAT techniques exhibited only minor differences in CI and GI values, though the ASC and MU‐constrained techniques did require 6–20% fewer MU and had mean field apertures 5–19% larger. On average, the ODCA technique had CI values 3.5% lower and GI values 1.0–2.5% higher than the VMAT techniques, but also had a mean field aperture 24–47% larger and required 16–32% fewer MU. The QA measurement results showed a 0.61% variation in mean per‐field 2%/1 mm gamma passing rates across all techniques (range 96.81%–97.42%), with no observed correlation between passing rate and technique. For simple targets, the ODCA technique achieved CI results that were equivalent to the unconstrained VMAT technique with an average 30% reduction in required MU, an average 50% increase in mean leaf separation distance, and brain V12(Gy) values within 0.38 cc of the VMAT technique for targets up to approximately 2 cm diameter. For MLC‐based single‐target radiosurgery, plan complexity can often be significantly reduced without an equivalent reduction in plan quality. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7592979/ /pubmed/32920991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13014 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Lobb, Eric C.
Degnan, Michael
Comparison of VMAT complexity‐reduction strategies for single‐target cranial radiosurgery with the Eclipse treatment planning system
title Comparison of VMAT complexity‐reduction strategies for single‐target cranial radiosurgery with the Eclipse treatment planning system
title_full Comparison of VMAT complexity‐reduction strategies for single‐target cranial radiosurgery with the Eclipse treatment planning system
title_fullStr Comparison of VMAT complexity‐reduction strategies for single‐target cranial radiosurgery with the Eclipse treatment planning system
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of VMAT complexity‐reduction strategies for single‐target cranial radiosurgery with the Eclipse treatment planning system
title_short Comparison of VMAT complexity‐reduction strategies for single‐target cranial radiosurgery with the Eclipse treatment planning system
title_sort comparison of vmat complexity‐reduction strategies for single‐target cranial radiosurgery with the eclipse treatment planning system
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7592979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32920991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13014
work_keys_str_mv AT lobbericc comparisonofvmatcomplexityreductionstrategiesforsingletargetcranialradiosurgerywiththeeclipsetreatmentplanningsystem
AT degnanmichael comparisonofvmatcomplexityreductionstrategiesforsingletargetcranialradiosurgerywiththeeclipsetreatmentplanningsystem