Cargando…

Guipi decoction for coronary heart disease: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Guipi Decoction (GPD) is a classical traditional Chinese medication used to treat CHD. However, systematic review and meta-analysis regarding its efficacy and safety has not been systematically evalua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Huanjia, Liu, Shiyu, Cai, Hairong, Chen, Dongjie, Fu, Xue, Zhao, Shuai, Chen, Bojun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7593082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32769912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021589
_version_ 1783601304948441088
author Gao, Huanjia
Liu, Shiyu
Cai, Hairong
Chen, Dongjie
Fu, Xue
Zhao, Shuai
Chen, Bojun
author_facet Gao, Huanjia
Liu, Shiyu
Cai, Hairong
Chen, Dongjie
Fu, Xue
Zhao, Shuai
Chen, Bojun
author_sort Gao, Huanjia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Guipi Decoction (GPD) is a classical traditional Chinese medication used to treat CHD. However, systematic review and meta-analysis regarding its efficacy and safety has not been systematically evaluated. The objective of this protocol is to determine the efficacy and safety of GPD in the treatment of CHD. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness and safety of GPD in the treatment of CHD will be retrieved from 8 electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, VIP Database, Wanfang Database and China Biology Medicine Database. Study selection, data collection, risk of bias assessment, and evaluation of the quality of evidence will be performed in order. Data will be analyzed by RevMan V.5.3.5 software. RESULTS: This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of GPD in the treatment of CHD. CONCLUSION: This systematic review will provide evidence for determining whether or not GPD is an effective and safe intervention for CHD. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD 42020156420.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7593082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75930822020-10-29 Guipi decoction for coronary heart disease: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis Gao, Huanjia Liu, Shiyu Cai, Hairong Chen, Dongjie Fu, Xue Zhao, Shuai Chen, Bojun Medicine (Baltimore) 3800 BACKGROUND: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Guipi Decoction (GPD) is a classical traditional Chinese medication used to treat CHD. However, systematic review and meta-analysis regarding its efficacy and safety has not been systematically evaluated. The objective of this protocol is to determine the efficacy and safety of GPD in the treatment of CHD. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness and safety of GPD in the treatment of CHD will be retrieved from 8 electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, VIP Database, Wanfang Database and China Biology Medicine Database. Study selection, data collection, risk of bias assessment, and evaluation of the quality of evidence will be performed in order. Data will be analyzed by RevMan V.5.3.5 software. RESULTS: This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of GPD in the treatment of CHD. CONCLUSION: This systematic review will provide evidence for determining whether or not GPD is an effective and safe intervention for CHD. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD 42020156420. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7593082/ /pubmed/32769912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021589 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 3800
Gao, Huanjia
Liu, Shiyu
Cai, Hairong
Chen, Dongjie
Fu, Xue
Zhao, Shuai
Chen, Bojun
Guipi decoction for coronary heart disease: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Guipi decoction for coronary heart disease: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Guipi decoction for coronary heart disease: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Guipi decoction for coronary heart disease: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Guipi decoction for coronary heart disease: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Guipi decoction for coronary heart disease: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort guipi decoction for coronary heart disease: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 3800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7593082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32769912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021589
work_keys_str_mv AT gaohuanjia guipidecoctionforcoronaryheartdiseaseaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liushiyu guipidecoctionforcoronaryheartdiseaseaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT caihairong guipidecoctionforcoronaryheartdiseaseaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chendongjie guipidecoctionforcoronaryheartdiseaseaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fuxue guipidecoctionforcoronaryheartdiseaseaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaoshuai guipidecoctionforcoronaryheartdiseaseaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenbojun guipidecoctionforcoronaryheartdiseaseaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis