Cargando…

Faunal input at host plants: Can camel thorn trees use nutrients imported by resident sociable weavers?

“Islands of fertility” result from the focussing of water and nutrients around many shrub or tree species due to plants foraging for resources. Plant–animal feedbacks may amplify the development of such islands through environmental modification due to, for example, faunal deposition of nutrients an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prayag, Kervin D., du Toit, Carla J., Cramer, Michael D., Thomson, Robert L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7593193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33144990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6798
_version_ 1783601329803886592
author Prayag, Kervin D.
du Toit, Carla J.
Cramer, Michael D.
Thomson, Robert L.
author_facet Prayag, Kervin D.
du Toit, Carla J.
Cramer, Michael D.
Thomson, Robert L.
author_sort Prayag, Kervin D.
collection PubMed
description “Islands of fertility” result from the focussing of water and nutrients around many shrub or tree species due to plants foraging for resources. Plant–animal feedbacks may amplify the development of such islands through environmental modification due to, for example, faunal deposition of nutrients and seeds. Fauna residing within vegetation clumps are likely to exert stronger feedbacks on their hosts than itinerant species. We studied the interaction between camel thorn trees (Vachellia erioloba) and the colonial nests of sociable weavers (Philetairus socius) in the Kalahari. We hypothesized that the accumulation of biological material below the nests will alter the nutrient status of the soil beneath the nest trees, in relation to unoccupied trees and the surrounding grassland. We also suggested that this association will have both positive and negative effects on the camel thorn trees. We found that soil concentrations of N, P, and K were, respectively, 4, 4.6, and 1.2 times higher below trees with nests compared to control trees, indicating faunal concentration of nutrients. Soil δ(15)N values were higher below trees with nests than below control trees without nests. Foliar δ(15)N values were also higher in nest trees than in control trees, showing the trees accessed faunally derived N. Furthermore, foliar biomass per diameter of terminal branches was 27% higher in nest trees, suggesting that trees respond to nutrient input from the weavers with increased growth. Large barren areas in the subcanopy vegetation directly beneath the colonies were attributed to decreased water infiltration rates, as a result of accumulation of organic matter due to continuous deposition of feces, possibly limiting competitive species from establishing in the subcanopy. On the other hand, canopy volume was reduced in trees with nests due to nests occupying large volumes within the canopy, and nests frequently causing branch fall, indicating costs associated with hosting weaver colonies. Synthesis: We found nutritional benefits to camel thorn trees when hosting sociable weaver colonies. These benefits can potentially overcome important environmental constraints, but these are partially offset by the resulting costs to the host trees.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7593193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75931932020-11-02 Faunal input at host plants: Can camel thorn trees use nutrients imported by resident sociable weavers? Prayag, Kervin D. du Toit, Carla J. Cramer, Michael D. Thomson, Robert L. Ecol Evol Original Research “Islands of fertility” result from the focussing of water and nutrients around many shrub or tree species due to plants foraging for resources. Plant–animal feedbacks may amplify the development of such islands through environmental modification due to, for example, faunal deposition of nutrients and seeds. Fauna residing within vegetation clumps are likely to exert stronger feedbacks on their hosts than itinerant species. We studied the interaction between camel thorn trees (Vachellia erioloba) and the colonial nests of sociable weavers (Philetairus socius) in the Kalahari. We hypothesized that the accumulation of biological material below the nests will alter the nutrient status of the soil beneath the nest trees, in relation to unoccupied trees and the surrounding grassland. We also suggested that this association will have both positive and negative effects on the camel thorn trees. We found that soil concentrations of N, P, and K were, respectively, 4, 4.6, and 1.2 times higher below trees with nests compared to control trees, indicating faunal concentration of nutrients. Soil δ(15)N values were higher below trees with nests than below control trees without nests. Foliar δ(15)N values were also higher in nest trees than in control trees, showing the trees accessed faunally derived N. Furthermore, foliar biomass per diameter of terminal branches was 27% higher in nest trees, suggesting that trees respond to nutrient input from the weavers with increased growth. Large barren areas in the subcanopy vegetation directly beneath the colonies were attributed to decreased water infiltration rates, as a result of accumulation of organic matter due to continuous deposition of feces, possibly limiting competitive species from establishing in the subcanopy. On the other hand, canopy volume was reduced in trees with nests due to nests occupying large volumes within the canopy, and nests frequently causing branch fall, indicating costs associated with hosting weaver colonies. Synthesis: We found nutritional benefits to camel thorn trees when hosting sociable weaver colonies. These benefits can potentially overcome important environmental constraints, but these are partially offset by the resulting costs to the host trees. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7593193/ /pubmed/33144990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6798 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Prayag, Kervin D.
du Toit, Carla J.
Cramer, Michael D.
Thomson, Robert L.
Faunal input at host plants: Can camel thorn trees use nutrients imported by resident sociable weavers?
title Faunal input at host plants: Can camel thorn trees use nutrients imported by resident sociable weavers?
title_full Faunal input at host plants: Can camel thorn trees use nutrients imported by resident sociable weavers?
title_fullStr Faunal input at host plants: Can camel thorn trees use nutrients imported by resident sociable weavers?
title_full_unstemmed Faunal input at host plants: Can camel thorn trees use nutrients imported by resident sociable weavers?
title_short Faunal input at host plants: Can camel thorn trees use nutrients imported by resident sociable weavers?
title_sort faunal input at host plants: can camel thorn trees use nutrients imported by resident sociable weavers?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7593193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33144990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6798
work_keys_str_mv AT prayagkervind faunalinputathostplantscancamelthorntreesusenutrientsimportedbyresidentsociableweavers
AT dutoitcarlaj faunalinputathostplantscancamelthorntreesusenutrientsimportedbyresidentsociableweavers
AT cramermichaeld faunalinputathostplantscancamelthorntreesusenutrientsimportedbyresidentsociableweavers
AT thomsonrobertl faunalinputathostplantscancamelthorntreesusenutrientsimportedbyresidentsociableweavers