Cargando…

Feasibility and safety of fertility-sparing surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer with dense adhesion: a long-term result from a single institution

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the feasibility and safety of fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with dense adhesions. METHODS: Patients were divided into cases with and without dense adhesions in this retrospective study. RESULTS: Of the 95 eligible patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baek, Min-Hyun, Park, Jeong-Yeol, Kim, Dae-Yeon, Suh, Dae-Shik, Kim, Jong-Hyeok, Kim, Yong-Man, Kim, Young-Tak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7593218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33078594
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e85
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: We investigated the feasibility and safety of fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with dense adhesions. METHODS: Patients were divided into cases with and without dense adhesions in this retrospective study. RESULTS: Of the 95 eligible patients, 29 patients had dense adhesions. Mean age, proportion of staging procedure, distribution of histologic type, and co-presence of endometriosis were different (p=0.003, 0.033, 0.011, and 0.011, respectively). The median follow-up period was 57.8 (0.4–230.0) months. There were no differences in the rates of recurrence (21.2% vs. 20.7%, p=1.000) or death (16.7% vs. 6.9%, p=0.332) between the 2 groups. There was no difference in the pattern of recurrence or in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between the 2 groups. In multivariate analysis, pretreatment cancer antigen-125 >35 U/mL and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IC were significant factors of worse DFS and OS, while dense adhesion was not a prognostic factor for both DFS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.3–2.7; p=0.792) and OS (HR=0.2; 95% CI=0.1–1.8; p=0.142), nor were age, proportion of staging procedure, histologic type, and co-presence of endometriosis. Moreover, the distribution of those 2 significant prognostic factors was not different between the 2 groups. Dense adhesions were subgrouped into non-tumor and tumor associated dense adhesions for further analysis and the results were same. CONCLUSION: FSS is feasible and safe in EOC, regardless of the presence of dense adhesions.