Cargando…

Laparoscopic removal of a giant middle ureteral stone: A case report and review of literature

Giant ureteral calculi stones defined as larger than 5 cm in length or circumference. Although many giant ureteral stones have been reported, the laparoscopic removal of these stones is rare. A 45-year-old male patient presented to our clinic with right flank pain and discomfort from 6 months ago. A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yasseri, Alimohammad Fakhr, Seyed Esmaili, Seyed Naser, Asadi, Mahboobe, Mohammad kazem Aghamir, Seyed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7593261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33145021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.10.026
_version_ 1783601345721270272
author Yasseri, Alimohammad Fakhr
Seyed Esmaili, Seyed Naser
Asadi, Mahboobe
Mohammad kazem Aghamir, Seyed
author_facet Yasseri, Alimohammad Fakhr
Seyed Esmaili, Seyed Naser
Asadi, Mahboobe
Mohammad kazem Aghamir, Seyed
author_sort Yasseri, Alimohammad Fakhr
collection PubMed
description Giant ureteral calculi stones defined as larger than 5 cm in length or circumference. Although many giant ureteral stones have been reported, the laparoscopic removal of these stones is rare. A 45-year-old male patient presented to our clinic with right flank pain and discomfort from 6 months ago. Abdominopelvic computed tomographic scan showed a giant left middle ureteral stone. On the first stage laparoscopic ureter lithotomy was performed with 3 ports and the stone was extracted from 12 mm port successfully. We used transperitoneal laparoscopic approach in the full lateral decubitus position. three trocars were placed: one camera 11-mm port was placed at the level of the umbilicus on the lateral border of the rectus muscle, a 5-mm port was placed in the midline below the umbilicus, and a 12-mm port was at the superior border of the rectus muscle. The extracted stone size was 6.5*1.7 cm with 33 gm in weight. Due to the advantages of laparoscopic ureter lithotomy in giant ureteral stones and its feasibility to perform in a single session, we could suggest this minimally invasive treatment as a first choice in this group of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7593261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75932612020-11-02 Laparoscopic removal of a giant middle ureteral stone: A case report and review of literature Yasseri, Alimohammad Fakhr Seyed Esmaili, Seyed Naser Asadi, Mahboobe Mohammad kazem Aghamir, Seyed Ann Med Surg (Lond) Case Report Giant ureteral calculi stones defined as larger than 5 cm in length or circumference. Although many giant ureteral stones have been reported, the laparoscopic removal of these stones is rare. A 45-year-old male patient presented to our clinic with right flank pain and discomfort from 6 months ago. Abdominopelvic computed tomographic scan showed a giant left middle ureteral stone. On the first stage laparoscopic ureter lithotomy was performed with 3 ports and the stone was extracted from 12 mm port successfully. We used transperitoneal laparoscopic approach in the full lateral decubitus position. three trocars were placed: one camera 11-mm port was placed at the level of the umbilicus on the lateral border of the rectus muscle, a 5-mm port was placed in the midline below the umbilicus, and a 12-mm port was at the superior border of the rectus muscle. The extracted stone size was 6.5*1.7 cm with 33 gm in weight. Due to the advantages of laparoscopic ureter lithotomy in giant ureteral stones and its feasibility to perform in a single session, we could suggest this minimally invasive treatment as a first choice in this group of patients. Elsevier 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7593261/ /pubmed/33145021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.10.026 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
Yasseri, Alimohammad Fakhr
Seyed Esmaili, Seyed Naser
Asadi, Mahboobe
Mohammad kazem Aghamir, Seyed
Laparoscopic removal of a giant middle ureteral stone: A case report and review of literature
title Laparoscopic removal of a giant middle ureteral stone: A case report and review of literature
title_full Laparoscopic removal of a giant middle ureteral stone: A case report and review of literature
title_fullStr Laparoscopic removal of a giant middle ureteral stone: A case report and review of literature
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic removal of a giant middle ureteral stone: A case report and review of literature
title_short Laparoscopic removal of a giant middle ureteral stone: A case report and review of literature
title_sort laparoscopic removal of a giant middle ureteral stone: a case report and review of literature
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7593261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33145021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.10.026
work_keys_str_mv AT yasserialimohammadfakhr laparoscopicremovalofagiantmiddleureteralstoneacasereportandreviewofliterature
AT seyedesmailiseyednaser laparoscopicremovalofagiantmiddleureteralstoneacasereportandreviewofliterature
AT asadimahboobe laparoscopicremovalofagiantmiddleureteralstoneacasereportandreviewofliterature
AT mohammadkazemaghamirseyed laparoscopicremovalofagiantmiddleureteralstoneacasereportandreviewofliterature