Cargando…

User experiences on implementation of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a Haematological outpatient clinic

BACKGROUND: PROMs can help healthcare professionals gain an improved understanding of patients’ physical burdens, functional levels, and (health-related) quality of life throughout disease and medical treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the barriers and potential opportunities PROMs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thestrup Hansen, Stine, Kjerholt, Mette, Friis Christensen, Sarah, Brodersen, John, Hølge-Hazelton, Bibi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7593370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33113030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00256-z
_version_ 1783601367702568960
author Thestrup Hansen, Stine
Kjerholt, Mette
Friis Christensen, Sarah
Brodersen, John
Hølge-Hazelton, Bibi
author_facet Thestrup Hansen, Stine
Kjerholt, Mette
Friis Christensen, Sarah
Brodersen, John
Hølge-Hazelton, Bibi
author_sort Thestrup Hansen, Stine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: PROMs can help healthcare professionals gain an improved understanding of patients’ physical burdens, functional levels, and (health-related) quality of life throughout disease and medical treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the barriers and potential opportunities PROMs may present in a haematological outpatient clinic from three different perspectives: patients, nurses and haematologists. METHODS: The present study synthesizes three previously published studies that separately explored the experiences of patients, nurses and haematologists when implementing PROMs. The studies were all guided by the qualitative methodology Interpretive Description, including a focused ethnographic approach, to develop implications for future practice. RESULTS: The overall themes that emerged from the analysis were “Structural similarities influence the adoption of PROMs” and “Different perspectives on the potential of PROMs.” CONCLUSION: Across the different user groups in the haematological outpatient clinic, the use of PROMs was thwarted due to an unquestioned commitment to biomedical knowledge and the system’s rationality and norms: PROM data was not used in patient consultations. Nurses and haematologists expressed different preferences related to potential future PROMs and different objectives for PROMs in clinical practice. From the different perspectives of the patients, nurses and haematologists, PROMs were not compatible with clinical practice. Further research is recommended to develop PROMs validated for use in haematological outpatient clinics. Moreover, implementation strategies adjusted to the structural barriers of the system are crucial. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s41687-020-00256-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7593370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75933702020-10-30 User experiences on implementation of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a Haematological outpatient clinic Thestrup Hansen, Stine Kjerholt, Mette Friis Christensen, Sarah Brodersen, John Hølge-Hazelton, Bibi J Patient Rep Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: PROMs can help healthcare professionals gain an improved understanding of patients’ physical burdens, functional levels, and (health-related) quality of life throughout disease and medical treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the barriers and potential opportunities PROMs may present in a haematological outpatient clinic from three different perspectives: patients, nurses and haematologists. METHODS: The present study synthesizes three previously published studies that separately explored the experiences of patients, nurses and haematologists when implementing PROMs. The studies were all guided by the qualitative methodology Interpretive Description, including a focused ethnographic approach, to develop implications for future practice. RESULTS: The overall themes that emerged from the analysis were “Structural similarities influence the adoption of PROMs” and “Different perspectives on the potential of PROMs.” CONCLUSION: Across the different user groups in the haematological outpatient clinic, the use of PROMs was thwarted due to an unquestioned commitment to biomedical knowledge and the system’s rationality and norms: PROM data was not used in patient consultations. Nurses and haematologists expressed different preferences related to potential future PROMs and different objectives for PROMs in clinical practice. From the different perspectives of the patients, nurses and haematologists, PROMs were not compatible with clinical practice. Further research is recommended to develop PROMs validated for use in haematological outpatient clinics. Moreover, implementation strategies adjusted to the structural barriers of the system are crucial. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s41687-020-00256-z. Springer International Publishing 2020-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7593370/ /pubmed/33113030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00256-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Thestrup Hansen, Stine
Kjerholt, Mette
Friis Christensen, Sarah
Brodersen, John
Hølge-Hazelton, Bibi
User experiences on implementation of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a Haematological outpatient clinic
title User experiences on implementation of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a Haematological outpatient clinic
title_full User experiences on implementation of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a Haematological outpatient clinic
title_fullStr User experiences on implementation of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a Haematological outpatient clinic
title_full_unstemmed User experiences on implementation of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a Haematological outpatient clinic
title_short User experiences on implementation of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a Haematological outpatient clinic
title_sort user experiences on implementation of patient reported outcome measures (proms) in a haematological outpatient clinic
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7593370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33113030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00256-z
work_keys_str_mv AT thestruphansenstine userexperiencesonimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsinahaematologicaloutpatientclinic
AT kjerholtmette userexperiencesonimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsinahaematologicaloutpatientclinic
AT friischristensensarah userexperiencesonimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsinahaematologicaloutpatientclinic
AT brodersenjohn userexperiencesonimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsinahaematologicaloutpatientclinic
AT hølgehazeltonbibi userexperiencesonimplementationofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsinahaematologicaloutpatientclinic