Cargando…
Independent effects of statistical learning and top-down attention
It is well known that spatial attention can be directed in a top-down way to task-relevant locations in space. In addition, through visual statistical learning (VSL), attention can be biased towards relevant (target) locations and away from irrelevant (distractor) locations. The present study invest...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7593392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32909086 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02115-x |
_version_ | 1783601372768239616 |
---|---|
author | Gao, Ya Theeuwes, Jan |
author_facet | Gao, Ya Theeuwes, Jan |
author_sort | Gao, Ya |
collection | PubMed |
description | It is well known that spatial attention can be directed in a top-down way to task-relevant locations in space. In addition, through visual statistical learning (VSL), attention can be biased towards relevant (target) locations and away from irrelevant (distractor) locations. The present study investigates the interaction between the explicit task-relevant, top-down attention and the lingering attentional biases due to VSL. We wanted to determine the contribution of each of these two processes to attentional selection. In the current study, participants performed a search task while keeping a location in spatial working memory. In Experiment 1, the target appeared more often in one location, and appeared less often in other location. In Experiment 2, a color singleton distractor was presented more often in location than in all other locations. The results show that when the search target matched the location that was kept in working memory, participants were much faster at responding to the search target than when it did not match, signifying top-down attentional selection. Independent of this top-down effect, we found a clear effect of VSL as responses were even faster when target (Experiment 1) or the distractor (Experiment 2) was presented at a more likely location in visual field. We conclude that attentional selection is driven by implicit biases due to statistical learning and by explicit top-down processing, each process individually and independently modulating the neural activity within the spatial priority map. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7593392 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75933922020-11-10 Independent effects of statistical learning and top-down attention Gao, Ya Theeuwes, Jan Atten Percept Psychophys Article It is well known that spatial attention can be directed in a top-down way to task-relevant locations in space. In addition, through visual statistical learning (VSL), attention can be biased towards relevant (target) locations and away from irrelevant (distractor) locations. The present study investigates the interaction between the explicit task-relevant, top-down attention and the lingering attentional biases due to VSL. We wanted to determine the contribution of each of these two processes to attentional selection. In the current study, participants performed a search task while keeping a location in spatial working memory. In Experiment 1, the target appeared more often in one location, and appeared less often in other location. In Experiment 2, a color singleton distractor was presented more often in location than in all other locations. The results show that when the search target matched the location that was kept in working memory, participants were much faster at responding to the search target than when it did not match, signifying top-down attentional selection. Independent of this top-down effect, we found a clear effect of VSL as responses were even faster when target (Experiment 1) or the distractor (Experiment 2) was presented at a more likely location in visual field. We conclude that attentional selection is driven by implicit biases due to statistical learning and by explicit top-down processing, each process individually and independently modulating the neural activity within the spatial priority map. Springer US 2020-09-09 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7593392/ /pubmed/32909086 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02115-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Gao, Ya Theeuwes, Jan Independent effects of statistical learning and top-down attention |
title | Independent effects of statistical learning and top-down attention |
title_full | Independent effects of statistical learning and top-down attention |
title_fullStr | Independent effects of statistical learning and top-down attention |
title_full_unstemmed | Independent effects of statistical learning and top-down attention |
title_short | Independent effects of statistical learning and top-down attention |
title_sort | independent effects of statistical learning and top-down attention |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7593392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32909086 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02115-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gaoya independenteffectsofstatisticallearningandtopdownattention AT theeuwesjan independenteffectsofstatisticallearningandtopdownattention |