Cargando…

Scalp Topography of Lower Urinary Tract Sensory Evoked Potentials

Impaired lower urinary tract (LUT) afferents often cause LUT symptoms. Assessment of LUT afferent pathways is possible using bipolar cortical sensory evoked potential (SEP) recordings with the active electrode at the vertex during electrical stimulation in the LUT. This study aimed to investigate th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Lely, Stéphanie, Kessler, Thomas M., Mehnert, Ulrich, Liechti, Martina D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7593393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33067692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-020-00796-z
_version_ 1783601372996829184
author van der Lely, Stéphanie
Kessler, Thomas M.
Mehnert, Ulrich
Liechti, Martina D.
author_facet van der Lely, Stéphanie
Kessler, Thomas M.
Mehnert, Ulrich
Liechti, Martina D.
author_sort van der Lely, Stéphanie
collection PubMed
description Impaired lower urinary tract (LUT) afferents often cause LUT symptoms. Assessment of LUT afferent pathways is possible using bipolar cortical sensory evoked potential (SEP) recordings with the active electrode at the vertex during electrical stimulation in the LUT. This study aimed to investigate the topographical distribution and microstates of lower urinary tract sensory evoked potentials (LUTSEPs) using different stimulation frequencies. Ninety healthy subjects (18–36 years old, 40 women) were randomly assigned to one of five stimulation locations [bladder dome; trigone; proximal, membranous (men only) or distal urethra]. Cycles of 0.5 Hz/1.1 Hz/1.6 Hz electrical stimulation were applied using a custom-made catheter. Cortical activity was recorded from 64 surface electrodes. Marker setting was performed manually on an individual subject-level for the P1, N1, and P2 components of vertex recordings. N1 and P2 topographies presented with central negativities and positivities around the vertex. Regarding topographical distribution, Randomization Graphical User interface (RAGU) analyses revealed consistent frequency effects and microstates for N1/P2. Higher stimulation frequencies resulted in decreasing map strength for P1, N1, and P2. LUTSEP topographies suggest central generators in the somatosensory cortex, which are not detectable in a bipolar set-up. The observed frequency effect indicates fiber refractoriness at higher frequencies. The multichannel approach allows more comprehensive assessment of LUTSEPs and might therefore be sensitive to pathological changes. Examinations in patients with LUT symptoms are needed to further investigate this biomarker. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10548-020-00796-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7593393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75933932020-11-10 Scalp Topography of Lower Urinary Tract Sensory Evoked Potentials van der Lely, Stéphanie Kessler, Thomas M. Mehnert, Ulrich Liechti, Martina D. Brain Topogr Original Paper Impaired lower urinary tract (LUT) afferents often cause LUT symptoms. Assessment of LUT afferent pathways is possible using bipolar cortical sensory evoked potential (SEP) recordings with the active electrode at the vertex during electrical stimulation in the LUT. This study aimed to investigate the topographical distribution and microstates of lower urinary tract sensory evoked potentials (LUTSEPs) using different stimulation frequencies. Ninety healthy subjects (18–36 years old, 40 women) were randomly assigned to one of five stimulation locations [bladder dome; trigone; proximal, membranous (men only) or distal urethra]. Cycles of 0.5 Hz/1.1 Hz/1.6 Hz electrical stimulation were applied using a custom-made catheter. Cortical activity was recorded from 64 surface electrodes. Marker setting was performed manually on an individual subject-level for the P1, N1, and P2 components of vertex recordings. N1 and P2 topographies presented with central negativities and positivities around the vertex. Regarding topographical distribution, Randomization Graphical User interface (RAGU) analyses revealed consistent frequency effects and microstates for N1/P2. Higher stimulation frequencies resulted in decreasing map strength for P1, N1, and P2. LUTSEP topographies suggest central generators in the somatosensory cortex, which are not detectable in a bipolar set-up. The observed frequency effect indicates fiber refractoriness at higher frequencies. The multichannel approach allows more comprehensive assessment of LUTSEPs and might therefore be sensitive to pathological changes. Examinations in patients with LUT symptoms are needed to further investigate this biomarker. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10548-020-00796-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-10-16 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7593393/ /pubmed/33067692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-020-00796-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Paper
van der Lely, Stéphanie
Kessler, Thomas M.
Mehnert, Ulrich
Liechti, Martina D.
Scalp Topography of Lower Urinary Tract Sensory Evoked Potentials
title Scalp Topography of Lower Urinary Tract Sensory Evoked Potentials
title_full Scalp Topography of Lower Urinary Tract Sensory Evoked Potentials
title_fullStr Scalp Topography of Lower Urinary Tract Sensory Evoked Potentials
title_full_unstemmed Scalp Topography of Lower Urinary Tract Sensory Evoked Potentials
title_short Scalp Topography of Lower Urinary Tract Sensory Evoked Potentials
title_sort scalp topography of lower urinary tract sensory evoked potentials
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7593393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33067692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-020-00796-z
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderlelystephanie scalptopographyoflowerurinarytractsensoryevokedpotentials
AT kesslerthomasm scalptopographyoflowerurinarytractsensoryevokedpotentials
AT mehnertulrich scalptopographyoflowerurinarytractsensoryevokedpotentials
AT liechtimartinad scalptopographyoflowerurinarytractsensoryevokedpotentials