Cargando…
Emergency physicians in critical care: where are we now?
OBJECTIVE: Prior to 2011, emergency physicians who completed critical care (CC) fellowship were unable to obtain board certification in the United States. Three pathways for CC board certification have since been established. This study explores the training, practice, and perceived challenges of em...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7593427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33145559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12105 |
_version_ | 1783601380378804224 |
---|---|
author | Strickler, Samantha S. Choi, Daisi J. Singer, Daniel J. Oropello, John M. |
author_facet | Strickler, Samantha S. Choi, Daisi J. Singer, Daniel J. Oropello, John M. |
author_sort | Strickler, Samantha S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Prior to 2011, emergency physicians who completed critical care (CC) fellowship were unable to obtain board certification in the United States. Three pathways for CC board certification have since been established. This study explores the training, practice, and perceived challenges of emergency medicine/critical care fellows and emergency medicine/critical care physicians in the United States. METHODS: Anonymous institutional review board‐approved survey distributed via email through an online survey engine from April to December 2016. Participants were recruited through national organizations and independent interest groups. Emergency physicians who were in CC fellowship or had completed a CC fellowship and were in practice in the United States participated voluntarily. RESULTS: Of the 162 respondents, 152 were included (92 physicians, 60 fellows). Eighty‐nine percent ranged from 31–50 years old. Among fellows, 90% desired a dual discipline practice. Among physicians, 63% split their time between the emergency department and ICU. Seventy‐one percent of physicians reported working in academic institutions. Among physicians engaged in a dual practice, mean full‐time equivalent (±SD) devoted to the ED was 0.37 (±0.22), mean full‐time equivalent for ICU was 0.47 (±0.22), and mean full‐time equivalent for protected academic time was 0.28 (±0.19). Emergency medicine/critical care fellows and emergency medicine/critical care physicians identified numerous challenges associated with duality. CONCLUSIONS: Since the advent of critical care board certification for emergency physicians in the United States, there has been an increasing number of emergency physicians pursuing CC fellowships and achieving CC board certification. Emergency medicine/critical care physicians are venturing into a variety of practice models, demonstrating that the employment landscape remains plastic. Not unexpectedly, emergency medicine/critical care fellows and emergency medicine/critical care physicians are encountering challenges intrinsic to their duality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7593427 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75934272020-11-02 Emergency physicians in critical care: where are we now? Strickler, Samantha S. Choi, Daisi J. Singer, Daniel J. Oropello, John M. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open The Practice of Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVE: Prior to 2011, emergency physicians who completed critical care (CC) fellowship were unable to obtain board certification in the United States. Three pathways for CC board certification have since been established. This study explores the training, practice, and perceived challenges of emergency medicine/critical care fellows and emergency medicine/critical care physicians in the United States. METHODS: Anonymous institutional review board‐approved survey distributed via email through an online survey engine from April to December 2016. Participants were recruited through national organizations and independent interest groups. Emergency physicians who were in CC fellowship or had completed a CC fellowship and were in practice in the United States participated voluntarily. RESULTS: Of the 162 respondents, 152 were included (92 physicians, 60 fellows). Eighty‐nine percent ranged from 31–50 years old. Among fellows, 90% desired a dual discipline practice. Among physicians, 63% split their time between the emergency department and ICU. Seventy‐one percent of physicians reported working in academic institutions. Among physicians engaged in a dual practice, mean full‐time equivalent (±SD) devoted to the ED was 0.37 (±0.22), mean full‐time equivalent for ICU was 0.47 (±0.22), and mean full‐time equivalent for protected academic time was 0.28 (±0.19). Emergency medicine/critical care fellows and emergency medicine/critical care physicians identified numerous challenges associated with duality. CONCLUSIONS: Since the advent of critical care board certification for emergency physicians in the United States, there has been an increasing number of emergency physicians pursuing CC fellowships and achieving CC board certification. Emergency medicine/critical care physicians are venturing into a variety of practice models, demonstrating that the employment landscape remains plastic. Not unexpectedly, emergency medicine/critical care fellows and emergency medicine/critical care physicians are encountering challenges intrinsic to their duality. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7593427/ /pubmed/33145559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12105 Text en © 2020 The Authors. JACEP Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American College of Emergency Physicians. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | The Practice of Emergency Medicine Strickler, Samantha S. Choi, Daisi J. Singer, Daniel J. Oropello, John M. Emergency physicians in critical care: where are we now? |
title | Emergency physicians in critical care: where are we now? |
title_full | Emergency physicians in critical care: where are we now? |
title_fullStr | Emergency physicians in critical care: where are we now? |
title_full_unstemmed | Emergency physicians in critical care: where are we now? |
title_short | Emergency physicians in critical care: where are we now? |
title_sort | emergency physicians in critical care: where are we now? |
topic | The Practice of Emergency Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7593427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33145559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stricklersamanthas emergencyphysiciansincriticalcarewherearewenow AT choidaisij emergencyphysiciansincriticalcarewherearewenow AT singerdanielj emergencyphysiciansincriticalcarewherearewenow AT oropellojohnm emergencyphysiciansincriticalcarewherearewenow |