Cargando…

Can QuickBrain MRI replace CT as first‐line imaging for select pediatric head trauma?

OBJECTIVE: The current standard of care for initial neuroimaging in injured pediatric patients suspected of having traumatic brain injury is computed tomography (CT) that carries risks associated with radiation exposure. The primary objective of this trial was to evaluate the ability of a QuickBrain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheridan, David C., Pettersson, David, Newgard, Craig D., Selden, Nathan R., Jafri, Mubeen A., Lin, Amber, Rowell, Susan, Hansen, Matthew L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7593443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33145547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12113
_version_ 1783601383906213888
author Sheridan, David C.
Pettersson, David
Newgard, Craig D.
Selden, Nathan R.
Jafri, Mubeen A.
Lin, Amber
Rowell, Susan
Hansen, Matthew L.
author_facet Sheridan, David C.
Pettersson, David
Newgard, Craig D.
Selden, Nathan R.
Jafri, Mubeen A.
Lin, Amber
Rowell, Susan
Hansen, Matthew L.
author_sort Sheridan, David C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The current standard of care for initial neuroimaging in injured pediatric patients suspected of having traumatic brain injury is computed tomography (CT) that carries risks associated with radiation exposure. The primary objective of this trial was to evaluate the ability of a QuickBrain MRI (qbMRI) protocol to detect clinically important traumatic brain injuries in the emergency department (ED). The secondary objective of this trial was to compare qbMRI to CT in identifying radiographic traumatic brain injury. METHODS: This was a prospective study of trauma patients less than 15 years of age with suspected traumatic brain injury at a level 1 pediatric trauma center in Portland, Oregon between August 2017 and March 2019. All patients in whom a head CT was deemed clinically necessary were approached for enrollment to also obtain a qbMRI in the acute setting. Clinically important traumatic brain injury was defined as the need for neurological surgery procedure, intubation, pediatric intensive care unit stay greater than 24 hours, a total hospital length of stay greater than 48 hours, or death. RESULTS: A total of 73 patients underwent both CT and qbMRI. The median age was 4 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 1–10 years). Twenty‐two patients (30%) of patients had a clinically important traumatic brain injury, and of those, there were 2 deaths (9.1%). QbMRI acquisition time had a median of 4 minutes and 52 seconds (IQR = 3 minutes 49 seconds–5 minutes 47 seconds). QbMRI had sensitivity for detecting clinically important traumatic brain injury of 95% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 77%–99%). For any radiographic injury, qbMRI had a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI = 78%–94%). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that qbMRI has good sensitivity to detect clinically important traumatic brain injuries. Further multi‐institutional, prospective trials are warranted to either support or refute these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7593443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75934432020-11-02 Can QuickBrain MRI replace CT as first‐line imaging for select pediatric head trauma? Sheridan, David C. Pettersson, David Newgard, Craig D. Selden, Nathan R. Jafri, Mubeen A. Lin, Amber Rowell, Susan Hansen, Matthew L. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Pediatrics OBJECTIVE: The current standard of care for initial neuroimaging in injured pediatric patients suspected of having traumatic brain injury is computed tomography (CT) that carries risks associated with radiation exposure. The primary objective of this trial was to evaluate the ability of a QuickBrain MRI (qbMRI) protocol to detect clinically important traumatic brain injuries in the emergency department (ED). The secondary objective of this trial was to compare qbMRI to CT in identifying radiographic traumatic brain injury. METHODS: This was a prospective study of trauma patients less than 15 years of age with suspected traumatic brain injury at a level 1 pediatric trauma center in Portland, Oregon between August 2017 and March 2019. All patients in whom a head CT was deemed clinically necessary were approached for enrollment to also obtain a qbMRI in the acute setting. Clinically important traumatic brain injury was defined as the need for neurological surgery procedure, intubation, pediatric intensive care unit stay greater than 24 hours, a total hospital length of stay greater than 48 hours, or death. RESULTS: A total of 73 patients underwent both CT and qbMRI. The median age was 4 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 1–10 years). Twenty‐two patients (30%) of patients had a clinically important traumatic brain injury, and of those, there were 2 deaths (9.1%). QbMRI acquisition time had a median of 4 minutes and 52 seconds (IQR = 3 minutes 49 seconds–5 minutes 47 seconds). QbMRI had sensitivity for detecting clinically important traumatic brain injury of 95% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 77%–99%). For any radiographic injury, qbMRI had a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI = 78%–94%). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that qbMRI has good sensitivity to detect clinically important traumatic brain injuries. Further multi‐institutional, prospective trials are warranted to either support or refute these findings. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7593443/ /pubmed/33145547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12113 Text en © 2020 The Authors. JACEP Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American College of Emergency Physicians. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Sheridan, David C.
Pettersson, David
Newgard, Craig D.
Selden, Nathan R.
Jafri, Mubeen A.
Lin, Amber
Rowell, Susan
Hansen, Matthew L.
Can QuickBrain MRI replace CT as first‐line imaging for select pediatric head trauma?
title Can QuickBrain MRI replace CT as first‐line imaging for select pediatric head trauma?
title_full Can QuickBrain MRI replace CT as first‐line imaging for select pediatric head trauma?
title_fullStr Can QuickBrain MRI replace CT as first‐line imaging for select pediatric head trauma?
title_full_unstemmed Can QuickBrain MRI replace CT as first‐line imaging for select pediatric head trauma?
title_short Can QuickBrain MRI replace CT as first‐line imaging for select pediatric head trauma?
title_sort can quickbrain mri replace ct as first‐line imaging for select pediatric head trauma?
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7593443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33145547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12113
work_keys_str_mv AT sheridandavidc canquickbrainmrireplacectasfirstlineimagingforselectpediatricheadtrauma
AT petterssondavid canquickbrainmrireplacectasfirstlineimagingforselectpediatricheadtrauma
AT newgardcraigd canquickbrainmrireplacectasfirstlineimagingforselectpediatricheadtrauma
AT seldennathanr canquickbrainmrireplacectasfirstlineimagingforselectpediatricheadtrauma
AT jafrimubeena canquickbrainmrireplacectasfirstlineimagingforselectpediatricheadtrauma
AT linamber canquickbrainmrireplacectasfirstlineimagingforselectpediatricheadtrauma
AT rowellsusan canquickbrainmrireplacectasfirstlineimagingforselectpediatricheadtrauma
AT hansenmatthewl canquickbrainmrireplacectasfirstlineimagingforselectpediatricheadtrauma