Cargando…

Improving reporting of meta‐ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance

AIMS: The aim of this study was to provide guidance to improve the completeness and clarity of meta‐ethnography reporting. BACKGROUND: Evidence‐based policy and practice require robust evidence syntheses which can further understanding of people's experiences and associated social processes. Me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: France, Emma F., Cunningham, Maggie, Ring, Nicola, Uny, Isabelle, Duncan, Edward AS, Jepson, Ruth G, Maxwell, Margaret, Roberts, Rachel J., Turley, Ruth L., Booth, Andrew, Britten, Nicky, Flemming, Kate, Gallagher, Ian, Garside, Ruth, Hannes, Karin, Lewin, Simon, Noblit, George W., Pope, Catherine, Thomas, James, Vanstone, Meredith, Higginbottom, Gina M. A., Noyes, Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7594209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30644123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.13809
_version_ 1783601579561058304
author France, Emma F.
Cunningham, Maggie
Ring, Nicola
Uny, Isabelle
Duncan, Edward AS
Jepson, Ruth G
Maxwell, Margaret
Roberts, Rachel J.
Turley, Ruth L.
Booth, Andrew
Britten, Nicky
Flemming, Kate
Gallagher, Ian
Garside, Ruth
Hannes, Karin
Lewin, Simon
Noblit, George W.
Pope, Catherine
Thomas, James
Vanstone, Meredith
Higginbottom, Gina M. A.
Noyes, Jane
author_facet France, Emma F.
Cunningham, Maggie
Ring, Nicola
Uny, Isabelle
Duncan, Edward AS
Jepson, Ruth G
Maxwell, Margaret
Roberts, Rachel J.
Turley, Ruth L.
Booth, Andrew
Britten, Nicky
Flemming, Kate
Gallagher, Ian
Garside, Ruth
Hannes, Karin
Lewin, Simon
Noblit, George W.
Pope, Catherine
Thomas, James
Vanstone, Meredith
Higginbottom, Gina M. A.
Noyes, Jane
author_sort France, Emma F.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The aim of this study was to provide guidance to improve the completeness and clarity of meta‐ethnography reporting. BACKGROUND: Evidence‐based policy and practice require robust evidence syntheses which can further understanding of people's experiences and associated social processes. Meta‐ethnography is a rigorous seven‐phase qualitative evidence synthesis methodology, developed by Noblit and Hare. Meta‐ethnography is used widely in health research, but reporting is often poor quality and this discourages trust in and use of its findings. Meta‐ethnography reporting guidance is needed to improve reporting quality. DESIGN: The eMERGe study used a rigorous mixed‐methods design and evidence‐based methods to develop the novel reporting guidance and explanatory notes. METHODS: The study, conducted from 2015 ‐ 2017, comprised of: (1) a methodological systematic review of guidance for meta‐ethnography conduct and reporting; (2) a review and audit of published meta‐ethnographies to identify good practice principles; (3) international, multidisciplinary consensus‐building processes to agree guidance content; (4) innovative development of the guidance and explanatory notes. FINDINGS: Recommendations and good practice for all seven phases of meta‐ethnography conduct and reporting were newly identified leading to 19 reporting criteria and accompanying detailed guidance. CONCLUSION: The bespoke eMERGe Reporting Guidance, which incorporates new methodological developments and advances the methodology, can help researchers to report the important aspects of meta‐ethnography. Use of the guidance should raise reporting quality. Better reporting could make assessments of confidence in the findings more robust and increase use of meta‐ethnography outputs to improve practice, policy, and service user outcomes in health and other fields. This is the first tailored reporting guideline for meta‐ethnography. This article is being simultaneously published in the following journals: Journal of Advanced Nursing, Psycho‐oncology, Review of Education, and BMC Medical Research Methodology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7594209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75942092020-11-02 Improving reporting of meta‐ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance France, Emma F. Cunningham, Maggie Ring, Nicola Uny, Isabelle Duncan, Edward AS Jepson, Ruth G Maxwell, Margaret Roberts, Rachel J. Turley, Ruth L. Booth, Andrew Britten, Nicky Flemming, Kate Gallagher, Ian Garside, Ruth Hannes, Karin Lewin, Simon Noblit, George W. Pope, Catherine Thomas, James Vanstone, Meredith Higginbottom, Gina M. A. Noyes, Jane J Adv Nurs Research Papers AIMS: The aim of this study was to provide guidance to improve the completeness and clarity of meta‐ethnography reporting. BACKGROUND: Evidence‐based policy and practice require robust evidence syntheses which can further understanding of people's experiences and associated social processes. Meta‐ethnography is a rigorous seven‐phase qualitative evidence synthesis methodology, developed by Noblit and Hare. Meta‐ethnography is used widely in health research, but reporting is often poor quality and this discourages trust in and use of its findings. Meta‐ethnography reporting guidance is needed to improve reporting quality. DESIGN: The eMERGe study used a rigorous mixed‐methods design and evidence‐based methods to develop the novel reporting guidance and explanatory notes. METHODS: The study, conducted from 2015 ‐ 2017, comprised of: (1) a methodological systematic review of guidance for meta‐ethnography conduct and reporting; (2) a review and audit of published meta‐ethnographies to identify good practice principles; (3) international, multidisciplinary consensus‐building processes to agree guidance content; (4) innovative development of the guidance and explanatory notes. FINDINGS: Recommendations and good practice for all seven phases of meta‐ethnography conduct and reporting were newly identified leading to 19 reporting criteria and accompanying detailed guidance. CONCLUSION: The bespoke eMERGe Reporting Guidance, which incorporates new methodological developments and advances the methodology, can help researchers to report the important aspects of meta‐ethnography. Use of the guidance should raise reporting quality. Better reporting could make assessments of confidence in the findings more robust and increase use of meta‐ethnography outputs to improve practice, policy, and service user outcomes in health and other fields. This is the first tailored reporting guideline for meta‐ethnography. This article is being simultaneously published in the following journals: Journal of Advanced Nursing, Psycho‐oncology, Review of Education, and BMC Medical Research Methodology. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-15 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7594209/ /pubmed/30644123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.13809 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Advanced Nursing Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Papers
France, Emma F.
Cunningham, Maggie
Ring, Nicola
Uny, Isabelle
Duncan, Edward AS
Jepson, Ruth G
Maxwell, Margaret
Roberts, Rachel J.
Turley, Ruth L.
Booth, Andrew
Britten, Nicky
Flemming, Kate
Gallagher, Ian
Garside, Ruth
Hannes, Karin
Lewin, Simon
Noblit, George W.
Pope, Catherine
Thomas, James
Vanstone, Meredith
Higginbottom, Gina M. A.
Noyes, Jane
Improving reporting of meta‐ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance
title Improving reporting of meta‐ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance
title_full Improving reporting of meta‐ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance
title_fullStr Improving reporting of meta‐ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance
title_full_unstemmed Improving reporting of meta‐ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance
title_short Improving reporting of meta‐ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance
title_sort improving reporting of meta‐ethnography: the emerge reporting guidance
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7594209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30644123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.13809
work_keys_str_mv AT franceemmaf improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT cunninghammaggie improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT ringnicola improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT unyisabelle improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT duncanedwardas improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT jepsonruthg improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT maxwellmargaret improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT robertsrachelj improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT turleyruthl improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT boothandrew improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT brittennicky improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT flemmingkate improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT gallagherian improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT garsideruth improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT hanneskarin improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT lewinsimon improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT noblitgeorgew improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT popecatherine improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT thomasjames improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT vanstonemeredith improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT higginbottomginama improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance
AT noyesjane improvingreportingofmetaethnographytheemergereportingguidance