Cargando…

External validation and clinical usefulness of three commonly used cardiovascular risk prediction scores in an Emirati population: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study

OBJECTIVES: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction models are useful tools for identifying those at high risk of cardiovascular events in a population. No studies have evaluated the performance of such risk models in an Arab population. Therefore, in this study, the accuracy and clinical usefu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Shamsi, Saif, Govender, Romona Devi, King, Jeffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7594351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33115904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040680
_version_ 1783601619217154048
author Al-Shamsi, Saif
Govender, Romona Devi
King, Jeffrey
author_facet Al-Shamsi, Saif
Govender, Romona Devi
King, Jeffrey
author_sort Al-Shamsi, Saif
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction models are useful tools for identifying those at high risk of cardiovascular events in a population. No studies have evaluated the performance of such risk models in an Arab population. Therefore, in this study, the accuracy and clinical usefulness of two commonly used Framingham-based risk models and the 2013 Pooled Cohort Risk Equation (PCE) were assessed in a United Arab Emirates (UAE) national population. DESIGN: A 10-year retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Outpatient clinics at a tertiary care hospital, Al-Ain, UAE. PARTICIPANTS: The study cohort included 1041 UAE nationals aged 30–79 who had no history of CVD at baseline. Patients were followed until 31 December 2019. Eligible patients were grouped into the PCE and the Framingham validation cohorts. EXPOSURE: The 10-year predicted risk for CVD for each patient was calculated using the 2008 Framingham risk model, the 2008 office-based Framingham risk model, and the 2013 PCE model. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: The discrimination, calibration and clinical usefulness of the three models for predicting 10-year cardiovascular risk were assessed. RESULTS: In women, the 2013 PCE model showed marginally better discrimination (C-statistic: 0.77) than the 2008 Framingham models (C-statistic: 0.74–0.75), whereas all three models showed moderate discrimination in men (C-statistic: 0.69‒0.70). All three models overestimated CVD risk in both men and women, with higher levels of predicted risk. The 2008 Framingham risk model (high-risk threshold of 20%) classified only 46% of women who subsequently developed incident CVD within 10 years as high risk. The 2013 PCE risk model (high-risk threshold of 7.5%) classified 74% of men who did not develop a cardiovascular event as high risk. CONCLUSIONS: None of the three models is accurate for predicting cardiovascular risk in UAE nationals. The performance of the models could potentially be improved by recalibration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7594351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75943512020-11-10 External validation and clinical usefulness of three commonly used cardiovascular risk prediction scores in an Emirati population: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study Al-Shamsi, Saif Govender, Romona Devi King, Jeffrey BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVES: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction models are useful tools for identifying those at high risk of cardiovascular events in a population. No studies have evaluated the performance of such risk models in an Arab population. Therefore, in this study, the accuracy and clinical usefulness of two commonly used Framingham-based risk models and the 2013 Pooled Cohort Risk Equation (PCE) were assessed in a United Arab Emirates (UAE) national population. DESIGN: A 10-year retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Outpatient clinics at a tertiary care hospital, Al-Ain, UAE. PARTICIPANTS: The study cohort included 1041 UAE nationals aged 30–79 who had no history of CVD at baseline. Patients were followed until 31 December 2019. Eligible patients were grouped into the PCE and the Framingham validation cohorts. EXPOSURE: The 10-year predicted risk for CVD for each patient was calculated using the 2008 Framingham risk model, the 2008 office-based Framingham risk model, and the 2013 PCE model. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: The discrimination, calibration and clinical usefulness of the three models for predicting 10-year cardiovascular risk were assessed. RESULTS: In women, the 2013 PCE model showed marginally better discrimination (C-statistic: 0.77) than the 2008 Framingham models (C-statistic: 0.74–0.75), whereas all three models showed moderate discrimination in men (C-statistic: 0.69‒0.70). All three models overestimated CVD risk in both men and women, with higher levels of predicted risk. The 2008 Framingham risk model (high-risk threshold of 20%) classified only 46% of women who subsequently developed incident CVD within 10 years as high risk. The 2013 PCE risk model (high-risk threshold of 7.5%) classified 74% of men who did not develop a cardiovascular event as high risk. CONCLUSIONS: None of the three models is accurate for predicting cardiovascular risk in UAE nationals. The performance of the models could potentially be improved by recalibration. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7594351/ /pubmed/33115904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040680 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Al-Shamsi, Saif
Govender, Romona Devi
King, Jeffrey
External validation and clinical usefulness of three commonly used cardiovascular risk prediction scores in an Emirati population: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study
title External validation and clinical usefulness of three commonly used cardiovascular risk prediction scores in an Emirati population: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study
title_full External validation and clinical usefulness of three commonly used cardiovascular risk prediction scores in an Emirati population: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study
title_fullStr External validation and clinical usefulness of three commonly used cardiovascular risk prediction scores in an Emirati population: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study
title_full_unstemmed External validation and clinical usefulness of three commonly used cardiovascular risk prediction scores in an Emirati population: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study
title_short External validation and clinical usefulness of three commonly used cardiovascular risk prediction scores in an Emirati population: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study
title_sort external validation and clinical usefulness of three commonly used cardiovascular risk prediction scores in an emirati population: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7594351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33115904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040680
work_keys_str_mv AT alshamsisaif externalvalidationandclinicalusefulnessofthreecommonlyusedcardiovascularriskpredictionscoresinanemiratipopulationaretrospectivelongitudinalcohortstudy
AT govenderromonadevi externalvalidationandclinicalusefulnessofthreecommonlyusedcardiovascularriskpredictionscoresinanemiratipopulationaretrospectivelongitudinalcohortstudy
AT kingjeffrey externalvalidationandclinicalusefulnessofthreecommonlyusedcardiovascularriskpredictionscoresinanemiratipopulationaretrospectivelongitudinalcohortstudy