Cargando…

Conditionally positive: a qualitative study of public perceptions about using health data for artificial intelligence research

OBJECTIVES: Given widespread interest in applying artificial intelligence (AI) to health data to improve patient care and health system efficiency, there is a need to understand the perspectives of the general public regarding the use of health data in AI research. DESIGN: A qualitative study involv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCradden, Melissa D, Sarker, Tasmie, Paprica, P Alison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7594363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33115901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039798
_version_ 1783601623046553600
author McCradden, Melissa D
Sarker, Tasmie
Paprica, P Alison
author_facet McCradden, Melissa D
Sarker, Tasmie
Paprica, P Alison
author_sort McCradden, Melissa D
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Given widespread interest in applying artificial intelligence (AI) to health data to improve patient care and health system efficiency, there is a need to understand the perspectives of the general public regarding the use of health data in AI research. DESIGN: A qualitative study involving six focus groups with members of the public. Participants discussed their views about AI in general, then were asked to share their thoughts about three realistic health AI research scenarios. Data were analysed using qualitative description thematic analysis. SETTINGS: Two cities in Ontario, Canada: Sudbury (400 km north of Toronto) and Mississauga (part of the Greater Toronto Area). PARTICIPANTS: Forty-one purposively sampled members of the public (21M:20F, 25–65 years, median age 40). RESULTS: Participants had low levels of prior knowledge of AI and mixed, mostly negative, perceptions of AI in general. Most endorsed using data for health AI research when there is strong potential for public benefit, providing that concerns about privacy, commercial motives and other risks were addressed. Inductive thematic analysis identified AI-specific hopes (eg, potential for faster and more accurate analyses, ability to use more data), fears (eg, loss of human touch, skill depreciation from over-reliance on machines) and conditions (eg, human verification of computer-aided decisions, transparency). There were mixed views about whether data subject consent is required for health AI research, with most participants wanting to know if, how and by whom their data were used. Though it was not an objective of the study, realistic health AI scenarios were found to have an educational effect. CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding concerns and limited knowledge about AI in general, most members of the general public in six focus groups in Ontario, Canada perceived benefits from health AI and conditionally supported the use of health data for AI research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7594363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75943632020-11-10 Conditionally positive: a qualitative study of public perceptions about using health data for artificial intelligence research McCradden, Melissa D Sarker, Tasmie Paprica, P Alison BMJ Open Qualitative Research OBJECTIVES: Given widespread interest in applying artificial intelligence (AI) to health data to improve patient care and health system efficiency, there is a need to understand the perspectives of the general public regarding the use of health data in AI research. DESIGN: A qualitative study involving six focus groups with members of the public. Participants discussed their views about AI in general, then were asked to share their thoughts about three realistic health AI research scenarios. Data were analysed using qualitative description thematic analysis. SETTINGS: Two cities in Ontario, Canada: Sudbury (400 km north of Toronto) and Mississauga (part of the Greater Toronto Area). PARTICIPANTS: Forty-one purposively sampled members of the public (21M:20F, 25–65 years, median age 40). RESULTS: Participants had low levels of prior knowledge of AI and mixed, mostly negative, perceptions of AI in general. Most endorsed using data for health AI research when there is strong potential for public benefit, providing that concerns about privacy, commercial motives and other risks were addressed. Inductive thematic analysis identified AI-specific hopes (eg, potential for faster and more accurate analyses, ability to use more data), fears (eg, loss of human touch, skill depreciation from over-reliance on machines) and conditions (eg, human verification of computer-aided decisions, transparency). There were mixed views about whether data subject consent is required for health AI research, with most participants wanting to know if, how and by whom their data were used. Though it was not an objective of the study, realistic health AI scenarios were found to have an educational effect. CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding concerns and limited knowledge about AI in general, most members of the general public in six focus groups in Ontario, Canada perceived benefits from health AI and conditionally supported the use of health data for AI research. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7594363/ /pubmed/33115901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039798 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Qualitative Research
McCradden, Melissa D
Sarker, Tasmie
Paprica, P Alison
Conditionally positive: a qualitative study of public perceptions about using health data for artificial intelligence research
title Conditionally positive: a qualitative study of public perceptions about using health data for artificial intelligence research
title_full Conditionally positive: a qualitative study of public perceptions about using health data for artificial intelligence research
title_fullStr Conditionally positive: a qualitative study of public perceptions about using health data for artificial intelligence research
title_full_unstemmed Conditionally positive: a qualitative study of public perceptions about using health data for artificial intelligence research
title_short Conditionally positive: a qualitative study of public perceptions about using health data for artificial intelligence research
title_sort conditionally positive: a qualitative study of public perceptions about using health data for artificial intelligence research
topic Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7594363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33115901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039798
work_keys_str_mv AT mccraddenmelissad conditionallypositiveaqualitativestudyofpublicperceptionsaboutusinghealthdataforartificialintelligenceresearch
AT sarkertasmie conditionallypositiveaqualitativestudyofpublicperceptionsaboutusinghealthdataforartificialintelligenceresearch
AT papricapalison conditionallypositiveaqualitativestudyofpublicperceptionsaboutusinghealthdataforartificialintelligenceresearch