Cargando…
Use of digital periodontal data to compare periodontal treatment outcomes in a practice-based research network (PBRN): a proof of concept
BACKGROUND: Scientific studies in dentistry are mainly conducted at universities. However, most patients are treated in dental practices, which differ in many ways from treatment at the university. Through the establishment of practice-based research networks, however, it is also possible to examine...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7594469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33115466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01284-3 |
_version_ | 1783601645059309568 |
---|---|
author | Peikert, Stefanie Anna Mittelhamm, Felix Frisch, Eberhard Vach, Kirstin Ratka-Krüger, Petra Woelber, Johan Peter |
author_facet | Peikert, Stefanie Anna Mittelhamm, Felix Frisch, Eberhard Vach, Kirstin Ratka-Krüger, Petra Woelber, Johan Peter |
author_sort | Peikert, Stefanie Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Scientific studies in dentistry are mainly conducted at universities. However, most patients are treated in dental practices, which differ in many ways from treatment at the university. Through the establishment of practice-based research networks, however, it is also possible to examine studies in a real-world setting in dental practices. For this reason the aim of this non-interventional, observational study was to develop and evaluate a digital procedure to access, extract and analyse recorded clinical data in practices to assess periodontal treatment outcomes. METHODS: Participating periodontists were former or active postgraduate students of a master’s course in periodontics in Freiburg who routinely used a digital periodontal diagnostic program. All available stored periodontal patient charts were extracted, anonymized and digitally sent to the study centre. RESULTS: In this study, data were collected from 6301 patients from 9 different practices. Information such as probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), mobility, furcation and gingival attachment for 153,163 teeth at first visit were successfully transferred to the study centre. During the average observational period of 9.77 years, only 2.8% of all teeth were lost. The number of visits was significantly negatively correlated with BOP (p < 0.0001), and the number of BOP-positive sites was significantly correlated with deeper PDs (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The presented procedure was able to gather a large amount of practice-based periodontal data, and thus this study may support practice-based research networks. The data indicate that systematic and supportive periodontal therapy is successful on a practice-based level. Trial registration The study was internationally registered on 4 January 2017 in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS 00011448). https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00011448 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7594469 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75944692020-10-30 Use of digital periodontal data to compare periodontal treatment outcomes in a practice-based research network (PBRN): a proof of concept Peikert, Stefanie Anna Mittelhamm, Felix Frisch, Eberhard Vach, Kirstin Ratka-Krüger, Petra Woelber, Johan Peter BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Scientific studies in dentistry are mainly conducted at universities. However, most patients are treated in dental practices, which differ in many ways from treatment at the university. Through the establishment of practice-based research networks, however, it is also possible to examine studies in a real-world setting in dental practices. For this reason the aim of this non-interventional, observational study was to develop and evaluate a digital procedure to access, extract and analyse recorded clinical data in practices to assess periodontal treatment outcomes. METHODS: Participating periodontists were former or active postgraduate students of a master’s course in periodontics in Freiburg who routinely used a digital periodontal diagnostic program. All available stored periodontal patient charts were extracted, anonymized and digitally sent to the study centre. RESULTS: In this study, data were collected from 6301 patients from 9 different practices. Information such as probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), mobility, furcation and gingival attachment for 153,163 teeth at first visit were successfully transferred to the study centre. During the average observational period of 9.77 years, only 2.8% of all teeth were lost. The number of visits was significantly negatively correlated with BOP (p < 0.0001), and the number of BOP-positive sites was significantly correlated with deeper PDs (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The presented procedure was able to gather a large amount of practice-based periodontal data, and thus this study may support practice-based research networks. The data indicate that systematic and supportive periodontal therapy is successful on a practice-based level. Trial registration The study was internationally registered on 4 January 2017 in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS 00011448). https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00011448 BioMed Central 2020-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7594469/ /pubmed/33115466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01284-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Peikert, Stefanie Anna Mittelhamm, Felix Frisch, Eberhard Vach, Kirstin Ratka-Krüger, Petra Woelber, Johan Peter Use of digital periodontal data to compare periodontal treatment outcomes in a practice-based research network (PBRN): a proof of concept |
title | Use of digital periodontal data to compare periodontal treatment outcomes in a practice-based research network (PBRN): a proof of concept |
title_full | Use of digital periodontal data to compare periodontal treatment outcomes in a practice-based research network (PBRN): a proof of concept |
title_fullStr | Use of digital periodontal data to compare periodontal treatment outcomes in a practice-based research network (PBRN): a proof of concept |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of digital periodontal data to compare periodontal treatment outcomes in a practice-based research network (PBRN): a proof of concept |
title_short | Use of digital periodontal data to compare periodontal treatment outcomes in a practice-based research network (PBRN): a proof of concept |
title_sort | use of digital periodontal data to compare periodontal treatment outcomes in a practice-based research network (pbrn): a proof of concept |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7594469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33115466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01284-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peikertstefanieanna useofdigitalperiodontaldatatocompareperiodontaltreatmentoutcomesinapracticebasedresearchnetworkpbrnaproofofconcept AT mittelhammfelix useofdigitalperiodontaldatatocompareperiodontaltreatmentoutcomesinapracticebasedresearchnetworkpbrnaproofofconcept AT frischeberhard useofdigitalperiodontaldatatocompareperiodontaltreatmentoutcomesinapracticebasedresearchnetworkpbrnaproofofconcept AT vachkirstin useofdigitalperiodontaldatatocompareperiodontaltreatmentoutcomesinapracticebasedresearchnetworkpbrnaproofofconcept AT ratkakrugerpetra useofdigitalperiodontaldatatocompareperiodontaltreatmentoutcomesinapracticebasedresearchnetworkpbrnaproofofconcept AT woelberjohanpeter useofdigitalperiodontaldatatocompareperiodontaltreatmentoutcomesinapracticebasedresearchnetworkpbrnaproofofconcept |