Cargando…

Use of digital periodontal data to compare periodontal treatment outcomes in a practice-based research network (PBRN): a proof of concept

BACKGROUND: Scientific studies in dentistry are mainly conducted at universities. However, most patients are treated in dental practices, which differ in many ways from treatment at the university. Through the establishment of practice-based research networks, however, it is also possible to examine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peikert, Stefanie Anna, Mittelhamm, Felix, Frisch, Eberhard, Vach, Kirstin, Ratka-Krüger, Petra, Woelber, Johan Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7594469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33115466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01284-3
_version_ 1783601645059309568
author Peikert, Stefanie Anna
Mittelhamm, Felix
Frisch, Eberhard
Vach, Kirstin
Ratka-Krüger, Petra
Woelber, Johan Peter
author_facet Peikert, Stefanie Anna
Mittelhamm, Felix
Frisch, Eberhard
Vach, Kirstin
Ratka-Krüger, Petra
Woelber, Johan Peter
author_sort Peikert, Stefanie Anna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Scientific studies in dentistry are mainly conducted at universities. However, most patients are treated in dental practices, which differ in many ways from treatment at the university. Through the establishment of practice-based research networks, however, it is also possible to examine studies in a real-world setting in dental practices. For this reason the aim of this non-interventional, observational study was to develop and evaluate a digital procedure to access, extract and analyse recorded clinical data in practices to assess periodontal treatment outcomes. METHODS: Participating periodontists were former or active postgraduate students of a master’s course in periodontics in Freiburg who routinely used a digital periodontal diagnostic program. All available stored periodontal patient charts were extracted, anonymized and digitally sent to the study centre. RESULTS: In this study, data were collected from 6301 patients from 9 different practices. Information such as probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), mobility, furcation and gingival attachment for 153,163 teeth at first visit were successfully transferred to the study centre. During the average observational period of 9.77 years, only 2.8% of all teeth were lost. The number of visits was significantly negatively correlated with BOP (p < 0.0001), and the number of BOP-positive sites was significantly correlated with deeper PDs (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The presented procedure was able to gather a large amount of practice-based periodontal data, and thus this study may support practice-based research networks. The data indicate that systematic and supportive periodontal therapy is successful on a practice-based level. Trial registration The study was internationally registered on 4 January 2017 in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS 00011448). https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00011448
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7594469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75944692020-10-30 Use of digital periodontal data to compare periodontal treatment outcomes in a practice-based research network (PBRN): a proof of concept Peikert, Stefanie Anna Mittelhamm, Felix Frisch, Eberhard Vach, Kirstin Ratka-Krüger, Petra Woelber, Johan Peter BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Scientific studies in dentistry are mainly conducted at universities. However, most patients are treated in dental practices, which differ in many ways from treatment at the university. Through the establishment of practice-based research networks, however, it is also possible to examine studies in a real-world setting in dental practices. For this reason the aim of this non-interventional, observational study was to develop and evaluate a digital procedure to access, extract and analyse recorded clinical data in practices to assess periodontal treatment outcomes. METHODS: Participating periodontists were former or active postgraduate students of a master’s course in periodontics in Freiburg who routinely used a digital periodontal diagnostic program. All available stored periodontal patient charts were extracted, anonymized and digitally sent to the study centre. RESULTS: In this study, data were collected from 6301 patients from 9 different practices. Information such as probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), mobility, furcation and gingival attachment for 153,163 teeth at first visit were successfully transferred to the study centre. During the average observational period of 9.77 years, only 2.8% of all teeth were lost. The number of visits was significantly negatively correlated with BOP (p < 0.0001), and the number of BOP-positive sites was significantly correlated with deeper PDs (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The presented procedure was able to gather a large amount of practice-based periodontal data, and thus this study may support practice-based research networks. The data indicate that systematic and supportive periodontal therapy is successful on a practice-based level. Trial registration The study was internationally registered on 4 January 2017 in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS 00011448). https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00011448 BioMed Central 2020-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7594469/ /pubmed/33115466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01284-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Peikert, Stefanie Anna
Mittelhamm, Felix
Frisch, Eberhard
Vach, Kirstin
Ratka-Krüger, Petra
Woelber, Johan Peter
Use of digital periodontal data to compare periodontal treatment outcomes in a practice-based research network (PBRN): a proof of concept
title Use of digital periodontal data to compare periodontal treatment outcomes in a practice-based research network (PBRN): a proof of concept
title_full Use of digital periodontal data to compare periodontal treatment outcomes in a practice-based research network (PBRN): a proof of concept
title_fullStr Use of digital periodontal data to compare periodontal treatment outcomes in a practice-based research network (PBRN): a proof of concept
title_full_unstemmed Use of digital periodontal data to compare periodontal treatment outcomes in a practice-based research network (PBRN): a proof of concept
title_short Use of digital periodontal data to compare periodontal treatment outcomes in a practice-based research network (PBRN): a proof of concept
title_sort use of digital periodontal data to compare periodontal treatment outcomes in a practice-based research network (pbrn): a proof of concept
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7594469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33115466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01284-3
work_keys_str_mv AT peikertstefanieanna useofdigitalperiodontaldatatocompareperiodontaltreatmentoutcomesinapracticebasedresearchnetworkpbrnaproofofconcept
AT mittelhammfelix useofdigitalperiodontaldatatocompareperiodontaltreatmentoutcomesinapracticebasedresearchnetworkpbrnaproofofconcept
AT frischeberhard useofdigitalperiodontaldatatocompareperiodontaltreatmentoutcomesinapracticebasedresearchnetworkpbrnaproofofconcept
AT vachkirstin useofdigitalperiodontaldatatocompareperiodontaltreatmentoutcomesinapracticebasedresearchnetworkpbrnaproofofconcept
AT ratkakrugerpetra useofdigitalperiodontaldatatocompareperiodontaltreatmentoutcomesinapracticebasedresearchnetworkpbrnaproofofconcept
AT woelberjohanpeter useofdigitalperiodontaldatatocompareperiodontaltreatmentoutcomesinapracticebasedresearchnetworkpbrnaproofofconcept