Cargando…

A 10-Year Study on Larynx Preservation Compared With Surgical Resection in Patients With Locally Advanced Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Cancers

BACKGROUND: Few reports from China provide confirmed evidence of the effectiveness of the larynx preservation strategy compared with surgery on the treatment of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers. This study assessed the clinical outcomes of patients with locally advanced laryngeal and hypopharyng...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Su, Xuan, He, Hui-Chan, Ye, Zu-Lu, Zhou, Da-Lei, Liu, Qing, Yang, Xin-Hua, Long, Ya-Kang, Tang, Tao, Ma, Jiang-Jun, Xu, Bo-Heng, Chen, Wei-Chao, He, Cai-Yun, Yang, An-Kui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7594526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33178574
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.535893
_version_ 1783601661650927616
author Su, Xuan
He, Hui-Chan
Ye, Zu-Lu
Zhou, Da-Lei
Liu, Qing
Yang, Xin-Hua
Long, Ya-Kang
Tang, Tao
Ma, Jiang-Jun
Xu, Bo-Heng
Chen, Wei-Chao
He, Cai-Yun
Yang, An-Kui
author_facet Su, Xuan
He, Hui-Chan
Ye, Zu-Lu
Zhou, Da-Lei
Liu, Qing
Yang, Xin-Hua
Long, Ya-Kang
Tang, Tao
Ma, Jiang-Jun
Xu, Bo-Heng
Chen, Wei-Chao
He, Cai-Yun
Yang, An-Kui
author_sort Su, Xuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Few reports from China provide confirmed evidence of the effectiveness of the larynx preservation strategy compared with surgery on the treatment of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers. This study assessed the clinical outcomes of patients with locally advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers treated with larynx preservation and determined the optimal larynx preservation procedure. METHODS: Data of 1,494 patients treated with total laryngectomy or larynx preservation between 2006 and 2014 were retrieved from the database of Sun-Yat Sen University Cancer Center in Guangzhou, China, and 366 eligible patients were selected for final analysis. The clinical outcomes of 228 patients received total laryngectomy and 138 patients received larynx preservation treatments, which comprises induction followed by radiotherapy and concurrent radio-chemotherapy, were compared. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the 3-, 5-, and 10-year PFS and OS in patients received larynx preservation compared with patients treated with laryngectomy. With respect to T stage, a better overall OS in T2-stage disease (P = 0.036) but poorer PFS (P = 0.005) in T3-stage disease was observed in the larynx preservation group compared with the surgery group in Univariate analysis. T3-stage disease had poorer PFS in multivariable analysis (P = 0.022). With larynx preservation intent, induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy showed no advantage in the control of disease progression and survival compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The patient subpopulations who received efficacy assessment after induction chemotherapy exhibited significantly longer PFS and OS compared with those without efficacy assessment. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest sample size study on larynx preservation treatment for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers in China. Our results indicated that larynx preservation treatments did not jeopardize the survival of patients with advanced resectable laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancers. Efficacy assessment should be emphasized in induction chemotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7594526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75945262020-11-10 A 10-Year Study on Larynx Preservation Compared With Surgical Resection in Patients With Locally Advanced Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Cancers Su, Xuan He, Hui-Chan Ye, Zu-Lu Zhou, Da-Lei Liu, Qing Yang, Xin-Hua Long, Ya-Kang Tang, Tao Ma, Jiang-Jun Xu, Bo-Heng Chen, Wei-Chao He, Cai-Yun Yang, An-Kui Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Few reports from China provide confirmed evidence of the effectiveness of the larynx preservation strategy compared with surgery on the treatment of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers. This study assessed the clinical outcomes of patients with locally advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers treated with larynx preservation and determined the optimal larynx preservation procedure. METHODS: Data of 1,494 patients treated with total laryngectomy or larynx preservation between 2006 and 2014 were retrieved from the database of Sun-Yat Sen University Cancer Center in Guangzhou, China, and 366 eligible patients were selected for final analysis. The clinical outcomes of 228 patients received total laryngectomy and 138 patients received larynx preservation treatments, which comprises induction followed by radiotherapy and concurrent radio-chemotherapy, were compared. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the 3-, 5-, and 10-year PFS and OS in patients received larynx preservation compared with patients treated with laryngectomy. With respect to T stage, a better overall OS in T2-stage disease (P = 0.036) but poorer PFS (P = 0.005) in T3-stage disease was observed in the larynx preservation group compared with the surgery group in Univariate analysis. T3-stage disease had poorer PFS in multivariable analysis (P = 0.022). With larynx preservation intent, induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy showed no advantage in the control of disease progression and survival compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The patient subpopulations who received efficacy assessment after induction chemotherapy exhibited significantly longer PFS and OS compared with those without efficacy assessment. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest sample size study on larynx preservation treatment for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers in China. Our results indicated that larynx preservation treatments did not jeopardize the survival of patients with advanced resectable laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancers. Efficacy assessment should be emphasized in induction chemotherapy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7594526/ /pubmed/33178574 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.535893 Text en Copyright © 2020 Su, He, Ye, Zhou, Liu, Yang, Long, Tang, Ma, Xu, Chen, He and Yang http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Su, Xuan
He, Hui-Chan
Ye, Zu-Lu
Zhou, Da-Lei
Liu, Qing
Yang, Xin-Hua
Long, Ya-Kang
Tang, Tao
Ma, Jiang-Jun
Xu, Bo-Heng
Chen, Wei-Chao
He, Cai-Yun
Yang, An-Kui
A 10-Year Study on Larynx Preservation Compared With Surgical Resection in Patients With Locally Advanced Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Cancers
title A 10-Year Study on Larynx Preservation Compared With Surgical Resection in Patients With Locally Advanced Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Cancers
title_full A 10-Year Study on Larynx Preservation Compared With Surgical Resection in Patients With Locally Advanced Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Cancers
title_fullStr A 10-Year Study on Larynx Preservation Compared With Surgical Resection in Patients With Locally Advanced Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Cancers
title_full_unstemmed A 10-Year Study on Larynx Preservation Compared With Surgical Resection in Patients With Locally Advanced Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Cancers
title_short A 10-Year Study on Larynx Preservation Compared With Surgical Resection in Patients With Locally Advanced Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Cancers
title_sort 10-year study on larynx preservation compared with surgical resection in patients with locally advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7594526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33178574
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.535893
work_keys_str_mv AT suxuan a10yearstudyonlarynxpreservationcomparedwithsurgicalresectioninpatientswithlocallyadvancedlaryngealandhypopharyngealcancers
AT hehuichan a10yearstudyonlarynxpreservationcomparedwithsurgicalresectioninpatientswithlocallyadvancedlaryngealandhypopharyngealcancers
AT yezulu a10yearstudyonlarynxpreservationcomparedwithsurgicalresectioninpatientswithlocallyadvancedlaryngealandhypopharyngealcancers
AT zhoudalei a10yearstudyonlarynxpreservationcomparedwithsurgicalresectioninpatientswithlocallyadvancedlaryngealandhypopharyngealcancers
AT liuqing a10yearstudyonlarynxpreservationcomparedwithsurgicalresectioninpatientswithlocallyadvancedlaryngealandhypopharyngealcancers
AT yangxinhua a10yearstudyonlarynxpreservationcomparedwithsurgicalresectioninpatientswithlocallyadvancedlaryngealandhypopharyngealcancers
AT longyakang a10yearstudyonlarynxpreservationcomparedwithsurgicalresectioninpatientswithlocallyadvancedlaryngealandhypopharyngealcancers
AT tangtao a10yearstudyonlarynxpreservationcomparedwithsurgicalresectioninpatientswithlocallyadvancedlaryngealandhypopharyngealcancers
AT majiangjun a10yearstudyonlarynxpreservationcomparedwithsurgicalresectioninpatientswithlocallyadvancedlaryngealandhypopharyngealcancers
AT xuboheng a10yearstudyonlarynxpreservationcomparedwithsurgicalresectioninpatientswithlocallyadvancedlaryngealandhypopharyngealcancers
AT chenweichao a10yearstudyonlarynxpreservationcomparedwithsurgicalresectioninpatientswithlocallyadvancedlaryngealandhypopharyngealcancers
AT hecaiyun a10yearstudyonlarynxpreservationcomparedwithsurgicalresectioninpatientswithlocallyadvancedlaryngealandhypopharyngealcancers
AT yangankui a10yearstudyonlarynxpreservationcomparedwithsurgicalresectioninpatientswithlocallyadvancedlaryngealandhypopharyngealcancers
AT suxuan 10yearstudyonlarynxpreservationcomparedwithsurgicalresectioninpatientswithlocallyadvancedlaryngealandhypopharyngealcancers
AT hehuichan 10yearstudyonlarynxpreservationcomparedwithsurgicalresectioninpatientswithlocallyadvancedlaryngealandhypopharyngealcancers
AT yezulu 10yearstudyonlarynxpreservationcomparedwithsurgicalresectioninpatientswithlocallyadvancedlaryngealandhypopharyngealcancers
AT zhoudalei 10yearstudyonlarynxpreservationcomparedwithsurgicalresectioninpatientswithlocallyadvancedlaryngealandhypopharyngealcancers
AT liuqing 10yearstudyonlarynxpreservationcomparedwithsurgicalresectioninpatientswithlocallyadvancedlaryngealandhypopharyngealcancers
AT yangxinhua 10yearstudyonlarynxpreservationcomparedwithsurgicalresectioninpatientswithlocallyadvancedlaryngealandhypopharyngealcancers
AT longyakang 10yearstudyonlarynxpreservationcomparedwithsurgicalresectioninpatientswithlocallyadvancedlaryngealandhypopharyngealcancers
AT tangtao 10yearstudyonlarynxpreservationcomparedwithsurgicalresectioninpatientswithlocallyadvancedlaryngealandhypopharyngealcancers
AT majiangjun 10yearstudyonlarynxpreservationcomparedwithsurgicalresectioninpatientswithlocallyadvancedlaryngealandhypopharyngealcancers
AT xuboheng 10yearstudyonlarynxpreservationcomparedwithsurgicalresectioninpatientswithlocallyadvancedlaryngealandhypopharyngealcancers
AT chenweichao 10yearstudyonlarynxpreservationcomparedwithsurgicalresectioninpatientswithlocallyadvancedlaryngealandhypopharyngealcancers
AT hecaiyun 10yearstudyonlarynxpreservationcomparedwithsurgicalresectioninpatientswithlocallyadvancedlaryngealandhypopharyngealcancers
AT yangankui 10yearstudyonlarynxpreservationcomparedwithsurgicalresectioninpatientswithlocallyadvancedlaryngealandhypopharyngealcancers