Cargando…
Visually and olfactorily enhanced attractive devices for thrips management
‘Lure‐and‐infect’ is an insect pest management strategy with high potential but so far there are few examples of its application. Using traps as surrogates for auto‐dissemination devices, we tested the attractiveness to naturally occurring thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) of three trap types differi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7594531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33149364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eea.12969 |
_version_ | 1783601663075942400 |
---|---|
author | van Tol, Robert W. H. M. Davidson, Melanie M. Butler, Ruth C. Teulon, David A. J. de Kogel, Willem Jan |
author_facet | van Tol, Robert W. H. M. Davidson, Melanie M. Butler, Ruth C. Teulon, David A. J. de Kogel, Willem Jan |
author_sort | van Tol, Robert W. H. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | ‘Lure‐and‐infect’ is an insect pest management strategy with high potential but so far there are few examples of its application. Using traps as surrogates for auto‐dissemination devices, we tested the attractiveness to naturally occurring thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) of three trap types differing in colour and structure, with and without the thrips lure methyl isonicotinate (MI), and sticky plate traps as a control. The aim was to find more effective traps that could be further developed into devices for auto‐dissemination and lure‐and‐infect of thrips. The number of thrips captured varied substantially with trap type and the presence of the MI lure. We found a high visual response to a sticky ‘white ruffle’ trap (i.e., a 30‐cm‐long cylindrical outline of folded fabric), compared to a commonly used blue sticky plate trap (Bug‐scan) as the control. This effect was seen both in a greenhouse with roses (Rosa spp.), where we encountered western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande), and in a grass field, where we encountered onion thrips, Thrips tabaci Lindeman, and New Zealand flower thrips, Thrips obscuratus (Crawford). In the absence of MI, the white ruffle trap caught 7–22× more thrips than the control Bug‐scan trap. A similarly designed blue ruffle trap and a modified Lynfield trap caught lower thrips numbers than the white ruffle and the control Bug‐scan traps. Presence of MI substantially increased the captures of T. tabaci in all three trap types in the field (2.5–18×). In the greenhouse, without MI the white ruffle trap caught 3.5–14× more thrips than the Bug‐scan, blue ruffle, or modified Lynfield traps. Presence of MI increased the captures of F. occidentalis males and females in the Lynfield and blue ruffle traps (1.4–2.8×), but not in the white ruffle trap in the greenhouse (ca. 1.1×). The importance of visual and olfactory factors for the design of effective auto‐dissemination and lure‐and‐infect strategies for thrips management is discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7594531 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75945312020-11-02 Visually and olfactorily enhanced attractive devices for thrips management van Tol, Robert W. H. M. Davidson, Melanie M. Butler, Ruth C. Teulon, David A. J. de Kogel, Willem Jan Entomol Exp Appl Population Monitoring ‘Lure‐and‐infect’ is an insect pest management strategy with high potential but so far there are few examples of its application. Using traps as surrogates for auto‐dissemination devices, we tested the attractiveness to naturally occurring thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) of three trap types differing in colour and structure, with and without the thrips lure methyl isonicotinate (MI), and sticky plate traps as a control. The aim was to find more effective traps that could be further developed into devices for auto‐dissemination and lure‐and‐infect of thrips. The number of thrips captured varied substantially with trap type and the presence of the MI lure. We found a high visual response to a sticky ‘white ruffle’ trap (i.e., a 30‐cm‐long cylindrical outline of folded fabric), compared to a commonly used blue sticky plate trap (Bug‐scan) as the control. This effect was seen both in a greenhouse with roses (Rosa spp.), where we encountered western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande), and in a grass field, where we encountered onion thrips, Thrips tabaci Lindeman, and New Zealand flower thrips, Thrips obscuratus (Crawford). In the absence of MI, the white ruffle trap caught 7–22× more thrips than the control Bug‐scan trap. A similarly designed blue ruffle trap and a modified Lynfield trap caught lower thrips numbers than the white ruffle and the control Bug‐scan traps. Presence of MI substantially increased the captures of T. tabaci in all three trap types in the field (2.5–18×). In the greenhouse, without MI the white ruffle trap caught 3.5–14× more thrips than the Bug‐scan, blue ruffle, or modified Lynfield traps. Presence of MI increased the captures of F. occidentalis males and females in the Lynfield and blue ruffle traps (1.4–2.8×), but not in the white ruffle trap in the greenhouse (ca. 1.1×). The importance of visual and olfactory factors for the design of effective auto‐dissemination and lure‐and‐infect strategies for thrips management is discussed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-27 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7594531/ /pubmed/33149364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eea.12969 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Netherlands Entomological Society This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Population Monitoring van Tol, Robert W. H. M. Davidson, Melanie M. Butler, Ruth C. Teulon, David A. J. de Kogel, Willem Jan Visually and olfactorily enhanced attractive devices for thrips management |
title | Visually and olfactorily enhanced attractive devices for thrips management |
title_full | Visually and olfactorily enhanced attractive devices for thrips management |
title_fullStr | Visually and olfactorily enhanced attractive devices for thrips management |
title_full_unstemmed | Visually and olfactorily enhanced attractive devices for thrips management |
title_short | Visually and olfactorily enhanced attractive devices for thrips management |
title_sort | visually and olfactorily enhanced attractive devices for thrips management |
topic | Population Monitoring |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7594531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33149364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eea.12969 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vantolrobertwhm visuallyandolfactorilyenhancedattractivedevicesforthripsmanagement AT davidsonmelaniem visuallyandolfactorilyenhancedattractivedevicesforthripsmanagement AT butlerruthc visuallyandolfactorilyenhancedattractivedevicesforthripsmanagement AT teulondavidaj visuallyandolfactorilyenhancedattractivedevicesforthripsmanagement AT dekogelwillemjan visuallyandolfactorilyenhancedattractivedevicesforthripsmanagement |